similar to: alternative for imq

Hi I''ve a stupid question. How can I shape upload using IMQ? Instead of putting a rule in iptables in PREROUTING should i use POSTROUTING? And another question is, can I make routing rule based on ip addresses assigned by iptables to an imq device? The idea is, let''s say i have some rules in iptables like: -t mangle -A PREROUTING -s 192.168.0.0/16 -j IMQ --todev 0 Can i route

Hello, Sorry for the many Ccs, but I hope to reach all parties involved. I want to do traffic shaping with NAT and I wanted to do it with IFB instead of IMQ [1]. I tried a lot of things but now I am stuck (and maybe confused). The setup: eth0 eth1 WAN/(Internet) <-> Linux Router <-> LAN Linux router: - does NAT for the LANs - runs local processes

Hi, i am running imq + htb on my router , the situation is like this eth0 = uplink to my provider eth1 = 1st customer eth2 = 2nd customer eth3 = 3th customer eth0 has limit 512 and i want to share this between eth1 eth2 and eth3 , but not working , this is the script i used, \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ #!/bin/sh

Hi all, my IMQ device works OK (thanks to Andy Furniss), but now I''ve problems to attach the traffic in the qdisc''s. This is my conf: ----------------------------------------------------------------------- INET | |eth0 300Kbps ROUTER (NAT) |eth1 | LAN ----------------------------------------------------------------------- MAX=300 tc qdisc add dev imq0 root handle 1: htb

Hello, I''m trying to get my shaper to work, but have only a partial success. Can someone help me with that. My setup unfortunately is not so trivial, but I think some people could have similar one... 1. There is a router connected to the internet line via interface eth0 2. There are users connected to the router via two interfaces : eth1 and wlan0 3. All users are assigned private IP

Hi! I have read all informations i could find, but some things are still not clear. My setup is: ---INTERNET1(eth0)-\ /- Local net1 (eth2) GW ---INTERNET2(eth1)-/ \- Local net2 (eth3) I have NAT and a working setup using HTB,SFQ, classifying with the iptables -j CLASSIFY way. I shape only the traffic coming from the internet heading to the intranet. I would like

Folks, I''m so surprised what happened to my box just in the few weeks lately. Here is my setup: INTERNET <----------> [eth0] SHAPER-BOX [eth1] <----------> USER-FARM both eth0 & eth1 got public ips (202.x.x.x) Why traffic monitored at eth0 is bigger than eth1 ? eth1 shaped just exactly the same as rate i defined in HTB. I just have 1024Kbps from my ISP and i defined the

Hi I try setup imq pseudo device for shaping I''m work such script #!/bin/sh TC=/sbin/tc /sbin/modprobe imq numdevs=1 /sbin/ip link set imq0 up $TC qdisc add dev imq0 handle 1: root htb default 1 $TC class add dev imq0 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 10mbit # client1 tunnel tunnel $TC class add dev imq0 parent 1: classid 1:2 htb rate 256kbit $TC filter add dev imq0 protocol ip parent 1:0

Hello people, This the first time i post in list. I read the lartc how-to and decided that IMQ with HTB was the solution to solve my problem. The ingress shaping i want is simple, shape the traffic to my ftp-server, i just want to give 8kbps to each client because they only upload to my ftp-server, and i dont want to any class borrowing, each client only send(upload) at 8kbps, not above this

>From netdev@oss.sgi.com: ----- Forwarded message from jamal <hadi@cyberus.ca> ----- X-Original-To: sebek@localhost X-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2004 03:25:37 +0200 (CEST) Subject: (Long) ANNOUNCE: IMQ replacement WAS(Re: [RFC/PATCH] IMQ port to 2.6 From: jamal <hadi@cyberus.ca> Reply-To: hadi@cyberus.ca To: "Vladimir B. Savkin" <master@sectorb.msk.ru> Cc:

I want to shape the incoming traffic ( download ) "but using only fwmark", i know there are other methods, but i want to use this one particularly... So, first i create DOWNLOAD and mark with 20 all the traffic with destination 10.0.0.3 ( eth1 ) incoming from my internet device ( eth0 ). #$IPTABLES -t mangle -N DOWNLOAD #$IPTABLES -t mangle -I PREROUTING -i eth0 -j DOWNLOAD

hi stef oone more pb while shaping incoming traffic with imq .this one tc qdisc add dev imq0 root handle 1: htb default 20 tc class add dev imq0 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 2mbit burst 15k tc class add dev imq0 parent 1:1 classid 1:10 htb rate 1mbit tc class add dev imq0 parent 1:1 classid 1:20 htb rate 1mbit tc qdisc add dev imq0 parent 1:10 handle 10: pfifo tc qdisc add dev imq0 parent

Hi All, Please to advice me. I become crazy because i cannot find where can be problem. Obviously i miss something, but what ? I have Linux router for traffic control / ~400 users , 100 mbit bandwidth / . evereting was great until i try to implement IMQ for ingress shaping. Problem that i have is when i start follow iptables rule iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -i eth1 -j IMQ --todev 0 without

Hi, with the attached config my gaming ping is still +20ms, even if the line isn''t saturated..can anybody give me a hint how to get a better response time? my line: 1024/128kbit outbound: one htb qdisc for gaming (7kbps) prio 0 ceil 14kbps<- should get more traffic when needed. Htb again for irc and default. inbound: css, irc, p2p, default <- same shema as before, give css

I want to shape the bandwith for only 2 PC''s but cannot make this work. This is what i do ( i want to use imq for all this ) ip link set imq0 up tc qdisc add dev imq0 root handle 1: htb default 2 tc class add dev imq0 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 100kbit burst 6k prio 0 tc class add dev imq0 parent 1: classid 1:2 htb rate 50kbit burst 6k prio 2 tc filter add dev imq0 parent 1:

For some time now im trying to get to know what causes such configuration of QOS (kernel 2.4.25-2.4.28 + IMQ patch and ofcourse wrr): -- WRR_MAX_CLASSES=200 DEV_IN=imq0 ifconfig $DEV_IN down ifconfig $DEV_IN up tc qdisc add dev ${DEV_IN} handle 1:0 root htb default 10 tc class add dev ${DEV_IN} parent 1:0 classid 1:10 htb rate 1000kbit burst 1kbit prio 1 tc qdisc add dev ${DEV_IN} parent 1:10

Hello everyone. CONFIGURATION DESCRIPTION: I have a linux box doing masquerade for two lan''s. Here is a piece of mine network config: eth0 : ISP , one public ip address (DSL modem) eth1 : lan , private network address fe: 192.168.4.0/24 eth2 : wlan access point performing as lan2wlan bridge , private network addes fe. 192.168.67.0/24 This box use 2.6.20 kernel with iptables-1.3.8

Hi all and tc Gururs i have patched the IMQ and htb to kernel, but when i do egress filtering, iam not able to see any traffic and excusted the following the commands modprobe imq numdevs=1 tc qdisc add dev imq0 handle 1: root htb default 1 tc class add dev imq0 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 100kbit tc qdisc add dev imq0 parent 1:1 handle 10: htb default 1 tc class add dev imq0 parent

I''ve done some tests with TC FILTER and his PRIO and think that is an error or OMISION on TC FILTER DOCUMENTATION from: http://lartc.org/howto/lartc.qdisc.filters.html#AEN1100 Let''s say we have a PRIO qdisc called ''10:'' which contains three classes, and we want to assign all traffic from and to port 22 to the highest priority band, the filters would be: