similar to: WFQ-implementation in Linux

Hi all As part of may project i wants to implement the WFQ in linux, at present upto my knowledge there is no such implementation in linux. The only mannual i got from "Csaba Toth", He explained the tc command so i hope that is in linux also. DID any one know about it, Please infome me about it also, Thanks for all regards ********* *Sunil* *********

> From: "CIT/Paul" <xerox@foonet.net> > Any help would be greatly appreciated :) This is much better than SFQ :> Sounds like SFQ to me. Can you tell us what the differences are?

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I was searching for few days in this mailing list but I didn''t find how to solve my tc problem. Feel free to ask me more details if you think there are relevant. I''m using a Gentoo 2.4.32-gentoo-r2 and I''m trying to test a *weighted fair queuing* (WFQ) implementation. See http://home.sch.bme.hu/~tusi/wfq/ I patched

I would like to implement an architecture to support LLQ and WFQ with Qos linux elements ! Is possible use CBQ (you can set same parameters to control WRR process) or HTB (how can i controll DRR process) structure ? My idea is to classify packets by List flows, tos flows or connections flows (as CBWFQ on CISCO ) I saw also for WRR patch (http://www.zz9.dk/wrr), but I don''t understand

Hi all, I need to provide shell hosting for about 40 users, and few days ago I found the wondershaper script, so Im trying to know if this script could help me to improve interactive ssh/telnet connections. Wondershaper could help me or its only efective on OUTGOINGS requests? Ok, any comment and feedback will be welcome. Sorry for my bad english and THANKS in advance.

Hello, I''m looking how (if) can I solve the following problem using HTB and iproute2: I need to assing the same bandwidth limit to every client, but the problem is that clients will be random - i.e. I know niether number of clients no IP or MAC addresses. If anybody knows FreeBSD''s ipfw2 - I''m looking for something like "ipfw pipe 150 config mask dst-ip 0xffffffff

Hi, How can I set equal bandwidth of 512kbit downlink and 256kbit uplink for every single IP address of 254 IP addresses I have in my LAN? Regards, ro0ot

Hello, Normally, in addition to such qdisc scheduler mechanisms as FIFO, PQ, WRR, WFQ, are there any more? Then, there is a confusion on scheduler in Linux enviroment: Assume there is a qdisc, such as RED as a leaf qdisc in a router, we know, if there is packet which want to enqueue the packet, the Function red_enqueue is called, but when the packet leave the queue(when the Function red_dequeue

hai all i need to implement CBWFQ in linux As i wrote script in edge as: which mark the EF traffic ____________________________________________________________________-__ #!/bin/sh DEV=eth0 tc qdisc add dev $DEV handle 1: root dsmark indices 8 tc class change dev $DEV classid 1:1 dsmark mask 0x3 value 0xb8 # making two filters tc filter add dev $DEV parent 1:0 prio 4 protocol ip u32 tc

i''am new here and i saw some tutorials but those was old for the 2.4.xkernel and i don''t know were to start correctly. many thanks to all of you. sincerly: Timi _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc

Hi, I wanted to implemente WFQ, but it is not implemented on tc. Is there any way of making something like WFQ with which is implemented on tc?? What I exactly want to do, is to select flows by IP and port destination, and priorize them, but I don''t need (and don''t really want) to fix any rate... Has anyone got any clue??? Thank you Bye

Hi, I used HTB3.6 on Linux to control traffic.It seems that HTB uses DRR(Dificit Round-Robin) algorithm.I heard that it is difficult for DRR to get a delay bounded and WFQ is better than DRR.Is that right?So,how to implement WFQ in Linux? Thanks a lot! Best Regards swcims swcims@163.com 2004-08-03 _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list

Dear members, I am trying to share the bandwith for all users fairly. because some users heavily uses p2p programs and a few hosts consume most of bandwith. when we limit each flow it does not work as one client has many connection at same time. Firstly I tried to write a script that use the ipfm(which accounts traffic usage) logs as follow .extract ip addresses heavy bandwith users from

Hi, I want to see bandwidth every ip address in the local network that passing my linux gateway in the console, may be it''s similar like mrtg (web based version) It''s possible ? Best regards, >--<Kristiadi Himawan>--<

Hi everybody. I have a dilema and I think you guys can help me out. I am trying to shape the bandwith for about 500 clients, and I want the bandwith to be alocated dynamicly. Lets say I have 4 MB bandwith. I give each ip (500 IP''s) a sustained rate of 4 KB/sec . I wonder if I can shape the bandwith so when for example only 100 clients are online, to give them a rate of 4MB/100. How can

I am working on traffic shaping using the nextenso proxy platform(a product of alcatel)on linux platform, I wish to do dynamic traffic shaping means on a fly, is that possible with TCNG?? With Warm Regards, Aruna Baghel "Gratitude can transform common days into thanksgivings, turn routine jobs into joy, and change ordinary opportunities into blessings."

How can we have WFQ implemented in Linux.....any pointers. Also do we need a patch in Kernel to implement these. Regards Arshad

Hi, at my local university network, I have to make sure no student uploads more than x GB/day. So far, I give them unlimited bandwidth until they have more than y GB (y<x) upload. After that, I use the u32 filter to associate the affected IP address with a HTB class limited to the rate (remainingtraffic/remainingtime). Since the accounting is done with ipt_ACCOUNT right now and the netfilter

Hi folks, So, I have a pretty simple setup - a linux router machine running as a firewall/router for a small neighborhood LAN (approx 20 machines). I also have squid running on the box in non-transparent mode, and also I have set up NAT for TCP/UDP ports above 1024 for all clients and SSH/POP/SMTP/CVS NAT''d for selected ones based on MAC filtering. No hosts whatsoever can access ports 80

I''ve the same problem of Julien Bisconti. Can someone help me ? I try to compile iproute2 for my target ppc 8260. Thank you !