similar to: Number of routing tables..255 limit?

Jens wrote: >I am trying to trace a problem I have in redirecting my mail traffic to a >different ISP. I have set up a whole bunch of logging rules but am still a >bit mystified and could use some clarification.... > >The setup (shortened somewhat for this example): >Cable connection coming into a firewall/router going to a mail server in the >DMZ. >The interface on the

Hi I''m wondering if I could get some help setting up the routing tables in my ionteranl system. I''ve read what I have found about this, but I''m not getting any wiser... This is my network at home: Internet <-- DSL modem <--- Internet router (192.168.0.1) <--- eth1 (192.168.0.99) Linux server eth0 (192.168.1.122) ---> Workstation (192.168.1.22) ---> Thin

Dear all, First please excuse me for my very bad english. I''m curently setting up a gateway (linux 2.6.7) with load balancing ( multipath ). I access them from lan and my external interfaces are NATed. I''m used iproute2 as described in the LARTC and nano howto. My problem is that connections are well balanced but often, long connection are break because the default route

Hi all I am a newbie to routing and I have a problem. I am trying to setup a Load Balanced router with the help of Advanced Routing and iproute2. I came across netsane script(http://muse.linuxmafia.org/netsane/) and Christopher Simon''s nano how to which told me some basic steps to do so. As i follwed these I ran into a few questions and problems. 1. Is it possible that I have no default

Hello all, I am having some difficults to make a routing rule work. I want that every P2P packages go to one interface (eth2 - cheaper link) nad the rest of the traffic go to another interface (eth0 - frame relay very expensive). I am using this script to make the mark and balance: ------- #!/bin/bash IPT="/usr/local/sbin/iptables" IP="/sbin/ip" #---- # Declara redes #----

Hello again, I have a router/nat linux box. I managed to create some HTB classes and everything is OK. When perople are usig download managers like FlashGet and DAP (multiple connection ones), the ceil limiting works okay, but the rate parameter is somehow useles... The guaranteed bandwidth is never reached. So what can I do to limit the number of connections/computer? I want to make sure that

Hello! I''ve read a lot of mail archives, but can''t find solutions for my problem. I have router with about 700 users. I''m using HTB with SFQ leaf qdiscs for every user (client ip). So, different IP can have its own rate limit. This scheme ir working fine for a long time. But how can I limit number of connections (sessions) from one host? I see from ip_conntrack

In linux one can have several route tables. But how do I list the route tables? (and no ''ip rule list'' is not it) -- damjan | дамјан This is my jabber ID --> damjan@bagra.net.mk <-- not my mail address!!! _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

Hi! I got some strange problem with routing loadbalancing. I cannot get the full speed from my ISPs until I get some big files from close ftp server. I have server with one connection to internal network and 3 to ISPs: __________ | eth1|---- ISP1 | | internal--|eth0 eth2|---- ISP2 net | | (~300 | eth3|---- ISP3 hosts

Hello, I have tested a simple thing in two version of Linux and there was a problem when I have used fwmark as a selector for rule lookups. As you can see below on the Slack, the <test> table doesn''t have any label about fwmark. Is there an iproute problem? -------------------------------------- # cat /etc/fedora-release Fedora Core release 2 (Tettnang) # uname -r 2.6.5-1.358 #

What about some sort of DNAT redirection with iptables? - Greg -----Original Message----- From: Tobias [mailto:medlor@web.de] Sent: Friday, April 19, 2002 8:18 AM To: lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl Subject: Re: [LARTC] Routing based on source port - Solution ? Hello bert I have the same problem and tried all possibities i know. "ip rule" in fact doesnt route based on port because IP

hi all, we were trying to configure our system with 2 ethernet catds connected to two different providers using iproute2 so that it recieves and transmits data from both of them. We have followed the configuration as given on lartc''s howto But the most wierd part of the story is that after we restart the system (We have put the script in rc.local) the system works fine and we can ping

Hi asa, You can make a script to ping your internet gateway every 5 minutes and if it´s down it automatically switch the default route do gateway 2. You set a script to run x time with cron job. []´s Anderson > hi all, > > i''m using squid as a proxy server, and have 2 gateway f or internet access, > currently i''m using 1 gateway for the internet access, if

* sorry for the 2 previous schemas, they came out a mess. I hope this one is understandable. hi: I have this 2 boxes set up like this: 2020::2/128 2020::254/128 3030::254/128 192.168.0.2/24 192.168.0.254/24 192.168.30.254/24 +-------+ eth0 eth3 +-------+ | |==================== | | eth1 | A | | B | ---- | |

Hi all I am conducting the experiments comparing IP router forwarding delay and MPLS LSR forwarding delay, it is obvious in theory MPLS in Core should be faster than IP, but for small netork (only have several core routers), result show it is not, this is why I want emulate a large IP routing table in one core router. can I do it and how ? right now I use static routing table (by using command :

Hi, Thanks for the reply. Thats where the problem starts. If I set ppp0 as the default gw the internet doesnt work anymore. This is how im doing it... route del default route add default gw 217.32.81.74 dev ppp0 if I put it back to ppp1... route del default route add default gw 217.32.68.73 dev ppp1 It works fine again. Whats up with that? Cheers, Chris ----- Original Message

Hi, I''m trying to do some horrible private address routing between networks. Is there a way to handle the following? I''m guessing policy routing *might* be the way, but anyway... Two networks, accessible via public addresses -- a /29 on each. Each network, however, has more machines than this, so one also has 192.168.0.0/24 and the other has 192.168.1.0/24. I have an IPIP

Hi, I have Mandrake 10.0 gateway with internet via. ppp0. Also, another machine 192.168.0.4 is always connected to net via. a dial-up modem. Now I want to allow a machine (192.168.0.2) in my LAN to access net through 192.168.0.4. So according to lartc howto I did, # echo 200 John >> /etc/iproute2/rt_tables # ip rule add from 192.168.0.2 table John # ip route add default via 192.168.0.4 dev

Thanks Jose, I found the key in the routing table of Router2; it had bad entries for the farest subnets (didn't have the 'via' commands...). Thanks for helping me. Now I'm gonna configure the network with IPv6 'cause I have to make it work with Mobile IPv6. Anybody working on these funny things can mail me, so we can suffer togheter! :-) Bye, Mauro -----Messaggio

Hello all, I do not read C very well (especially kernel C). Though I have tried to muddle my way through an understanding of what''s going on in fib_hash.c, fib_rules.c, and route.c, I have not succeeded to my satisfaction, hence my post. I''m trying to document the general process of route selection, and have come up with the following overview. Could somebody point out any