similar to: Htb, imq and sfq traffic shaping

Hello, I run one of my PCs as my personal router, with iptables+tc to control traffic and be my firewall. In TC, I use a combination of htb, qdisc and sfq (as well as prio) to classify bandwidth. In my current setup, I have 10 classifications of my bandwidth. (Even I admit this is probably more than I need, but at this point I''m still learning, so I''ll just leave them be.)

Hi, I installed Samba 2.0.3 on Linux 2.2.5. Every time I reboot system I found the smb has not been started. But in the directory /etc/rc.d, the file "smb" exists. When I run "smb restart",after a while, the samba server is ok. I wonder why the samba server is not up when system reboot. Thanks a lot. Followed is the content of the file "smb": #! /bin/sh ..

Is it better to start Samba using in initd, or to use the script, much like the one provided by SuSE. ?? so far I have used the script, but I don't like the fact of having to start samba manually. I would much prefer to see it run as a service. just to confirm all it really involves is starting smbd and nmbd Rowan [TSS] Gerber Scientific Products http://www.gspinc.com

Dear List, I thought it might be useful if I wrote up my notes on getting an MGE UPS to work with NUT and openSUSE. The MGE UPS (an Ellipse 1500 USB) will work well with NUT and openSUSE 10.2, but not "out-of-the-box": there are some things you need to do: Intro. MGE have built rpms of NUT which greatly simplify installation. Merci MGE. I used the rpm's for nut-2.0.5 and the

This patch adds a safety verification to configure_from_network function, where network configuration will not be performed if it is already up and running, preventing lost of communication for connections already established. Signed-off-by: Ricardo Marin Matinata <matinata at br.ibm.com> --- scripts/ovirt-early | 9 ++++++--- scripts/ovirt-functions | 7 +++++++ 2 files changed,

As requested by Mark Williamson in BZ #681 Signed-off-by: Gawain Lynch <gawain.lynch@gmail.com> --- xendomains.orig 2006-06-17 14:35:48.000000000 +1000 +++ xendomains 2006-06-17 14:45:29.000000000 +1000 @@ -207,10 +207,11 @@ if [ "$XENDOMAINS_RESTORE" = "true" ] && contains_something "$XENDOMAINS_SAVE" then + XENDOMAINS_SAVED=`/bin/ls

How can i redirect all traffic that not come from port 80 to a flow ? i was thing about some like tc filter add dev imq1 parent 1: protocol ip prio 7 u32 match ip sport !80 ...... But this not work. Another doubt, if i have two rules that intersects , for example , one filter with u32 match ip src 10.10.10.10 flowid 1:10 and other with u32 match sport 80 0xffff flowid 1:11 , which one will

Hi All, I''m trying to create a contended section of bandwidth using IMQ. I have the imq0 device up and running, with traffic passing through it. Firstly, I need to throttle the entire device imq0 to 2mbit/s. I would then like to add throttle rules for individual IP addresses, allowing them to pass up to 512kbit/s each, as long as imq0 has not reached its 2mbit/s. The configuration

On 2/19/07, Salatiel Filho <salatiel.filho@gmail.com> wrote: > Well , thanks to imq all my client machines are now shaped and > everything is great ... > But now i have a doubt , is there a way to shape the traffic that goes > to the route [doing a wget from the router for example ]? > > > I have a PREROUTING IMQ0 and a POSTROUTING IMQ1 , everything is > working like

Hi, we're running the standard linux bridge setup (redundant bridge) for 5 years now. So first of all, thanks to everyone involved for implementing the bridging feature in Linux. Now I'm trying to bridge hosts connected to VLAN'ed Cisco switches using linux bridge. I'm testing the following setup (Kernel 2.6.19, bridge-utils 1.2 on both bridges)

Package: xen-utils-common Version: 4.4.1-5 Severity: important Dear Maintainer, I tried to upgrade xen-utils-4.4 depending on xen-utils-common. Here is aptitude answer: ... Param?trage de xen-utils-common (4.4.1-5) ... insserv: Service xenstored has to be enabled to start service xendomains insserv: Service xenconsoled has to be enabled to start service xendomains insserv: exiting now!

I''m using HFSC to limit bandwidth for our wireless customers. However, I''d also like the bandwidth prioritized based on packet type. This is what I''m trying right now, and I''d just like some input from anyone out there knowledgeable in this on whether it does what I want it to do: Eth1 -> HFSC ........|-> HFSC (User1) (Min 512 Kb, Max 1024 Kb, Burst 1536

i''m trying to limit upload and download but something is wrong(it is about NAT) i will post here my "script" maybe someone could tell me what is wrong my kernel(2.6.9) is patch with imq(linuximq.net) and my iptables(1.2.11) also #flush tc qdisc del dev eth0 root tc qdisc del dev eth1 root tc qdisc del dev imq0 root tc qdisc del dev imq1 root ifconfig imq0 down

Hello to all people there . Can i guarantee ICMP respond time no metter how loaded is internet line . i have typical NATed enviroiment like External IP |linux router| LAN - 192.168.0.0/24 i have example setup with IMQ but is it possible to be done also if i attache htb to eth0 and eth1 for example . if i start shaper ping i better that without shaper but it''s not guarantted i mean

Hy shorewall users :)) I have the following config in my shorewall: DNAT net:200.137.193.2 loc:192.168.0.55 udp 135,445 - 200.137.193.38 DNAT net:200.137.193.2 loc:192.168.0.55 udp 137:139 - 200.137.193.38 DNAT net:200.137.193.2 loc:192.168.0.55 tcp 135,139,445 - 200.137.193.38 The IP

Folks, I''m so surprised what happened to my box just in the few weeks lately. Here is my setup: INTERNET <----------> [eth0] SHAPER-BOX [eth1] <----------> USER-FARM both eth0 & eth1 got public ips (202.x.x.x) Why traffic monitored at eth0 is bigger than eth1 ? eth1 shaped just exactly the same as rate i defined in HTB. I just have 1024Kbps from my ISP and i defined the

I set up an ipsec/racoon vpn tunnel test environment. The gateway machines are 192.168.0.30 and 192.168.0.31 on the external adaptor and 10.0.1.1 and 10.0.2.1 internally. The test workstations are 10.0.1.10 and 10.0.2.10. The tunnel seems to be working as in 10.0.1.10 can talk to 10.0.2.10 an vice versa and they can both use the net via NAT, however 192.168.0.30 and 192.168.0.31 cannot directly

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23092 Summary: Syslog flooded with "nouveau 0000:01:00.0: Unhandled PFIFO_INTR - 0x00000010" Product: xorg Version: 7.4 Platform: x86 (IA32) OS/Version: Linux (All) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: medium Component:

Hello, Hope everyone is enjoying their holiday! We setup two asterisk servers (From CVS on Wednesday) and set up IAX between the two. Right now they both reside on a switch with a static 192.168.0.x IP address. The first Server is .5 and the second is .30. Our dialplan seems to be working, however on the console we get a flurry of NOTICE and WARNING messages. NOTICE[1116941120]: File

Hi, i am running imq + htb on my router , the situation is like this eth0 = uplink to my provider eth1 = 1st customer eth2 = 2nd customer eth3 = 3th customer eth0 has limit 512 and i want to share this between eth1 eth2 and eth3 , but not working , this is the script i used, \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ #!/bin/sh