similar to: htb , tcp over udp problem

Hi ; +--------+ +-----------+ +--------+ | server |---------- | linux box |---------------------| Client | +--------+ +-----------+ +--------+ MY script: tc-htb3 qdisc del dev eth1 root ipchains -F tc-htb3 qdisc add dev eth1 root handle 10: htb default 20 r2q 40 tc-htb3 class add dev eth1 parent 10: classid 10:1 htb

Hello Thilo, What did you find superior with CBQ-wondershaper over HTB-wondershaper? We have not been using wondershaper specifically but our simple tests so far seem to show that htb is much easier to configure for a given target shape (i.,e accurate) compared to CBQ. Torsten -----Original Message----- From: Thilo Schulz [mailto:arny@ats.s.bawue.de] Sent: Saturday, June 14, 2003 8:55 AM To:

Hello List, I use HTB in a ~80 users serving router with kernel 2.4.20. eth0 is the internet interface (half-duplex 1Mbit), eth1 the internal interface (100Mbit full duplex) cause of the fact that the router also serves as a http-proxy (squid) i thought setting up the default class on eth1 with the real upload-speed (100Mbit) would do the job, i.e. shaping normal stuff to 1Mbit except local

Hi! I have just started with traffic shaping, and after hours of reading websites, man pages asf. I am still stumped at one problem I have. The interface eth0 is attached to the outside world, and I have an openvpn tunnel to another part of the organization using eth0 and port 5001. The idea was that all traffic going through the tunnel would have top priority and the rest share

HTB and imq was used to control traffic. AC="tc class add dev eth0 parent" $AC 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 100kbps burst 2k $AC 1:2 classid 1:10 htb rate 50kbps ceil 100kbps burst 2k prio 1 $AC 1:2 classid 1:11 htb rate 50kbps ceil 100kbps burst 2k prio 2 $AC 1:2 classid 1:12 htb rate 50kbps ceil 100kbps burst 2k please tell me if i do not set prio, what is the default prio? low delay class

Thank you for your help. It generates this script : tc qdisc add dev eth0 handle 1:0 root htb default 2 tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:0 classid 1:1 htb rate 75000bps ceil \ 75000bps tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:0 classid 1:2 htb rate 125000bps tc filter add dev eth0 parent 1:0 protocol all prio 1 u32 match u32 \ 0xa000001 0xffffffff at 12 classid 1:1 But I thought it was necessary to

Salut lartc (lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl), 18:12:52 kernel HTB init, kernel part version 3.10 18:12:52 kernel HTB: quantum of class 100001 is small. Consider r2q change. 18:12:52 kernel HTB: quantum of class 100002 is small. Consider r2q change. 18:12:52 kernel HTB: quantum of class 100003 is small. Consider r2q change. 18:12:52 kernel HTB: quantum of class 100004 is small. Consider r2q change.

HTB performance improvement Hi all ! i''m looking at the performance of the HTB algorithm/implementation because i would like more packets/sec !! this is the scenario of the performance test: i''m using an embedded system with: SPEED CPU: 399,999 MHz RAM: 128 MByte FLASH: 16 MByte EEPROM: 8Kbyte PROCESSOR MPC8272 a lan to lan 10/100 and in particular we are sending

Hey, I have such a script: tc qdisc add dev $DEV root handle 1:0 htb default 21 r2q 2 tc class add dev $DEV parent 1:0 classid 1:11 htb rate 100mbit tc class add dev $DEV parent 1:11 classid 1:21 htb rate 512kbit ceil 512kbit tc class add dev $DEV parent 1:11 classid 1:23 htb rate 1024kbit ceil 1024kbit tc class add dev $DEV parent 1:11 classid 1:25 htb rate 3072kbit

Hi all, Is the prio specification in the htb class global or is it on a per class basis ? A simple example: class 1:10 parent 1: class 1:100 parent 1:10 prio 3 class 1:200 parent 1:10 prio 7 class 1:201 parent 1:200 prio 1 class 1:202 parent 1:200 prio 2 Which class will get excessive bandwidth first? 100 or 201/202 ? _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list

