similar to: Totally naive - what is meant by REST?

> "LLVM" is officially no longer an acronym. The acronym it once expanded too was confusing, and inappropriate almost from day 1. :) As LLVM has grown to encompass other subprojects, it became even less useful and meaningless. > > In short, it is just "The LLVM Project", and LLVM doesn't stand for anything anymore. It is a nice short domain name though :)

On Dec 21, 2011, at 7:05 PM, 陳韋任 wrote: >> "LLVM" is officially no longer an acronym. The acronym it once expanded too was confusing, and inappropriate almost from day 1. :) As LLVM has grown to encompass other subprojects, it became even less useful and meaningless. >> >> In short, it is just "The LLVM Project", and LLVM doesn't stand for anything

The LLVM term in Wikipedia still uses the old explanation. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Low_Level_Virtual_Machine On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 11:15 PM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: > > On Dec 21, 2011, at 7:05 PM, 陳韋任 wrote: > >>> "LLVM" is officially no longer an acronym.  The acronym it once expanded too was confusing, and inappropriate almost

Dear R-community, maybe someone can help me with this: I've been using the loess() smoother for quite a while now, and for the matter of documentation I'd like to resolve the acronym LOESS. Unfortunately there's no explanation in the help file, and I didn't get anything convincing from google either. I know that the predecessor LOWESS stands for "Locally Weighted

On Dec 21, 2011, at 8:35 AM, Jianzhou Zhao wrote: > Hi LLVM, > > I have a question that is irrelevant to LLVM developing, but do not > know where to post. I found the LLVM webpage uses the following new > introduction of LLVM > "The LLVM Project is a collection of modular and reusable compiler > and toolchain technologies. Despite its name, LLVM has little to do >

Can you better this String acronym method? def acronym name letters=[] name.each_char {|char| letters<<char if char[0]>=65 and char[0]<=90} acronym = letters.join " " end chris -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

> On Feb 12, 2019, at 4:02 AM, Björn Pettersson A via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > (Sorry if this subject already has been discussed, but I could not find any clear rules/recommendations.) > > What would the recommendation be for acronyms (I’ve seen the rule about avoiding them unless they are “well known”, > but sometimes an acronym is useful, and we

I would assume that the proper name in this case is constantExpr, and not CE. This is not really an acronym, but rather a shortcut taken for some unclear reason. > On 12. Feb 2019, at 13:02, Björn Pettersson A via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > (Sorry if this subject already has been discussed, but I could not find any clear rules/recommendations.) > >

Hello, is there an acronym method in php markdown extra ? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://six.pairlist.net/pipermail/markdown-discuss/attachments/20070306/e146240b/attachment.html

I've seen this Acronym thrown around alot in reference to games. What is it exactly? Is it good? How do I use it? Thanks, Aaron Cline

It very much depends on what is following the code snippit. If the second "if" is guarding a substantial block of code, "constantExpr" might very well be a good name. Otherwise something like "cExpr" or "constExpr" might be fine. In the past when I have seen things like "CE" in the code, it's not always immediately clear to me what it is. I

Hi all, As application of the naming rules are currently under discussion [1] this seems like a good time to bring this up: The current variable naming rule [2] states: Variable names should be nouns (as they represent state). The name should be camel case, and start with an upper case letter (e.g. Leader or Boats). I'm a relatively new arrival to the LLVM codebase and I want to follow the

> I enjoyed the new coding style in recent patches. Camel case makes it easy > to pick a descriptive name. Starting functions and variables with lower > cases reduces chances to conflict with a type name. Honestly speaking, I don't. Especially in the cases when varname is made from an acronym. E.g. MachineInstr *MI looks much better than MachineInstr *mi, etc. See latest Rafael's

Hi LLVM, I have a question that is irrelevant to LLVM developing, but do not know where to post. I found the LLVM webpage uses the following new introduction of LLVM "The LLVM Project is a collection of modular and reusable compiler and toolchain technologies. Despite its name, LLVM has little to do with traditional virtual machines, ..." I remember the old webpage said that LLVM =

I can''t believe I''m back again with another rest question. I did go through the peepcode podcast. I thought though you can have multiple nested resources, is that not true ? I have this set up map.resources :candidates do |candidate| candidate.resources :canbackgrounds candidate.resources :canpositions end I just coded up teh canpositions and now all

On Saturday 08. September 2007 16:12:08 Ivo Emanuel Gon?alves wrote: > Thanks a lot for taking an interest and trying to work with metadata > in Ogg. There have been efforts before, but they have seemly gone > nowhere. I've heard there's a need for a serious metadata framework > in Ogg, albeit me personally would find no use for it. Then again, > the Web's moving to a

On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 05:52:02PM +0100, Michael Kruse via llvm-dev wrote: > * The library is named LLVMISL and contained in the lib/ISL folder to > work best with LLVM's component system. The component's name "ISL" was > chosen over "isl" as it matches the capitalization of other > two/three-letter-acronym components. Are the ISL sources themselve put

--=-97YF284NV6yShaPqFwb/ Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I have to say Shorewall is the closest in my mind to a perfect iptables firewall generation script. Thanks Tom for a great product. 2 things that could make it even better in my mind: - instead of using service acronym (don''t know how to call it differently) for rules, it would be great to be able to

On Fri, 22 Apr 2016, Digimer wrote: > Then you would use pacemaker to manage the floating IP, fence > (stonith) a lost node, and promote drbd->mount FS->start nfsd->start > floating IP. My favorite acronym: stonith -- shoot the other node in the head. -- Paul Heinlein heinlein at madboa.com 45?38' N, 122?6' W

> Tilghman Lesher wrote: >> On Sunday 18 January 2004 12:01, Adthrawn wrote: >> >>> Spell out RAID - Redundant Array of Inexpensive Disks. Bingo. >> >> >> That's "Independent Disks". It's the independence of each spindle >> that >> is valued, not the cost proposition. If one spindle goes, it's not >> all >>