similar to: Connections direct to the gateway

Hi, I''m trying to share internet on a LAN I''ve a linux router with SQUID (with ZPH support) + FAIRNAT The idea is: - fairness sharing internet - priorize interactive traffic - if a web object is on squid-cache (HIT), user can download it, with a rate = LAN rate I''ve: - Last Fairnat Script: www.metamorpher.de/fairnat/ - SQUID 2.5STABLE5 with ZPH patch

Hi, I''m looking for a script in order to do traffic control on a ciber cafe LAN, with linux router. Ciber has about 40 hosts, and I haven''t much bandwidth (512kbit). Also, I''ve a squid cache and it works very good! I''ve found Jim QoS script, and FairNat. Which is more suitable for me ? Jim QoS ? FairNat ? other ? If I put FairNat, I would need ZPH patch

Jim diGriz''s QoS Script ? http://www.digriz.org.uk/jdg-qos-script/ FairNat ? http://www.metamorpher.de/fairnat/ other ?? bests andres _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

I''m moving to a new place and my new flatmate wants a router because he likes the cleaness of it all in a non geeky way which I can understand. This means it''s going to be hard for me to pursude him to let me run a computer as a router to act as bandwidth cop. But I don''t fancy trying to use ssh, VNC and games while he''s using WindowsUpdate or p2p. So I need

It seems Andreas Klauer''s fairnat has experimental support for using HTB''s MPU and overhead options. fairnat.config: # Use MPU for HTB. From the LARTC Howto on MPU: # "A zero-sized packet does not use zero bandwidth. For ethernet, no packet # uses less than 64 bytes. The Minimum Packet Unit determines the minimal # token usage for a packet." HTB_MPU=0 # HTB_MPU=64

Hi folks, i spent my whole day trying to set up my linux router using load balancing with multiple uplinks. I mainly focused on the nano howto, but somewhere I have a big mistake within my head. Basically the load-balancing is working, but not on a per-connection basis - just on a per packet basis. Practically this is not usable of course <g> But as far as I understood it should work..

Hi all I am a newbie to routing and I have a problem. I am trying to setup a Load Balanced router with the help of Advanced Routing and iproute2. I came across netsane script(http://muse.linuxmafia.org/netsane/) and Christopher Simon''s nano how to which told me some basic steps to do so. As i follwed these I ran into a few questions and problems. 1. Is it possible that I have no default

Hi, I think you now have 2 Links to the internet. You want to route web traffic (transparent proxy triffic) via one link and the rest via the other link. If it is the case, It is possible to do. I have done it. here I have mentioned eth0 and eth1 eth0 is connected to one link (link1) eth1 is connected to other link (link2) , via this link, web traffic will be routed. echo 210 link1 >>

Hi, I have a linux fileserver on my local network which (besides other things) serves as p2p machine. The network is connected to the internet through a hardware ADSL (512/256) router. What happens now is that my SSH and webtraffic (from other machines) becomes bogged down when loads of up- and downloads happen at the fileserver. As the fileserver does not do NAT for me, I can''t use

Greetings, I wanted to ask the list a question about dead gateway detection. I''ve followed the wonderful writeup by Christoph Simon on how to use Julians patch for dgd on two loadballanced connections, but I don''t want them loadballanced. How can I setup two default gateways but always have one be the preference unless it goes down. Once the dgd code sees that have it switch

hi, I have very annoying problem.. First a simple diagram : x.x.1.0/24 -----------------| x.x.2.0/24 -----------------|---- (gw: eth0: x.x.1.1 eth1: x.x.2.1 eth1: x.x.3.1) ----> x.x.3.0/24 -----------------| now I have two machines x.x.3.10 (2.4 kernel) and x.x.3.11(2.6 kernel) AND they are in the same LAN (phisical net) but as u see in different IP (logical nets). As I look the traffic

I am trying to figure out how to create a PnP Gateway. What I understand it does is this. My server Ip: 192.168.100.1 Dhcp range 192.168.100.xxx/24 Sub 255.255.255.0 Gateway 192.168.100.1 What I am looing to do from what I understand is allow someone with a static ip of say like 1.1.1.1/24 and a gateway of 1.1.1..254 to connect to the network and access the network. Can someone point me where

Hi, I am the network administrator of my company, I know quite well Windows networking and a few about Linux and its amazing routing and QOS capabilities. Right now, we have a bustable T1, which mean that the bill increase with out T1 use. I have decided to find a way to shape the traffic so I can stay at a raisonable speed of 256 kb/s (Up/down) on my T1. I have linux gateway with 2 nics behind a

Hi, I''ve setup a gateway using multiple default gateways and netfilter MASQUERADE to load balance traffic between two DSL interfaces and one dedicated link, and when I try to download something big, or when I''m using MSN (both in clients under this gateway), sometimes, or most times, after a while the connection timeouts. The connection doesn''t seem to change its

Hi is it any tool like show.pl by Stef Coene to generate graph with classes but for HTB regards emil _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

Hi, I think I found a problem in iproute or ubuntu kernel. I think that the "ip route get" returns wrong interface and gateway in an multipath routing environment on Ubuntu 6.06 LTS. I reported it also to launchpad as a bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/iproute/+bug/105521 The easiest way to reproduce it is to start an Ubuntu 6.06 LTS Live on a system with three

Hi, I have made this script, that I use for controlling the bandwidth on a gateway for about 100 computers. It is working quite effectively to limit the use of p2p programs (and other programs), so that you can surf undisturbed. Also, it improves internet access in general, so that one large download doesn''t take up all your bandwidth. I was wondering if someone would like to test it,

Hi, I''m trying to use prio qdisc with htb, however not the "usual" way (like for example FairNAT). Here is my idea: Root has HTB shaping traffic to link speed -> then goes PRIO queues -> each prio queue has HTB with sublasses for each user, should look like this: 1: htb qdisc | 1:1 htb class

Hi, I have a linux box with two dsl modems on it (connection is done via pppoe), I''m trying to route default traffic on the primary connection (ppp0) and mail traffic on another one (ppp1). This traffic will come from the localhost. I run Slackware 9.1 (Kernel 2.4.22), recompiled with necessary options for using iproute2. According to the advanced routing howto, I did the following

Hello.. Is there a way to reset or block connections with linux which is connected on same eth.hub with wireless acc.point (spanned host)? If I turn to promisc mode I can see whole traffic on network . I have p2p monitor running on linux and monitoring wireles AP which give my source an dest address and source an dest port information. So I need block this problematic connection. Linux computer