similar to: up and down shaping based on IP

Hello, i have a server (486sx and 16ram). My pc is providing internet to 12 other computers. Ethernet cards are realteks 8139 (drivers builtin to the kernel 2.6.8). It gives me this error : NETDEVICE WATCHDOG eth1 : ...timeout. I checked in many places for solutions. Even wrote to this mailinglist. But lately i recived information, that too much upload may mix my adsl modem up. So..... my

I have htb on 486 sx with 16mb ram. Slackware 9.1. Connection : dsl 1Mbit. 486 works as router and trafic shaper for network made of 12 pc''s. it does the job quite well, but when i play Counter-Strike or connect to my 486 via ssh (on lan), i get huge lag every 11-20 sec. when i connect to 486 via ssh and run iptraf program i see all the trafic, and after a while when lag comes the

Hi! I recently changed my qdisc from CBQ and PRIO to only HTB, and I can''t really seem to get the rates to work as I want them to. I have eight classes, which I set up as follows: tc qdisc add dev eth1 root handle 1: htb default 122 tc class add dev eth1 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 1000kbit ceil 1000kbit cburst 1500 burst 50kb tc class add dev eth1 parent 1:1 classid 1:11 htb prio 0

Dear Thomas, thank you for prompt response and taking interest in this issue. I really appreciate your compiler project and efficiency gains in usual case. I am aware of limitations of interpreted languages too and because of that even when writing my first mail I had a hunch that it is not that easy to address this problem. As you mentioned optimisation of compiler for handling non-standard

Dear R team, I am a co-author and maintainer of one of R packages distributed by R-forge (gEcon). One of gEcon package users found a strange behaviour of package (R froze for couple of minutes) and reported it to me. I traced the strange behaviour to compiler package. I attach short demonstration of the problem to this mail (demonstration makes use of compiler and tictoc packages only). In

Dear Karol, I don't understand the models behind these function, but I can tell that the code generated is very inefficient. The AST interpreter will be very inefficient performing each scalar computation with all boxing, allocations, function calls. The byte-code compiler removes some of the boxing and allocation. While it could certainly compile faster, it will always be taking long

Dear Karol, thank you for the report. I can reproduce that the function from you example takes very long to compile and I can see where most time is spent. The compiler is itself written in R and requires a lot of resources for large functions (foo() has over 16,000 lines of code, nearly 1 million of instructions/operands, 45,000 constants). In particular a lot of time is spent in garbage

Hi Stef, Sorry to write to you directly but my list membership is not working, I receive the archive but cant send to the list, cant delete myself because I don''t exist and can''t rejoin as they say I do exist, anyway hope you don''t mind Can you tell me what the difference between these two scripts is please. What I want to achieve is a high speed channel 1000kbit from

Hello. I''m running linux box with Slackware 9.1 and compiled kernel 2.4.31 with "yes" to VLANs and "yes" to all QoS. On this box i have more ethernet interfaces: eth0 eth1 eth2 and so as more vlan interfaces: eth0.100 eth1.3 eth1.4 This is entrace(uplink) router to our whole network and my goal is to shape users on this machine. I want for this purpose use HTB so

Hi all, I''m experimenting with HTB and the prio parameter and it does not give me results I expect. I''ve created 4 HTB classes: 1:10 TCP ACKs (prio 0) 1:20 TCP traffic on dst port 10001 (prio 1) 1:30 TCP traffic on dst port 10000 (prio 2) 1:40 Default (prio 3) ceil and rate parameters are the same for all 4 classes (rate is

http://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=712 Summary: iptables-save does not save correcly rateest bps parameter Product: iptables Version: unspecified Platform: x86_64 OS/Version: Debian GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: unknown AssignedTo:

Hello everyone, First of all, sorry for my poor english. I''ve been working with this for a few weeks and I''m getting sick... I''m trying to control the bandwith in my network using the following script. The machine where the script is running makes NAT, eth0 is connected to the router and eth1 is connected to the Lan. When I run the script it doesn''t appear any

Hi there, I am quite new to lartc and the usage of tc commands is still very difficult for me. All examples I have read (including the lartc.pdf) are way too complex for my "simple" problem. I just need to hard limit a given interface to a bandwith (egress and ingress) like: eth0 inbound 1000kbit eth0 outbound 1000kbit No priorities, just a bandwidth limitation per device.

Hi, i''m running a Bridge/iptables firewall, with no tc filters configured CPU utilization barely reaches 1%, i had to rate limit one particular server outgoing traffic and setup a HTB scheme like this iptables -F PREROUTING -t mangle iptables -A PREROUTING -t mangle -p tcp -s 99.99.99.99 -j MARK --set-mark 2 tc qdisc del dev eth0 root tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 10: htb default

Hi, While researching on where rsync-3.0.6 spending more time when we have huge number of files in directory(~1000K files). I got below statistics: 2009/05/28 19:05:38 [9660] building file list . . . 2009/05/28 21:40:09 [9660] Number of files: 724591 2009/05/28 21:40:09 [9660] Number of files transferred: 5674 2009/05/28 21:40:09 [9660] Total file size: 63492447862 bytes 2009/05/28

Hello What I''m looking for is how to configure the Linux QoS module to do global rate limitation for two (or more) 802.1q pseudo network devices. I naturally suppose there is a possibility with IFB. I don''t want to use IMQ because it''s not integrated to my kernel v2.6.21.1 and I didn''t find IMQ patches for it nor for the iptables package I use (v1.3.7).

Is there a way to efficiently read large datasets directly into a matrix byrow? I know data.frame, but for large datasets it doesn't efficiently work, also if I increase the cons memory. R --nsize 1000k --vsize 90M ... > x<-read.table("pendler.luft.txt") Error: cons memory (1000000 cells) exhausted See "help(Memory)" on how to increase the number of cons

On 16 Jun 2015, at 03:50, David Gessel <gessel at blackrosetech.com> wrote: > >> Alessio Cecchi skrev den 2015-06-01 15:29: >>> Il 20/05/2015 10:44, David Gessel ha scritto: >>>> Is there a way to completely disable caching on dovecot? >>> >>> Yes: mail_location = maildir:~/Maildir:INDEX=MEMORY >> >> dont know if that really

Hi, everyone I has a ADSL link about 4M bandwidth, and use HTB do bandwidth management. When I config qdisc like below: tc qdisc add dev br0 root handle 1: htb default 30 tc class add dev br0 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 4000kbit tc class add dev br0 parent 1:1 classid 1:10 htb rate 2000kbit ceil 4000kbit prio 0 tc class add dev br0 parent 1:1 classid 1:20 htb rate 1000kbit ceil 4000kbit

Hi! I tried to make IMQ work for the past week, but i keep getting a lot of trouble with it. First the latency is growing from 0.1ms to 1.5ms and second the CPU usage is very high and is not very stable, sometimes, after a day, there''s a lot of packet loss. I''m using the latest stable kernel 2.6.9 with latest imq patch. Is there any other alternative to IMQ for limiting inbound