similar to: HTB and HTTP latency

Hi. I was asked to put a real IP behind a linux router is doing static NAT for an internal network. Internet (gateway) | | | eth0 = real IP ----------------- L I N U X ROUTER ----------------- eth1 = private IP | | | eth0 = real IP ----------------- Wireless Access Point -----------------

Been running this for quite a while and noticed that have intermittent problems getting out. Find that if I ping the same site from 2 computers it may work on one and fail on the other. Also was surprised that some time they are going out different interfaces at the same time. Seems to work all the time from the firewall. Running 2.6.10 kernel with the multipath routing patches on a debian

Hi, I configured a router box to use 2 providers, as described in the HOWTO. (Apendix 1) I want to use both links to reach a single smtp server. As I read in the kptd and in some old messages of this list, doing a SNAT in the postrouting chain comes _after_ the routing desision. So I guess the following lines I''m trying to use are wrong. (See Apendix 1) What can I do to have multiple

Hi :-) I'm new to R and I started using it for a project (I'm the CS guy in a group of statisticians helping them find out how to solve issues as they come out). This is my first post to the list and I am starting to learn R. Well, they were used to doing MCA analysis in other programs where the data seems to be preprocessed automatically before running MCA. So, they need to process a

Hi. Contents: 1) Introduction 2) 2 Questions * Introduction: I used this HOWTO to use multiple providers. http://lartc.org/howto/lartc.rpdb.multiple-links.html The box is a load balancer, using the Linux Virtual Server. We have a problem with lost connections, and it seems you get issues when you combine this setup with DNAT [1]. The proposed solution [1] is to use these rules to mark

Hi! I''m doing load balancing for 5 dsl lines, each one with a dsl router attached to a linux machine ethernet plug. The problem is that I''m adding 15 more dsl lines, and I don''t have enough PCI slots in the linux machine to sum up 20 ethernet plugs (I already have 2 quad ethernet cards). So I''m considering connecting all dsl routers and the linux machine to a

Hi, I have three linux machines, and I want to let one of them forward packets betwen the other two. The forwarding node has two ethernet cards, connecting the two two machines respectively. However, when I ping between the two end points, the forwarding node can receive the ping requests at its eth0, but it never forwards them to its eth1. So is the reverse direction. The forwarding node is

Hi list, playing around with HTB showed that it may introduces pretty much latency for our setup. Docum.org says the following: "The default qdisc added to a htb class is pfifo_fast qdisc. The size of the qdisc is the device queue length and this is 100 packets for an ethernet device. So if you want to have a shorter queue, you have to add a shorter qdisc to the htb qdisc." Can

Hi I''m actually using a wondershaper derived script. The problem I have is that when I ping (ping is in high priority queue) the ping time is not as low as I expected with p2p running: 760 packets transmitted, 760 received, 0% packet loss, time 759695ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 39.667/62.863/598.539/33.287 ms, pipe 2 With voip, it is much better with the qos but it is still a little

Hi! I have configured traffic shaping with htb and imq but when i am downloading the latency for example on the Bnet class is very high ..... example: 65 kb/s download best latency: 56ms lateny on bnet class while downloading: 400 350 250 350 400 100 300 200 80 200 300 250 ..... To get informations about latency i am marking ping packets with iptables. I want to play during other users

Hola: Desde hace varias versiones no puedo utilizar la ayuda HTML de R. Cuando, por ejemplo, lanzo ?nlm me abre el navegador con ERROR The requested URL could not be retrieved While trying to retrieve the URL: http://127.0.0.1:28683/library/stats/html/nlm.html The following error was encountered: Connection to 127.0.0.1 Failed The system returned: (111) Connection refused The remote host

Hello, I''m using these rules (attached) to control traffic going out from ip 192.168.0.100 which is acting as a p2p server, but when I have these rules on and mldonkey running I experience some latency in web pages, which Iwould like to eliminate. I''ve read that this is where the burst and cburst (even quantum) parameters are useful, but I still can''t understand

Estimado Mauricio Monsalvo Le paso una idea, no es un código muy lindo que digamos, pero al correrlo seguramente se dará cuenta de mi sugerencia. datos<-c(2,3,4,5,6,7,8) quantile(datos) quantile(datos,probs = c(0.25, 0.75, 0.85, 0.90, 0.95)) as.matrix(quantile(datos,probs = c(0.25, 0.75, 0.85, 0.90, 0.95))) as.data.frame(quantile(datos,probs = c(0.25, 0.75, 0.85, 0.90, 0.95))) # ¿ y si solo

Hola Leonardo. Creo que te refieres a analizar alguna variable por grupos. Eso te lo pueden hacer las funciones tipo tapply(). Por ejemplo, tapply(datos,factor,mean, na.rm=TRUE) tapply(datos,factor,sd, na.rm=TRUE) tapply(datos,factor,quantile,probs=c(0.05,0.95),na.rm=TRUE) En cuanto a RCommander, que lo preguntabas después, algunas opciones del menú tienen la opción "Analizar por

Habría que buscar la vuelta, yo no lo se, pero posiblemente lo siguiente da una pista. Nota: al mismo código le sume una línea al final datos<-c(2,3,4,5,6,7,8) quantile(datos) quantile(datos,probs = c(0.25, 0.75, 0.85, 0.90, 0.95)) as.matrix(quantile(datos,probs = c(0.25, 0.75, 0.85, 0.90, 0.95))) as.data.frame(quantile(datos,probs = c(0.25, 0.75, 0.85, 0.90, 0.95))) # ¿ y si solo solicita

Hi. I am trying to shape my upstream bandwidth, mostly per port. and I am having some problems getting things to work the way I want them to. before I throw my configuration at you guys ;), I`d like to debug it by myself - but I was not able to find a tool that allow me to monitor current bandwidth usage per port (and preferably even per port+ip). I want to know what is the current bandwidth

Hi all!! I'd set up my samba 2.2.7 to auth with "security=domain" mode, but my clients cannot auth successfully never because the samba server cannot "talk" correctly with my PDC(w2k adv. Server). In the computer manager event, I see authentication request but with empty usernames......so the PDC reject the authentication request. Is this a know

Hi all :) I''m new to this list, as I''m new too to traffic shaping ;) I''ve set up an FTP server in my ADSL line and I wanted it to serve as fast as possible as long as I don''t use my outgoing ADSL bandwidth, and I''m currently using HTB for that (succesfully, I must add). The problem is (when the FTP server is serving higher than its

If you tell me how to update R itself automatically, I will go for your advice. I am not aware of any method to do it... Bye Rick "ONKELINX, Thierry"

Hello, I''am successful using a linux (2.4.20) bridge and the cbq.init_v0.7 script for traffic shaping. But I can only use the queuing discipline tbf (LEAF=tbf). If I try use queuing discipline sfq or none then tc applies the rules but no shaping occurs. Is this problem a normal behavior when using bridging ? I tried to use htb.init (using patched tc binary). It accepts the rules but