similar to: rdoc error

authenticated_test_helper.rb: m. RDoc failure in vendor/plugins/acts_as_authenticated/generators/authenticated/te mplates/authenticated_test_helper.rb at or around line 113 column 4 Before reporting this, could you check that the file you''re documenting compiles cleanly--RDoc is not a full Ruby parser, and gets confused easily if fed invalid programs. The internal error was:

I''m having a wee bit of trouble building documentation for Edge Rails (rev 7187). When I attempt to run the doc:rails taask (or any doc:* task), I get the following error: -- BEGIN -- rake aborted! uninitialized constant RubyToken::AlreadyDefinedToken /Users/jherdman/Projects/crosslisting/vendor/rails/activerecord/ lib/../../activesupport/lib/active_support/dependencies.rb:263:in

This is on Debian stable. {{{ $sudo gem install rails Attempting local installation of ''rails'' Local gem file not found: rails*.gem Attempting remote installation of ''rails'' Updating Gem source index for: http://gems.rubyforge.org Install required dependency activesupport? [Yn] Install required dependency activerecord? [Yn] Install required dependency

People, I''m getting an error from Rake I''d like to debug. Here is a screendump: Fri Mar 20 23:28 /b/tmp/myfc23 maco$ rake doc:plugins:rspec (in /b/tmp/myfc23) rdoc -o doc/plugins/rspec --title ''Rspec Plugin Documentation'' --line- numbers --inline-source --charset utf-8 -T html vendor/plugins/rspec/ lib/autotest/discover.rb major-snip 95% [107/112]

Just got a brand new install of ruby-1.8.4 and new gems downloaded, specifically rails-1.0.0. Seems rails does not generated rdoc for gem_server. Looking into the problem, it seems that there is an error when doing ''rake rdoc'' for rails-1.0.0. % rake rdoc (in /opt/local/ruby-1.8.4/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rails-1.0.0) rm -r doc unrecognized option `--line-numbers --inline-source

I have a Gem on which the testing is done with RSpec. I would like to include the results of RSpec and the RCov html files in the RDoc. The problem is that when I have RDoc include the files, it winds up escaping all the html. Is there a way to get HTML into RDoc unprocessed? Or is there some other way I can distribute the RSpec/RCov results with my Gem integrated with RDoc? I can include

I''ve just setup mepis. It comes with 1.8.4. I though it would be easy to install Rails on it. So, I downloaded the ruby gems. But when I try to install it using ruby setup.rb. It cannot find Rdoc. I''ve tried apt-get install rdoc. This gives an ''rdoc not found in repository'' I''m now to Debian, and could us some help. Where can I get a copy of Rdoc?

I''ve whipped together this Emacs mode for editing rdoc files. It''s based off of generic-mode. I''ve set it to be active when you open README_FOR_APP or any .rdoc file. Share and enjoy. Jim -- Jim Menard, jim@io.com, jim.menard@gmail.com http://www.io.com/~jimm -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: rdoc-mode.el Type:

I''ve whipped together this Emacs mode for editing rdoc files. It''s based off of generic-mode. I''ve set it to be active when you open README_FOR_APP or any .rdoc file. Share and enjoy. Jim -- Jim Menard, jim@io.com, jim.menard@gmail.com http://www.io.com/~jimm -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: rdoc-mode.el Type:

Hi all, I would like to change my RDoc template to something similar to the RDocs on this site: http://caboo.se/doc.html Does any one know where this template (or similar) or other RDoc templates are available? I tried googling for rdoc templates for a long time and came up with nadda. Thanks in advance.

Hi everyone, I wrote a set of Mozilla Ubiquity commands that allow the user to search on rdocs, also featuring autocomplete, load of any rdoc hosted on the web and changing the default rdoc when searching. The project is hosted here: http://projects.talleye.com/ubiquity-rdoc and GitHub. Please, let me know any bug, suggestion, etc Luis Cipriani WebCo Internet brasigo.com.br

Guys, I''m working with the new RadRails release (0.5.3), which has a very nifty inclusion of ri courtesy of RDT. Problem is, although I''ve generated rdoc for all installed gems with "gem rdoc --all", it''s not accessible through ri. I see some posts here and there about rimport...is this still the necessary way to incorporate the rails rdoc into ri?

Hi all, This is just another quick email to let everyone know that I''ve updated the RDoc Dashboard Widget to fix all the reported bugs and add most of the requested features. The changes include: * Bug fixes for erratic scrolling and ''stuck'' navigation panes * The ability to have multiple instances of the RDoc widget on your dashboard * Bookmarking functionality for

The wiki for acts_as_ferret claims that the rdoc is available at http://projects.jkraemer.net/acts_as_ferret/rdoc, but that page 404s. Is the rdoc up somewhere? thanks, ryan -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

Hi, where can i find the rdoc for rspec-rails. The content of README-FIle of rspec_rails is: "See Spec::Rails" But i couldn''t find Spec::Rails on http://rspec.rubyforge.org/rdoc/ index.html (it is updated to 0.8.0) Best Hussein

Hi, where can i find the rdoc for rspec-rails. The content of README-FIle of rspec_rails is: "See Spec::Rails" But i couldn''t find Spec::Rails on http://rspec.rubyforge.org/rdoc/ index.html (it is updated to 0.8.0) Best Hussein

I recently noticed some anomalies in the Mocha RDoc. Within a method RDoc comment, any word that happens to be the same as a method in the same class gets turned into a link. You can see an example [2] with the word "once" and another [3] with the words "yields", "times" and "with". Does anyone know how to stop these words incorrectly being made into

Feature Requests item #10449, was opened at 2007-04-29 13:15 You can respond by visiting: http://rubyforge.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=221&aid=10449&group_id=35 Category: Documentation Group: None Status: Open Priority: 3 Submitted By: Evan Light (sleight42) Assigned to: Alex Fenton (brokentoy) Summary: RDoc Initial Comment: It would be hugely beneficial if wxRuby''s

I''m doing some housekeeping and just realised that the rdoc formatter produces gibberish: http://rspec.rubyforge.org/rdoc/files/EXAMPLES_rd.html Will anyone protest if I just go ahead and remove it? (I can''t imagine anyone using it, especially with the much better HTML formatter) Aslak

for many versions of ruby, and as many versions of rails, ive been unable to generate docs without deleting this file: lib/rails_generator/generators/components/controller/templates/controller.rb ruby just chews more and more memory until swap fils up and the system has to be reset.. m gems # rdoc --version RDoc V1.0.1 - 20041108 ruby --version ruby 1.8.5 (2006-06-22) [x86_64-linux]