similar to: administrative distance ?????

Thank you Bert, and Wichert. I know I can put my iproute2 commands in /etc/rc.local. Is there any other place I can save my commands? I just want know so I do not have to retype all of the command on reboot. Thx again Mike Tedesco _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc

Hello, Here is my network: ------------------ ------------- ----------- Linux box ----------- GRE --------- Cisco ---------- ------------------ ------------- What I wan to accomplish. I want ripv2 to go across (both ways) through the GRE tunnel. No packets are being passed thought the GRE

Hi, my name is Grant Taylor. I am a subscriber to the LARTC mail list lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl. The LARTC mail lists has been plagued with viral email coming from changing IPs in your one of your subnets. Based on the fact that the WhoIs information below says that the subnet in question is a dial up pool this would explain the changing IPs. In less than 6 days the list has received 14 viral

Hello List, I configured a GRE tunnel between a Linux server & Cisco. I would like to save the commands somewhere so that next time the machine boots up the tunnel will be formed automatically. One way is to put the commands in rc.local file. But I want to know if there is a way to save these commands through the IP route 2 utility. Doesn''t ip route 2 utility offer a way to save the

* sorry for the 2 previous schemas, they came out a mess. I hope this one is understandable. hi: I have this 2 boxes set up like this: 2020::2/128 2020::254/128 3030::254/128 192.168.0.2/24 192.168.0.254/24 192.168.30.254/24 +-------+ eth0 eth3 +-------+ | |==================== | | eth1 | A | | B | ---- | |

> Message: 1 > Date: Fri, 06 Oct 2006 00:06:08 -0400 > From: Kevin White <kwhite@telsource.com> > Subject: [LARTC] Two upstream gateways, only use one unless it fails? > To: lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl > Message-ID: <4525D630.1040401@telsource.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed > > I''m looking at setting up a system with

Working at setting up some new firewalls with multi-path routing over 2 isps. Doing it with debian sarge. Problem is the normal network scripts use ifconfig and route. In my tests I did a simple setup script. Feel like I am reinventing the wheel :-) Is it OK to use the network scripts to setup the interface and then remove the routes ifconfig created and add any needed routes with ip

Hi Nitin, First of all, you can verify that ntpd is responding on ingress with netcat : nc -u ingress 123 (udp connection on port 123) also try a netstat -an on ingress to be sure that the port 123 is in listen state... I recently install ntpdate, and it has worked as a client and a local ntp server immediatly. Good Luck, Yannick / Annecy in France -----Message d''origine----- De :

Здравствуйте lartc-request, Friday, October 03, 2003, 8:44:37 AM, you wrote: lrmdn> Send LARTC mailing list submissions to lrmdn> lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl lrmdn> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit lrmdn> http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc lrmdn> or, via email, send a message with subject or body ''help'' to lrmdn>

I am using kernel 2.6.9 (gentoo,AMD64 version) + routes-2.6.9-11.diff If compile kernel with gcc 3.4.3, then the similar error comes out: ------------------ net/ipv4/fib_frontend.c: In function `fib_validate_source'': include/net/ip_fib.h:181: sorry, unimplemented: inlining failed in call to ''fib_result_table'': function body not available net/ipv4/fib_frontend.c:204:

Hi everybody, Sometime last week outpost.ds9a.nl''s disk filled up and mailman corrupted one of its databases. It took quite some time to fix this, for which I apologize. But we''re back now! For posterity, the log file reported: Nov 13 13:27:33 2004 (25374) Delivery exception: EOF read where object expected Nov 13 13:27:33 2004 (25374) Traceback (most recent call last): File

hello! i have the following problem: i have a pc, which has one (eth0) NIC. eth0 is connected to two other linux machines acting as routers to the internet. i want to classify packets outgoing from my PC. i want to mark packets that are routed through 1. router with mark 1 and the others packets routed throuhg router 2. with mark 2. i had following ideas: -using destination MAC -using route

Hello all, I do not read C very well (especially kernel C). Though I have tried to muddle my way through an understanding of what''s going on in fib_hash.c, fib_rules.c, and route.c, I have not succeeded to my satisfaction, hence my post. I''m trying to document the general process of route selection, and have come up with the following overview. Could somebody point out any

Hello, I am attempting to implement load balancing on a firewall to allow me to use two ISPs. I have followed the instructions in section 4.2 of the LARTC HOWTO but have got stuck on the split access section I have the options CONFIG_IP_ADVANCED_ROUTER and CONFIG_IP_MULTIPLE_TABLES in my kernel (2.4.24) and have added routes to the /etc/iproute2/rt_tables file but when I try a command in the

I''m attempting to perform some class based routing using Linux in combination with quagga/zebra. My current experience is with FreeBSD/ipfw/quagga. I''ve read most of the LARTC documentation as well Martin Brown''s Guide to IP Layer Network Admin. Here''s the basics of my set up: |- R1 <-> ISP1 R0-| |- R2 <-> ISP2 | |- R3

Hi all, i''m new at LARTC, and after reading the docs I found no solution to my problem ... On one side I have eth0 conected to the LAN, on the other side I have eth1 conected to a switch and to 3 DSL routers with 3 diferent providers, and also eth2 conected to a cisco 2600 conected to a LDMS line. I have readed the larct docs about multihomed conections to internet, but I''m

I have a fairly simply laid out network that could easily use static routing. However, I plan to expand quickly and don''t wish to spend the better part of my life maintaining static routes. INTERNET | --------- Gateway | - LAN 172.16.1.x | - LINK 192.168.1.1 --------- |<----wifi --------- router 2 | -LAN 172.16.2.x | -Link 192.168.1.2 ---------

Hello, i read an old message of Ard van Breemen with subject "More things about /proc / failover of default gateway" (http://mailman.ds9a.nl/pipermail/lartc/2002q1/002667.html) and tryed to do the same config. But then i''m inserting the second default route ip tells: root@epia# ip route add default via 192.168.1.1 RTNETLINK answers: File exists As i know, there are no way to

Greetings, I''m trying to set up some sort of load-balancing on a Linux (Trustix) gateway by using multipath routes, however I''m stuck with some problems. The idea is that this gateway (odd as it may seem) only has one external interface, which should route packets to two different gateways (Ciscos). The gateway''s external interface and the routers are all on the same

Hi, I''ve been experimenting with ip route for the last few days to get load sharing accross 2 providers working. While it works most of the time, on a few occasions, packets are routed to the wrong interface. I''m not sure to understand rules and routes traversal correctly (I couldn''t find answers in the howto). So, here are my questions: 1. How does the rule