similar to: Simply_helpful and nested resources

Hello, I''m testing beta of scriptaculous and I''ve got a stange behaviour. I''m using this RJS : page << "$(''content'').morph({width:''308px''}, {duration:0.5});" page.replace_html ''subcontent'', :partial => ''sub'' page.replace_html ''nav_path'', nav_path

Looking over the discussions and Trac tickets am I correct in assuming that the simply_helpful''s form_for not respecting the default_url_options (specifically only_path) is a side-effect of some other default behavior choices? Personally, I set only_path to true as my default as I think except were you are dealing with https it makes life much easier (especially in testing) and is just

Hello, I''ve just posted a patch to the Trac. It intends to simplify the use of url helpers such as link_to when you use the :host option. When you''re using a helper such as link_to and that you provide a :host option to it, it''s not use by default, you have to set :only_path to false too to enable it (to have the full URL, not the relative one). This tiny patch

Does anyone have view specs running on edge with simply_helpful? I tried http://blog.methodmissing.com/2006/11/23/using-simply_helpful-with-rspec-controller-tests/but it seems that was written for pre-9 versions. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/rspec-users/attachments/20070420/0bc8d366/attachment.html

Hi, Here''s two blog posts for those that need to test respond_to blocks and/or are currently using simply_helpful extensively. http://blog.methodmissing.com/2006/11/22/testing-different-content- types-with-rspec http://blog.methodmissing.com/2006/11/23/using-simply_helpful-with- rspec-controller-tests - Lourens

Hi ! I was talking to a seasider and he asked me if it was easy to do the following thing using rails : 1) ask a number to the user 2) ask a second number 3) give the addition of the two number and a link to be able to replay All these things have to be done in one controller and one action, there is no need for verification and other stuff. I tried but I''ve got some problems

Hi All I''m having some problems running my view specs when using simply_helpful. I have it semi-working via the following: module SimplyHelpfulHelper def self.included(base) base.send :include, SimplyHelpful::RecordIdentificationHelper base.send :include, SimplyHelpful::RecordTagHelper end end context "The index template" do setup do @shift =

Hi all, a very cool info for all french readers of this list. RailsFrance (http://www.railsfrance.org) is organizing a Ruby On Rails meeting in France (Paris). It''s gonna take place during 2006 autumn. You should take a look at http://paris.onrails.info/ Bye. -- Nicolas Cavigneaux http://www.bounga.org -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed...

Hi, I have a resource map like this: map.resources :users do |user| user.resource :sreg10record end So a User is supposed to have (at most) one Sreg10record. The problem is in the views. I tried following this tutorial: http://www.akitaonrails.com/2007/12/12/rolling-with-rails-2-0-the-first-full-tutorial which proposes something like: <% form_for( [@user, @sreg10record] ) do |f|

Hi everyone, We had a really successful meeting tonight in Atlanta. The topic was an introduction to Ruby on Rails and our attendance was 30 people, which is over double of what we normally get. (Our attendance has dropped since moving the venue about 25 miles north of the city. The majority of the group stayed well past two hours, at which point we took a break. The entire presentation and

Hello all I wrote a gist, which describes my problem: http://gist.github.com/300860 What param I need to pass to form_for? Thanks -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to

hi all: when using namespace or nested resources in routes.rb,such as "namespace :admin { resources :books }, we can use [:admin,@book] way to generate path. It works fine in form_for , but when I use it with respond_with in controller, I get problems. The problem is when I put following code in controller: def create @book=Book.find(params[:id])

My models: class Country < ActiveRecord::Base has_many :regions has_many :assets, :dependent => :destroy accepts_nested_attributes_for :assets end class Region < ActiveRecord::Base belongs_to :country has_many :appartments has_many :assets, :dependent => :destroy accepts_nested_attributes_for :assets end class Asset < ActiveRecord::Base belongs_to :region

Hi, Ruby-GetText-Package-1.1.0 is now available. This release enhances many features for Ruby on Rails. I hope this release make your Application support L10n. And thanks for many helps! Highlights ---------- * Added some functions which managed po/mo files easily. * GetText.update_pofiles creates/updates pot/po files. The idea is from Sascha Ebach. * String% is extended to accept

How many of you are using Rails: 1. As the primary development tool at your Day Job 2. As a small part of your Day Job 3. Not using Rails in your Day Job, but are using Ruby 4. For OS/outside work/hobby -- sam http://www.magpiebrain.com/

I fully suspect that I''m missing the point here somewhere so I promise I won''t be offended if you tell me I''m being daft. My application rents equipment ... not equipments. So I have the following: map.resources :equipment, :singular => :equipment_instance class Equipment < ActiveRecord::Base class EquipmentController < ApplicationController The

Hi everyone, I am relatively new to rspec and I am running into a wall in testing my views. I have a RESTful resource Contracts with a nested resource of Line_items. I am trying to figure out how to test the "edit" form of the Line_items. What complicates this is the nested routing and how to account for it, and that there is a partial form (_form.haml) that both the edit.haml and

Let''s say I have: map.resources :teams do |team| team.resources :squads, :shallow => true end When I want to generate a form_for a squad, I need both the team and squad for new/create, but only the squad for edit. This means I need: edit: form_for(squad) new: form_for([team, squad]) This seems not very dry. Is there a more idiomatic way of doing this? Right now,

I am looking for a good CMS based on Rails that has at least these attributes: 1. Ease of use ( as it will be used by people who are not html literate) 2. Very easy/flexible to change layout. So far I have looked at http://rcms.oopen.de/Home/ (have not installed it yet) http://adminpages.flowdev.de http://demo.radiantcms.org/admin/pages http://www.eribium.org/eribium/ MuraveyWeb does not seem

Hi I have an action which saves the originating resource from which it was called, and returns to it later. This is done by setting: session[:return_to] = request.referer ... redirect_to(session[:return_to]) Which works great for GET resources. The problem is that POST variables aren''t kept in request.referer, so this method fails when the originating resource is a a POST.