similar to: Apologies

Здравствуйте lartc-request, Friday, October 03, 2003, 8:44:37 AM, you wrote: lrmdn> Send LARTC mailing list submissions to lrmdn> lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl lrmdn> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit lrmdn> http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc lrmdn> or, via email, send a message with subject or body ''help'' to lrmdn>

Got some solutions myself. LAG is caused by : NETDEV WATCHDOG eth0 timeout this is caused bacause of problems with rtl8139 network card in kernel 2.6.x Solutions : 1.add in lilo.conf : append="noapic" 2.turn apic off in bios 3.if u have 2 rtl8139 cards, then exchange one with some other card type (chipset) btw. all above was found in various polish forums, but none has worked for

Hi Andreas! I mainly understand what you mean, I tried to fix something on the script, I don''t know if I did it well. Can you take another look on it please and if is wrong to make the corrections directly on it so that I see where the mistake is... With this script I want to make limits for IP class 85.120.48.0/25 for international traffic in 256 KBps classes and for metropolitan

https://www.p2pwatchdog.com/ > -----Original Message----- > From: lartc-admin@mailman.ds9a.nl > [mailto:lartc-admin@mailman.ds9a.nl] On Behalf Of Roy > Sent: Thursday, September 02, 2004 5:04 AM > To: Ing. Marcos Salvatierra; James Lista > Cc: lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl > Subject: Re: [LARTC] adsl and p2p programs > > This is most asked question but there is no good

here are some sites http://pupa.da.ru/imq/tc_tutorial.htm http://luxik.cdi.cz/~devik/qos/htb/manual/userg.htm Dominic On Wed, 2004-09-01 at 06:14, lartc-request@mailman.ds9a.nl wrote: > Send LARTC mailing list submissions to > lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc > or, via email,

Hi all, I have implemented a solution with a machine balancing the network load between two DSL providers as is explained in the LARTC Howto. It is apparently working correctly, but i have some problems. The problem is basically that some packets go out by each ADSL interface with the source address of the other ADSL interface. I think that the routing based on source address isn''t

Interesante !! lo probaste con 2.4 ? o 2.6 ? -> -----Mensaje original----- -> De: Esteban Ribicic [mailto:esteban@dejawu.com.ar] -> Enviado el: Lunes, 02 de Febrero de 2004 08:11 p.m. -> Para: ''ThE PhP_KiD'' -> Asunto: RE: [LARTC] limiting p2p -> -> -> Probaste layering 7 matching? -> -> -> -----Mensaje original----- -> De:

Hi Andreas! I mainly understand what you mean, but best for me would be if you could make an example from the script I have. I know I did something wrong into it, but I still can''t see the error. If you could fix the error from my script that would be much appreciated. Looking forward to hear from you, Daniel Phlander lartc-request@mailman.ds9a.nl wrote: Send LARTC mailing list

Здравствуйте lartc-request, Sunday, September 28, 2003, 8:45:03 AM, you wrote: lrmdn> Send LARTC mailing list submissions to lrmdn> lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl lrmdn> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit lrmdn> http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc lrmdn> or, via email, send a message with subject or body ''help'' to

I agree, but this is still better than crashing the machine... Aron -----Original Message----- From: Michael Renzmann [mailto:mrenzmann@otaku42.de] Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2004 1:33 PM To: Aron Brand Cc: lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl; roy@xxx.lt Subject: Re: [LARTC] RE: LARTC digest, Vol 1 #1558 - 9 msgs Hi. Aron Brand wrote: > does this. Another option would be to trick the kernel that the

What about some sort of DNAT redirection with iptables? - Greg -----Original Message----- From: Tobias [mailto:medlor@web.de] Sent: Friday, April 19, 2002 8:18 AM To: lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl Subject: Re: [LARTC] Routing based on source port - Solution ? Hello bert I have the same problem and tried all possibities i know. "ip rule" in fact doesnt route based on port because IP

Hi folks, i spent my whole day trying to set up my linux router using load balancing with multiple uplinks. I mainly focused on the nano howto, but somewhere I have a big mistake within my head. Basically the load-balancing is working, but not on a per-connection basis - just on a per packet basis. Practically this is not usable of course <g> But as far as I understood it should work..

Hi Nitin, First of all, you can verify that ntpd is responding on ingress with netcat : nc -u ingress 123 (udp connection on port 123) also try a netstat -an on ingress to be sure that the port 123 is in listen state... I recently install ntpdate, and it has worked as a client and a local ntp server immediatly. Good Luck, Yannick / Annecy in France -----Message d''origine----- De :

I want to limit each user in my network to have limited bandwidth (let''s say 256/128 kbit). I use NAT (done with iptables). Can I limit users on the outgoing interface using u32 using rules like: tc filter add dev eth0 parent 1: protocol ip prio 17 u32 match ip src 10.10.10.10 flowid 1:10 It seem I made a mistake somewhere or NAT is done before routing and I must use iptables

I thought of creating an htb class for each user, but as you said I haven''t got enough bw to do soo. That’s why my setup only has 5 classes with WRR queues so I get sure each user doesn’t affects the other users. On top of that I have an iplimit to a maximum of 15 parallel connections per user. So I get the following conclusions: A) change link B) upgrade to kernel 2.6 and use l7

Hello! I''d like to balance traffic from eth0 onto eth1 and eth2 going to different providers. As suggested on LARTC-howto, I''ve downloaded latest Julian''s route patches (kernel 2.4.24) and I''ve set up everything as described on http://www.ssi.bg/~ja/nano.txt (nano-howto). eth0 is the internal interface and eth1, eth2 are the interfaces connected to Internet.

I''m a tc newbie, and I think I am close to being able to use it to control one of the virtual web sites on our Gentoo Linux server. The site has it''s own IP address. I have a bit of a problem in that the way I originally configured tc, the busy site grabbed all the bandwidth, leaving none for the other (and more important) sites. Here is how I had configured it: tc

I have 3 ISP (I tried also with only two ISP) and I would split inbound traffic over all 3 real ip address (one per ISP). All 3 external ip are forwarded to an internal web server. I ''ve done all specified in the LARTC howto (4.2.1), but my firewall/router works fine only: 1. when I access from internet to the ip which is on the same interface of default gateway; 2. when I access

Hi anyone using sangoma hardware with lartc? pls let me know Thanks Imthiyaz Original Message: ----------------- From: lartc-request@mailman.ds9a.nl Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 12:00:07 +0200 (CEST) To: lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl Subject: LARTC Digest, Vol 28, Issue 23 Send LARTC mailing list submissions to lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit

Hi, my name is Grant Taylor. I am a subscriber to the LARTC mail list lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl. The LARTC mail lists has been plagued with viral email coming from changing IPs in your one of your subnets. Based on the fact that the WhoIs information below says that the subnet in question is a dial up pool this would explain the changing IPs. In less than 6 days the list has received 14 viral