similar to: can''t understand strange PRIO behaviour

Dzien Dobry Is there some error witch iproute2-050929.tar.gz becouse when i compile I don''t get tc I have kernel 2.6.12.3 this is my log with compile # make make[1]: Entering directory `/home/src/a/04102005/iproute2-050929/lib'' gcc -D_GNU_SOURCE -O2 -Wstrict-prototypes -Wall -I../include -DRESOLVE_HOSTNAMES -c -o ll_map.o ll_map.c gcc -D_GNU_SOURCE -O2 -Wstrict-prototypes

i tried to cross compile iproute2 on a linux machine using a cross compiler for ppc750. i have some questions: 1) make tries to execute tc/normal, tc/paretonormal, tc/pareto to make distribution files like normal.dist because i am cross compiling the object files can''t be executed. will it suffice if i copy the distribution files from my linux iproute2 compilation to the /usr/lib/tc

Hi, I have a box with RH 7,2 upgraded to Fedora Core 1. with: kernel 2.4.26 iptables 1.2.9 gcc 3.2.2 In this momment I''m using a binary TC version, but when I try to compile, get errors in Make process. Any hints ? Bests. Andres. ----> iproute2-2.4.7-now-ss010824.tar.gz make[1]: Cambiando a directorio `/usr/local/src/iproute2/lib'' gcc -D_GNU_SOURCE -O2

Hi again, I was just looking around for ESFQ sources, and I see that the main site is down, and only has kernel 2.6.4 patches. Is ESFQ maintained? If so, where can I find patches for 2.6.10? Thanks, -justin _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

I am wondering whether the commands ''tc filter change'' and ''tc filter replace'' are working. Googling around revealed a few emails on the LARTC stating that unfoirtunately they do not work. A quick check showed that they are still not implemented (properly). Some propose a solution to build a second tree of filters and apply the 2nd one when a need for it

I thought I had this all worked out, but it seems not. The following tc configuration: tc qdisc del dev ppp0 root 2> /dev/null > /dev/null tc qdisc add dev ppp0 root handle 1: tbf rate 120kbit burst 1200 limit 1 tc qdisc add dev ppp0 parent 1:1 handle 2: prio bands 3 tc qdisc add dev ppp0 parent 2:1 handle 10: sfq perturb 20 tc qdisc add dev ppp0 parent 2:2 handle 20: sfq perturb 20 tc

hello to all i''m trying to set a filter but doesn''t want to work. i''ve set ut the qdiscs and the classes like this : tc qdisc add dev ppp0 root handle 1: htb default 20 tc class add dev ppp0 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 120kbit tc class add dev ppp0 parent 1:1 classid 1:20 htb rate 30kbit ceil 120kbit tc class add dev ppp0 parent 1:1 classid 1:21 htb rate 30kbit ceil

Hello, I have Asterisk version: Asterisk SVN-branch-11-r420435 I have the following code: exten => 303,1,NoOp(Dialing ${EXTEN}) ? ? ? ? same => n,NoOp(DBKey = ${DBKey}) ? ? ? ? same => n,DB_DELETE(office/${DBKey}) ? ? ? ? ? same => n,Playback(auth-thankyou) ? ? ? ? same => n,Hangup() And I get the following error: [2014-08-09 18:00:30] WARNING[4338][C-00000067]: pbx.c:4869

Hi, I have done this setup to give the machine 192.168.1.4 (masqueraded over dialup) the highest priority: #! /bin/bash WHAT="add" iptables -A PREROUTING -i eth0 -s 192.168.1.1 -t mangle -j MARK --set-mark 1 iptables -A PREROUTING -i eth0 -s 192.168.1.4 -t mangle -j MARK --set-mark 4 tc qdisc $WHAT dev ppp0 root handle 1: prio bands 3 priomap 0 1 2 tc qdisc $WHAT dev ppp0 parent 1:1

Hello Mailing list, I have a problem with the prio qdisc and I don´t know what is wrong in my configuration This ist a sample configuration and looks like this: #include "fields.tc" #include "ports.tc" #define X16(i) i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i dev ppp0 { dsmark { prio(bands 6, priomap X16($be)) { class if ip_proto == IPPROTO_UDP;

Hey guys, I'm trying to create an apache 2.4.12 rpm file. But in order to do that I need to create an apr-util rpm of a recent enough version to support it. So running the rpmbuild command against the spec file I'm getting this error: checking db1/db.h usability... no checking db1/db.h presence... no checking for db1/db.h... no checking db.h usability... no checking db.h presence...

Hi all, I have noticed that the "CONFIG_NETLINK" has been removed since kernel version 2.4.17, does this mean that we cannot use "arpd" with kernel versions 2.4.17 onwards. vishy _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

I started the massive transfer based on the historical timings, but now I am facing lots of problems in the transfer...I am getting lot of errors like this.. This is a very critical production update I have only 3 weeks time to complete this 4 tb transfer that was taken from historical times using rsync rsync: writefd_unbuffered failed to write 4813 bytes: phase "unknown" [sender]:

I''ve got a linux router pushing 600-1000 pppoe connections through it. I''m getting a screen error "Neighbor Table Overflow" after this box has been up for between 1 week and 1 month. When this is happening, routing slows to a crawl if at all. Then dies. I''ve added: # Added to stop "neighbor table overflow" messages in the kernel

what is the limit on the arp cache entires ?! Does someone have very big LANs with linux-routers ? How big ? (i mean flat L2 network, not segmented) I want to know how much can my net can scale ? thanx _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

Hi, Sorry to bother you all. I have a typical problem sharing DSL upstream bandwidth with users. I have 3 types of traffic high-priority, medium-priority and low priority. My upstream rate is 960kbits. Traffic (any priority) can vary in bandwidth from 0 to 960kbits. I have a test setup where I can pump 600kbit of high priority sustained and I have 400kbit of low priority traffic sustained. I

Hello, I have been playing around with Remus on Xen 4.0.1, attempting to fail-over for an HVM domU. I''ve run into some problems that I think could be related to tapdisk2 and its interaction with how one sets up Remus disk replication in the domU config file. A few things I''ve noticed: -The tap:remus:backupHostIP:port|aio:imagePath notation does not work for me, although this

Hi All, I want to test REMUS over XEN, I would like to know the basic steps to be followed . I have installed xen4.1 on debian and i didn''t find any command related to remus, is there any steps which i have to carry out? _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

Dear List, i''m experimenting with remus with the following setup. dom0: - Debian Squeeze - Jeremy''s 2.6.38.48 kernel - xen 4.1.2 recompiled from sid - DRBD for block device backend domU - Debian Squeeze Remus is working fine unless i try to give more than 1 core to the domU. Here''s the error from remus when i''m trying to enable it for an SMP domU:

Hi, i already tried to ask this and did not obtain any answer. Is remus is supported in Opensuse Linux actually ? Regards _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users