similar to: Multiple Uplink/Providor w/VPN?

Hello all, I have browsed archives and real all available HOWTOs, but I still have a few doubts. My set up is a router, as below. LAN(100MB)-------------(eth1)Linux-Router(eth0)---------------WAN(2MB/512) My aim is to cotrol both uplink and downlink bandwidth. For uplink control, I will use HTB on WAN interface. For downlink, I plan to attach HTB on LAN interface(both egress/outgoing). No

Hello! I have access server with 4 uplinks (nice, huh?). I ran RedHat 7.3. Yesterday I did an upgrade to RedHat 9. After upgrade Linux says the third link is bad: # ip route show 2.2.2.0/30 dev eth2 scope link src 2.2.2.2 4.4.4.0/30 dev eth4 scope link src 4.4.4.4 3.3.3.0/29 dev eth3 scope link src 3.3.3.3 1.1.1.0/28 dev eth1 scope link src 1.1.1.1 10.1.1.0/24 dev eth0 scope link

I''ve been trying - without success - to aggregate the bandwidth of 3 DSL modems using the instructions in the HowTo (sections 4.2.1 and 4.2.2). I _believe_ I''m following the instructions to the letter, but when I add the last command (the "ip route" with "nexthop") then nothing goes out through the modems. Each modem works when I add a single default gateway

Been running this for quite a while and noticed that have intermittent problems getting out. Find that if I ping the same site from 2 computers it may work on one and fail on the other. Also was surprised that some time they are going out different interfaces at the same time. Seems to work all the time from the firewall. Running 2.6.10 kernel with the multipath routing patches on a debian

Please reply if you have any solutions to this problem! In this setup there are four computers: C1 --- local lan -----(eth1) C2 (eth0)------- internet --------- (eth0) C3 (eth1) ---- local lan -------- C4 | | |-(tap0)-----------------------------------------encrypted tunnel (VPN) --------------------(tap0)-| Computers 1,4 = win98 (called windows machines hereafter) Computers 2,3 = linux

Yes you can. Please use newer version of centos and strong/openswan. Eero 21.3.2016 7.05 ip. "Glenn Pierce" <glennpierce at gmail.com> kirjoitti: > Hi I hope someone can answer something I'm sure is quite basic. > > I am following the instructions at > https://www.centos.org/docs/5/html/Deployment_Guide-en-US/ch-vpn.html > On setting up a VPN > > The part

Hi, I had a look at this page which describes a single VPN zone called "vpn": http://www.shorewall.net/IPSEC-2.6.html Is this the most current information? It is the top page found by Google for "shorewall ipsec" Is there any information about setting up multiple VPN zones for different classes of road warrior? E.g. lets say there are two classes of road warrior:

On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 1:17 PM, Mike - st257 <silvertip257 at gmail.com> wrote: > I second Eero's comment, use a new IPSec daemon. > > Openswan was forked and became Libreswan. Paul, now a RH employee, was a > main developer for the Openswan project before he and others created the > Libreswan fork. > https://libreswan.org/ > > EL6 has Openswan > EL7 has

To be fair its not highly sensitive info we are dealing with. -----Original Message----- From: "Eero Volotinen" <eero.volotinen at iki.fi> Sent: ?21/?03/?2016 17:51 To: "CentOS mailing list" <centos at centos.org> Subject: Re: [CentOS] IPSec multiple VPN setups Err. Sounds like security nightmare. 21.3.2016 7.47 ip. "Glenn Pierce" <glennpierce at

Will ask my boss :) We are hosted on memset so not so easy to update Thanks On 21 March 2016 at 17:36, Eero Volotinen <eero.volotinen at iki.fi> wrote: > Centos 5 is still soon end of life. Using it as ipsec gateway is .. > > Eero > 21.3.2016 7.25 ip. "Mike - st257" <silvertip257 at gmail.com> kirjoitti: > >> On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 1:17 PM, Mike -

Can I setup multiple vpn (e.g. openvpn and pptn) on a Shorewall ? If yes, just follow Shorewall guideline to setup those two vpn on a Shorewall? Thank _______________________________________ YM - 離線訊息 就算你沒有上網，你的朋友仍可以留下訊息給你，當你上網時就能立即看到，任何說話都冇走失。 http://messenger.yahoo.com.hk

Hi, all. My subject line says it all: is there a WiFi SIP phone with VPN abilities? Failing that, a WiFi phone that runs Linux? I already know one phone that does meet my requirements -- the iPhone. The new software comes with a Cisco VPN client, and a SIP client can be had from third-party vendors for jailbroken phones. And, while I'm not averse to the idea, a) it ain't cheap, and b)

Yes reinstall. I get you have to purchase a new instance for a time to move over. -----Original Message----- From: "Eero Volotinen" <eero.volotinen at iki.fi> Sent: ?21/?03/?2016 18:38 To: "CentOS mailing list" <centos at centos.org> Subject: Re: [CentOS] IPSec multiple VPN setups err. upgrades? You mean reinstall? As upgrading between major releases are not

Hi I hope someone can answer something I'm sure is quite basic. I am following the instructions at https://www.centos.org/docs/5/html/Deployment_Guide-en-US/ch-vpn.html On setting up a VPN The part I am having trouble with is when it show the /etc/racoon/racoon.conf file. But it doesn't say whay you have to do with this file. When I bring up my connection ifup bicester I get RTNETLINK

I have been testing wondershaper 1.1a with htb. DOWNLINK=2304 UPLINK=1024 DEV=wlan0 No other changes have been made, except to comment out the 2 lines to allow the script to run. When I do a speed test from sites like www.toast.net/performance, I only get speeds equal to my UPLINK speed. I expected a speed closer to the DOWNLINK. Am I missing something here? TIA, -- -Wes Hegge Technical

Hi guys! Im new there, and i havent found yet stories about uplink bandwith limits, and i would like to limit my Exim''s speed, coz its eating my ADSL''s whole uplink. Til now i used the #:~ tc qdisc add dev ppp0 root tbf rate 50kbit latency 50ms burst 1540 command, buts its limiting the whole link:/ I checked the documents on that link:

Hi everyone, I''m controling the uplink traffic bandwidth between two ethernet linux computers, but it seems like even the download bandwidth gets limited then i''ve got trouble on that because my intention is  shaping the conection on an asymetric way (ADSL).  Lately, I''m going crazy, this problem has got me pretty worried and i''m not figuring out at all, the

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN"> <html> <head> <meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"> </head> <body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000"> <font size="-1"><font face="Verdana">Hi all!<br> <br> Hopefully

Hi all, Given below ia the simple network diagram. I need to control uplink for the individual private network IPs as depicted in the diagram. Is this possible in a NATed environment using CBQ or HTB. I learnt that we can control only outgoing traffic. So if I control in the eth1 interface the source IP will be masqueraded, and it may not result in the desired behaviour. Is there a solution to

Hello, I''m following this HOWTO http://linux-ip.net/html/adv-multi-internet.html to route outgoing SSH from a secondary ISP. I can see using tcpdump,jnettop,iftop that when one of the computers located in my internal network is trying to SSH to a box online using SSH, packets are routed via the secondary internet ethernet card. However, packets don''t seem to know how to get back.