similar to: is round-robin on interface aliases possible?

Hi there, i am trying to shape a network for a college dorms... INTERNET---- ETH0--------Nat Box-------ETH1--------LAN I have set up classes of traffic (HTTP, FTP, MAIL, IM, OTHER) and i have assigned a rate for everyone with a HTB qdisc. The limit based in traffic is working flawlessly. However, under every HTB class i have set up a ESFQ queue discipline with hash value set to

Hello everyone, recently I've found something I consider a bug. Correct me if I'm wrong, but I always thought that Linux' EOL is 0x0A. Imagine my surprise when I saw that all messages that are being output on to the stderr (on any Linux I've tested - Fedora and Ubuntu) are terminated with 0x0D, 0x0A. Maybe that's standard behaviour of all stderr messages in all Linux

I am investigating changing our broadband bandwidth control scripts over to HFSC. What I would like to accomplish is this: { * DOWNLOAD * I need a download class for each user (we''ll call it Class 1) that offers a minimum of lets say 384Kbps and a maximum of 1.5Mbps. The rates between 384Kbps and 1.5Mbps should be shared among all users. Each user should always be able to get at

On our CentOS 7 servers I see there is a new kernel available when doing yum update: kernel 3.10.0-1062.12.1.el7 kernel-devel 3.10.0-1062.12.1.el7 However I am not able to find any announcement at redhat.com for this kernel. The only announcement I find is this from CentOS: https://www.mail-archive.com/centos-announce at centos.org/msg11573.html However that CentOS announcement links to

Destroy ACL-s on destination when no ACL-s differens between source and destination. Bug is somehow related with function send_file_name() called with negative file descriptor f. There is no such bug in 2.6.9 version, but there options "-X -A --deleted" can't be used (we have "Internal error: wrong write used in receiver."). If I fix this, avoid calling send_acl() &

Hello everybody. i have the folowing problem: i have this in the top of PREROUTING chain in mangle table iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -j CONNMARK --set-mark 0 # rule 1 iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -m connmark --mark 5 # rule 2 iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -m connmark --mark 6 # rule 3 i think when packet is passing trough my POSTROUTING in mangle table

Hi, How do you meter the amount of bandwidth a user has consumed (as webhosting companies do) under linux? I have searched everywhere, but have been unable to find a solution. Apologies if this is the wrong forum. Thanks, Patrick _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

> > Hi All, > > > > Customer is requesting 1 incoming toll free #, that dial out to 4 > > different terminating numbers, not ring all at once but ring #1, then > > #2, then #3, then #4, then back to #1 consecutively on inbound calls, > > regardless if someone is on #1. So this is not like a hunt group, > > more like an agent queue set with a round-robin

Hi, Using ctdb, is it a valid setup to have : CTDB_PUBLIC_ADDRESSES=/etc/ctdb/public_addresses containing only one ip address, thus with no round-robin. Is there a particular hard-coded limit that doesn't allow this? -- Nicolas Ecarnot

I was wondering if anyone has an easy way to emulate dialing in a round robin fashion like when you use Zap/r1 for Zap trunks. At the moment what I do is simply make a macro that will dial the sip trunks in order so if the first one fails it goes to the second and so on. The problem with this approach is that the first few SIP trunks will always be busy because of outgoing traffic. Is there an

I want to add another server to my existing Samba environment and use DNS round robin to do load balancing. Both will use same smb.conf. Is anyone out there using this kind of setup? I have few quick questions: 1. Can "interfaces" statement be used in DNS round robin. If yes, then how? 2. Should "preferred master= yes" be defined on both boxes? Thanks.

This is posed as a question more that a statement, so if you can show that I'm wrong, please feel free to correct / flame me. A couple of years ago, I identified a file corruption issue caused by two people attempting to edit the same file via two different Samba servers. The file was in a shared file space, mounted on both Samba servers via NFS. The problem, I believe, lies in the fact

> From: Martin Devera <devik@cdi.cz> > Subject: [LARTC] (E)SFQ suggestion > Hi, > just simple note. Maybe it is already in progress :) > > There are attempts to replace hashing routine in SFQ to > consider IPs or ports. > What about to use HRR - roundrobin around bunch of IP > adresses and then smaller WRR for ports per IP ? > It would solve both

Hello everybody, i have two gsm line (extra channels) and i'd like to schedule the outgoing calls with a round-robin strategy. If all the gsm lines are busy, the call must be sent to the pri lines with a linear strategy. here is the dialplan: exten => gsm,ChanIsAvail(EXTRA/r2&DAHDI/g1) same => n,GotoIf($["${AVAILORIGCHAN}" = ""]?unavail,1) same =>

Hi, Anyone knows if there is a way to play a list of sound file in a round robin mode (at specific interval) while someone in waiting in moh in a queue? Ok, you enter a queue and wait listening to moh, every X minutes a sound file is played from a list of sound files to be played. If that possible and if so how? Thanks for any pointers. Andre

Hello All, I've encountered a problem with OpenSSH_3.7.1p2 and krb5 authentication that I did not have using previous OpenSSH versions and krb5. I have a group of machines that are all listed as addresses for hostname.domain.blah via round-robin dns. When attempting to ssh to hostname.here.blah using krb5 auth, I get the following error: (client side) debug1: Authentications that can

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1008 ------- Additional Comments From dleonard at vintela.com 2005-06-08 22:16 ------- a workaround at http://blog.macnews.de/unspecific/stories/4581/ ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1008 simon at sxw.org.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |simon at sxw.org.uk ------- Comment #5 from simon at sxw.org.uk 2006-08-19 08:28 ------- There isn't an easy fix for this, at

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1008 ------- Comment #7 from jan.iven at cern.ch 2006-10-24 02:17 ------- Created an attachment (id=1202) --> (http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/attachment.cgi?id=1202&action=view) (simplified patch - no config option) Given that the GSSAPI library will (unconditionally) use DNS anyway, perhaps we don't need yet another client-side config

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1008 --- Comment #9 from Simon Wilkinson <simon at sxw.org.uk> 2007-09-15 20:59:25 --- I've noted this on the mailing list too, but just for the record, the simplified patch is incorrect. GSSAPI != Kerberos, and even within the Kerberos space, some vendors ship with canonicalisation disabled. If we are going to ship a workaround for