Hello. I have been trying to duplicate these u32 matching rules using TCNG, but without much success: tc filter add dev eth0 protocol ip parent 1:0 prio 1 u32\ match ip protocol 6 0xff \ match u8 0x05 0x0f at 0 \ match u16 0x0000 0xffc0 at 2 \ match u8 0x10 0xff at 33 \ flowid 1:10 Wondershaper 1.1a implements this and if I run it things seem to be shaped as expected. But this TCNG

Yes sure here they are: The first one that i have received 2day and does not work almost at all: #!/bin/bash ETH_IN="eth1" ETH_OUT="eth0" BANDA_TOTALA="2Mbit" # pentru neclasificati ar trebui sa fie banda minima - 1k - aici ar trebui sa ajunga trafic necunoscut, # care nu e organizat in shape-uri BANDA_NECLASIFICATI="8kbit" #Shape generale /sbin/tc

Hello LARTC!!!! There is a question that kills me everytime I think about it. I just love HTB and for one year since I started to work wih it I had no complains until one day. One client needs to allocate the shared bandwith , based on priorities. The HTB as everybody knows have the CEIL parameter and also PRIO which are supposed to solve the problem. Now the problem: I configure everything, rate

Hi, I am looking working (!) qdisc that would guarantee preferential treatment to priority (ex voice traffic). It is supposed to work as LLQ (Cisco) which means it is PQ but with bandwidth limited for EF PHB traffic. I did lots of tests with CBQ and prio set to 1 for EF PHB and prio 2 for best effort. Although delay does not look like being guaranteed at all for priority traffic. Eventually I

Hi,All I use HTB to control traffic.Here is my script: /usr/sbin/tc qdisc del dev nas0 root /usr/sbin/tc qdisc add dev nas0 root handle 1:0 htb default 60 /usr/sbin/tc class add dev nas0 parent 1:0 classid 1:1 htb ceil 896kbit rate 896kbit prio 0 burst 60k /usr/sbin/tc class add dev nas0 parent 1:1 classid 1:10 htb ceil 896kbit rate 537kbit prio 1 burst 60k /usr/sbin/tc class add dev

Hi, I''ve try to use htb to limit outgoing traffic but it seems that it doesn''t work. I guess the probem is the filter. Here is my script. #!/bin/sh echo "Add root qdisc, default traffic go to 1:30" tc qdisc add dev eth1 root handle 1: htb default 30 tc class add dev eth1 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 100mbit burst 15k tc class add dev eth1 parent 1:1 classid 1:10

It seems Andreas Klauer''s fairnat has experimental support for using HTB''s MPU and overhead options. fairnat.config: # Use MPU for HTB. From the LARTC Howto on MPU: # "A zero-sized packet does not use zero bandwidth. For ethernet, no packet # uses less than 64 bytes. The Minimum Packet Unit determines the minimal # token usage for a packet." HTB_MPU=0 # HTB_MPU=64

Hi! I recently changed my qdisc from CBQ and PRIO to only HTB, and I can''t really seem to get the rates to work as I want them to. I have eight classes, which I set up as follows: tc qdisc add dev eth1 root handle 1: htb default 122 tc class add dev eth1 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 1000kbit ceil 1000kbit cburst 1500 burst 50kb tc class add dev eth1 parent 1:1 classid 1:11 htb prio 0

Hello. The problems are: 1. Using HTB I get negative values for tokens and ctokens in tc -s output, for example: mich:~# tc -s -d class show dev eth0 class htb 1:11 parent 1:1 prio 1 quantum 1024 rate 8Kbit ceil 23Kbit burst 1609b/8 mpu 0b cburst 1628b/8 mpu 0b level 0 Sent 0 bytes 0 pkts (dropped 0, overlimits 0) lended: 0 borrowed: 0 giants: 0 tokens: 1287999 ctokens: 453286 class htb 1:1

Hello, I have a linux bridge setup and am using HTB to bandwidth manage traffic passing through the bridge. I want to manage "some" of the traffic passing through the bridge. I figured I can do this if I dont define a "default" class on the qdisc. I will only config classes for traffic I want to manage. Assume that i Have traffic for network 10.0.0.0/24 passing through the