similar to: Round Robin

I have 2 ADSL ad1 and ad2 , one PC for my firewall and some deamon on it with 3 ethernet : eth0 connect to my LAN ( 192.168.60.0/24 ) and 2 other connect to ad1 and ad2 |eth1 (10.0.1.2)--------------------ad1 ( ADSL 1 ) | My LAN(192.168.60.0/24) |---------eth0( 192.168.60.2)--> PC | |eth2 (10.0.2.2)---------------------ad2 (ADSL 2 ) All computer in LAN has default router =

Hello I have two DSL modems witch are connected to my isp, in future my boss want to buy another connection via DSL modem. Then i will have 3 DSL modems. With every DSL modem i get 3x8 IP`s (netmask 248) from my ISP, now i have question how to configure gateway wich tools should i use. Because ip route and next hop via. wich i use now makes his work fine but with new kernels there is an error

Hi, this might be a dumb question, but I''m not finding much information online. I''m trying to setup a 2.6 linux box to run nat across multiple upstream links as a simple way to aggregate bandwidth. I found the instructions in lartc section 4.2 (http://lartc.org/howto/lartc.rpdb.multiple-links.html) fairly clear and straightforward. I implemented those, and a couple of trivial

I''m moving to a new place and my new flatmate wants a router because he likes the cleaness of it all in a non geeky way which I can understand. This means it''s going to be hard for me to pursude him to let me run a computer as a router to act as bandwidth cop. But I don''t fancy trying to use ssh, VNC and games while he''s using WindowsUpdate or p2p. So I need

I am working on my Diploma Thesis on Computer Science Engineering. The main idea behind of my work is to make it possible to have a Linux box combining multiple ISP/network connections together providing a single connection with an aggregated bandwith. I have been surfing the Internet and I haven''t found anything like that running on Linux. I would like to implement it using iproute 2

hi all, i am setting up a load balancing netwrok with failover, i have applied julian patch, but whenever i try to traceroute from any client node, it gives me two entries for that destination, but i get different interface for that entries, so it doesn''t forward my requests, i have done masquerading for client nodes, the ip rule/route are as follows, ip rule add prio 222 table

[Off topic ?] Somebody can help me to convince some people to use Linux instead MikroTik ???? Happy new year. Andres.

Hi! In our students'' hostel we have 6 DSL lines (dialups to different providers); we have set up a linux box (currently running 2.6.11-rc2-mm2, but the problem described hereafter also applies to previous 2.6-series kernels) with help from http://lartc.org/howto/lartc.rpdb.multiple-links.html#AEN298 Our Setup looks like this: 10.0.0.0/8 10.70.255.1 +----------+ +-----------+ |

Just wondering if someone could answer this question for me. I would like to route public addresses only. Their will be no firewall but maybe a few rules to deny certain types of traffic. Here is the configuration of the router. My provider gave a me a /30 link to their router also they gave me a /25 network for my customers public ip''s Their cisco router has static route entrys for my

Hello I have the following problem: LAN<--->LINUX_ROUTER<--> 2 internet gateways gateway1: adsl gateway2: ppp connection I want the following Machines from LAN going to Internet tcp port 80 :-> gateway1 Machines from LAN goint to Internet tcp port 22 :-> gateway2 Everything else: -> gateway1 How can I acomplish this? I am using kernel 2.4.24 Can I combine dead gateway

You want multiple IP Addresses for email if you are hosting more than one domain. The reason is, everyone now checks for reverse DNS with email so you need a different public IP Address for each email domain. This way, all the reverse DNS translations will be unique. For apache, you can have multiple websites sharing the same IP Address as long as you don''t do anything with SSL. SSL

Hi, This may sound crazy but I will go ahead anyway. Here's my scenario: ifconfig bond0 10.10.10.1 netmask 255.0.0.0 ifenslave bond0 eth0 ifenslave bond0 eth1 brctl addbr stp0 brctl addif stp0 bond0 brctl stp stp0 on Is this a valid scenario? I am trying to bond two interfaces and run STP over the bonded interface..The problem I am trying to solve is to run STP over aggregated links

HI All. I have a linux box connected to a switch network with 2 network interfaces, how would I able to ''trunk'' these 2 interfaces? options I can see are: - ethernet bonding - iproute2? - teql Which one are the best to use? I''m curretly having problem with ethernet bonding, my setup are as follow: ip add: 192.168.10.30/24 I do: # modprobe bonding # ip addr add

Hi guys, I am trying to get bonding work on a debian etch system. I searched already in the mailing list but unfortunately I couldnt find a proper solution. This is what i did so far. - Installed Debian Etch on my server - Installed the following packages for using Xen from the Debian repository: xen-hypervisor-3.0.3-1-i386-pae linux-image-2.6.18-5-xen-686 linux-image-2.6.18-5-xen-686 xen-tools

Greetings all. This has been an ongoing issue for me for a few months, and I''ve been trying to get an answer. My server has two NICs, and I want to set up the following: NICs (x2) -> bond (mode 5) -> Xen Bridge -> Doms ...however, trying to configure this doesn''t seem to work: network-bridge steals eth0 instead of bond0, which breaks the bond AND my networking. The

I''m using bonding in active-fallback mode to guarantee maximum availability on some critical servers. The mii mode is active so I can detect things like dead card and/or unplugged cable even on the inactive slave. But how do I check that the inactive slave is properly configured/connected to the switch/vlan? I ask this question because it has just bitten me in a part I''ll keep

Hi all, i have a xen 4.3 installation and would like to have a bridge bond szenario: *** eth0 eth1 | | bond0 | br0 | vif = [ ''bridge=br0,mac=xx:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx'' ] *** With the network script in debian wheezy *** /etc/network/interfaces auto bond0 iface bond0 inet manual slaves eth0 eth1

Setting up bonding in active-backup mode 1 (using ARP monitoring) on a server, it looked OK, but pulling the active link cable didn't actually work, it didn't fail over. Eventually with manual playing around with modprobe, ifconfig, ifenslave, etc., a solution was stumbled upon: enslave the eth1 device before eth0, and all is good. Why this should matter is a puzzle - I could not find

Right now, you can configure most bridge device parameters via sysfs. However, you cannot either: - add or remove bridge interfaces - add or remove physical interfaces from a bridge The attached patch set rectifies this. With this patch set, brctl (theoretically) becomes completely optional, much like ifenslave is now for bonding. (In fact, the idea for this patch, and the syntax used herein, is

Hi all, My app is going to count sth based on poll id in the url. The url looks like: http://address.com?id=dwNKiItvcyrQ5sycnIhmJablDfXsc9tshaGIVyNIei7.e7&some_other_parameters In a controller, I''ve created a hash where the keys are the ids: @codes = { ''dwNKiItvcyrQ5sycnIhmJablDfXsc9tshaGIVyNIei7.e7'' => {:partner_id => 0,