similar to: reading ufs2 filesystems with centosplus kernel

Hi Dears, I am having trouble mounting a partition with UFS file system (FreeBSD), I am trying to build with the following commands: mount-r-t-o ufs ufstype = ufs2 / dev/hdb1 / part mount-r-t-o ufs ufstype = 44bsd / dev/hdb1 / part But appears the following error message: mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on / dev/hdb1, missing codepage or other error In some

[originally reported for ZFS on FreeBSD but Pawel Jakub Dawid says this problem also exists on Solaris hence this email.] Summary: on ZFS, overhead for reading a hole seems far worse than actual reading from a disk. Small buffers are used to make this overhead more visible. I ran the following script on both ZFS and UF2 filesystems. [Note that on FreeBSD cat uses a 4k buffer and md5 uses a 1k

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1564983 Because Mount.mount_vfs was declared with the wrong type signature it could never be called correctly from outside the daemon. The root cause of this problem is that the generator doesn't generate the type signatures automatically (which it could do, and fairly easily). Therefore there are probably other similar bugs waiting to be found.

From: Raphael S. Carvalho <raphael.scarv at gmail.com> Change since v1: * Fix bug on dentry structure (thank you specification; btw, sarcasm), and consequently a bug on ufs_readdir. * Add readlink support (applied tests for symlinks whose destionation path were stored in blk pointers and the file itself). * Several improvements. Wrote the documentation below. I think it would be good to

There is a confusion about the name of this file system, then I decided to contact the author (Kirk McKusick) who replied: "The name has always been confusing (my bad). The code is broken into two parts, the part that handles naming (UFS where the U stands for Unix), and the part that handles disk layout (FFS where the F stands for Fast). When the two parts are put together they are called

From: Raphael S. Carvalho <raphael.scarv at gmail.com> Wrote the documentation below. I think it would be good to push the doc to the wiki as soon as the UFS support gets merged. Unix Fast File System (UFS/FFS) 1/2 on Syslinux - (usage/install) ----- There is a confusion about the name of this file system, then I decided to contact the author who replied: "The name has always been

I'm trying to setup an external journal device, but it won't mount as ext3. I can only mount it as ext2. Everything seems happy when I run the commands. It will work when I don't use the external device. This is on RH7.2, linux-2.4.18-rc2. [root@dhcp4 root]# mke2fs -O journal_dev /dev/hdb5 [root@dhcp4 root]# mke2fs -j -J device=/dev/hdb5 /dev/hdb6 [root@dhcp4 root]# mount -t ext3

After upgrading my Debian box to Samba 3.0.23, I'm no longer able to connect to it from my Mac OS X 3.9 machine. I can still connect from the linux box TO the mac, but not the other way around. I need to be able to mount the linux volume on the mac. I've had to downgrade to samba 3.0.22 on linux to get it to work. My home network is a simple 2 machine setup with a wired connection. My

On May 25, 2014 3:39 AM, "Geert Stappers" <stappers at stappers.nl> wrote: > > > While going throug old posts found: > > Op 2013-08-31 om 17:01 schreef Raphael S.Carvalho: > > Calc the size of ldlinux.sys from ldlinux.bin, and check if it exceeds the limit. > > ldlinux.sys must fit between the bootsector and two copies of ADV whose size may vary. >

Hi everyone, lately I've been getting familiar with library and working on slight re-layering of the library. It's about having locking layer in public API and tracing one layer below that (let's call it __t_ layer. I'm not very good at making up names, so this is temporary:) ). Then making sure that all generated public stuff call __t_ layer and all other internal stuff

Hi, This is my first post to this list. I have been backing up some files with rsync from My Mac OS X 10.4.7 machine, which uses HFS+ filesystem to a FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE machine, which uses UFS2 filesystem. They go across a 100-base-T lan, which has little or no traffic on it. On my Mac, I mount the nfs exported volume on the FreeBSD machine with: $ mount -t nfs moe:/backup

It's needed to enumerate both UFS1/2 since they have different magic numbers and super block offsets. Besides, UFS2 can be installed in the 0-64k range like BTRFS, whereas UFS1 can't. Signed-off-by: Raphael S.Carvalho <raphael.scarv at gmail.com> --- extlinux/main.c | 71 +++++++++--- extlinux/ufs.h | 26 ++++ extlinux/ufs_fs.h | 307

> On May 25, 2014 3:39 AM, "Geert Stappers" <stappers at stappers.nl> wrote: > > > > > > While going throug old posts found: > > > > Op 2013-08-31 om 17:01 schreef Raphael S.Carvalho: > > > Calc the size of ldlinux.sys from ldlinux.bin, and check if it exceeds > the limit. > > > ldlinux.sys must fit between the bootsector and

Hello Richard and all, (continuing from https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2014-September/msg00112.html ). I'm experimenting with libguestfs on non-linux VMs, encountered errors on FreeBSD9.3 and MINIX3 (and few others, but these ones are easy to share), with host Ubuntu 14.04.01 LTS x86-64. Attached are logs from "virt-inspector -v -x" for each VM. The images are here:

From: Michael Scherer <misc at zarb.org> Without this, configure will always enable erlang, no matter what argument are passed. Now, we can disable it, even if configure still need the erlang compiler for some obscure reason. --- configure.ac | 10 ++++++---- 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac index 337a3ed..e0bed2f 100644 ---

I've tried to create a Linux swap file, but when I run fdisk, it looks like this: Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System /dev/hdb1 * 1 3644 29270398+ 83 Linux /dev/hdb2 3645 3737 747022+ f W95 Ext'd (LBA) /dev/hdb5 3645 3737 746991 82 Linux swap Why is this W95 partition existing in the

> ]You seem to be assuming that changing from a direct SATA and IDE > ] connections to some USB adapter would have no impact on how the > ] respective HDDs are recognized/detected by the BIOS. > > ] You seem to be > ] assuming that the BIOS from 2 different PCs/Laptops would recognize all > ] your devices in the same exact way and that there would be no changes > ] in

Ok, this is the case: I've got two raid-5 arrays with software raid, both with three disks. Setup: md0 has hdb2, hdd1 and sda1 md1 has hdb5, hdd3 and sda3 Tonight, the system lost power due to a power spike. The result was a reboot where it attempted to fix the raid, but it didn't exactly work. I have now booted a live CD and using utilities there. It seems the checksum value is

Hi all, I am playing with a test box at the moment running a Samba 2.2.7a domain on FreeBSD 5.0. I wish to enable ACLs, but I am not exactly sure what I am supposed to expect once they are enabled. I have created a UFS2 partition and enabled ACL support using tunefs. Since doing that, I have been able to connect to the Samba shares and modify ACLs, but so far the only things I have been able to

Calc the size of ldlinux.sys from ldlinux.bin, and check if it exceeds the limit. ldlinux.sys must fit between the bootsector and two copies of ADV whose size may vary. Thus, the size of ldlinux.sys (limit) can be at most: 65536 - 2 * ADV_SIZE - 512. Certain file systems (such as BTRFS and UFS2) will rely on ldlinux.sys being installed on the 0-64k range, thus it can't exceed the limit,