similar to: problem in speeds [Message from superlinux]

hi all. here in Lebanon,Beriut we are allowed only to use satellite for downlink only. uplink is made through a router connected to public land lines. The satellite card is a penta card. i want to distribute Internet connection to customers. such a connection i want to do on linux. but what hinders me is the configuration which i dont know how to do. so please , some one tell me how to

+superlinux on YouTube posted a detailed walk-through of setting up NUT on Debian: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cn3DQ0ns9aQ Source: https://github.com/networkupstools/nut/issues/241 -- Charles Lepple clepple at gmail

Hello, I can't connect to a dovecot server (Debian 6.0, default version of Dovecot), I started the daemon but I didn't see errors on console. dovecot-lda works. logs: 2012-12-14 12:47:10 deliver(bernics.gabor at penta.hu): Info: Loading modules from directory: /usr/lib/dovecot/modules/lda 2012-12-14 12:47:10 deliver(bernics.gabor at penta.hu): Info: Module loaded:

I have the following situation: A Linux 2.4.22 server: Physical ethernet: lan1 - Ethernet port (Internet) lan2 - Ethernet port (Cisco Switch, Trunk port) Tunnel: tap1 - OpenVPN in tcp-server mode VLAN's: lan2.201 lan2.202 lan2.203 tap1.201 tap1.202 tap1.203 Bridges: br201 (lan2.201, tap1.201) br202 (lan2.202, tap1.202) br203 (lan2.203, tap1.203) On the other end, the same type of server:

I would like to route ssh in my network via DSL2 and all other trafic via DSL1. So far I menaged to do it for LAN2 but there are still WLAN1,LAN3 and LAN1 to go. On all routers I added table "pilicka" with rule for fwmark and I fwmarked ssh. # ip rule show 0: from all lookup local 32765: from all fwmark 0x3 lookup pilicka 32766: from all lookup main 32767: from all lookup

Hello all, I have browsed archives and real all available HOWTOs, but I still have a few doubts. My set up is a router, as below. LAN(100MB)-------------(eth1)Linux-Router(eth0)---------------WAN(2MB/512) My aim is to cotrol both uplink and downlink bandwidth. For uplink control, I will use HTB on WAN interface. For downlink, I plan to attach HTB on LAN interface(both egress/outgoing). No

Hi, On one of our asterisk systems that is quite busy, we are seeing the following from 'netstat -s': Udp: 17725210 packets received 36547 packets to unknown port received. 44017 packet receive errors 17101174 packets sent RcvbufErrors: 44017 <--- this When this number increases, we see SIP errors, and in particular Qualify packets are lost, and

Hi, We are running on 5.5 on a HP ProLiant DL360 G6. Kernel version is 2.6.18-194.17.1.el5 (we had also tested with the latest available kernel kernel-2.6.18-238.1.1.el5.x86_64) We running some performance tests using the "iperf" utility. We are seeing very bad and inconsistent performance on the UDP testing. The maximum we could get, was 440 Mbits/sec, and it varies from 250 to 440

Hi, I have a question about policy filters. All I want is incoming traffic being restricted to a specific rate. At the moment, I get way lower rates than specified. So far, I did use a filter much like Wondershaper does: tc filter add dev $DEV parent ffff: protocol ip prio 50 \ u32 match ip src 0.0.0.0/0 \ police rate ${DOWNLINK}kbit burst 10k drop flowid :1

Dear R gurus, I have the following code, but I still not know how to estimate and extract confidence intervals (95%CI) from resampling. Thanks! ~Adriana #data penta<-c(770,729,640,486,450,410,400,340,306,283,278,260,253,242,240,229,201,198,190,186,180,170,168,151,150,148,147,125,117,110,107,104,85,83,80,74,70,66,54,46,45,43,40,38,10) x<-log(penta+1) plot(ecdf(x),

We can only process 1 packet at one time during sendmsg(). This often lead bad cache utilization under heavy load. So this patch tries to do some batching during rx before submitting them to host network stack. This is done through accepting MSG_MORE as a hint from sendmsg() caller, if it was set, batch the packet temporarily in a linked list and submit them all once MSG_MORE were cleared. Tests

I am currently using the ultimate-tc script from http://lartc.org/howto/lartc.cookbook.ultimate-tc.html and I want to make sure that internet radio packets (mp3 streaming audio) will always get through no matter what. I have added some iptables commands like this: iptables -A OUTPUT -t mangle -p tcp --dport 8000 -j TOS --set-tos Minimize-Delay iptables -A OUTPUT -t mangle -p tcp --sport 8000 -j

We can only process 1 packet at one time during sendmsg(). This often lead bad cache utilization under heavy load. So this patch tries to do some batching during rx before submitting them to host network stack. This is done through accepting MSG_MORE as a hint from sendmsg() caller, if it was set, batch the packet temporarily in a linked list and submit them all once MSG_MORE were cleared. Tests

CALL FOR PAPERS / PARTICIPATION At FOSDEM 2014, LLVM will for the first time participate with a dedicated devroom. Complementing the upcoming Euro LLVM 2014, the devroom at FOSDEM provides a great opportunity for core LLVM developers and the wider open source community to get together, connect and discuss. As possibly the largest European Open Source Conference, FOSDEM takes place in Brussels

hey guys i am regulating the traffic to & fro by my network through a linux gateway , its behaving strange. i regulated Downlink to 2Mbps & UPlLINK to 500Kbps. both perform well when those are done independent i.e. one at a time but when i do both from a client system ..the downlink however continues at 2mbps but the uplink falls down to 100kbps? is something wrong with my script or

Hello all, I am providing broadband service through DVB circuit. I have 4KB uplink and 32KB downlink. I want to share 32KB downlink bandwidth among 192.168.0.0/24 (20 users in this subnet i.e 192.168.0.2-192.168.0.22)subnet where each user will get 2KB to 6KB bandwidth. And from 4KB uplink bandwidth each users will get only 1KB to 2KB bandwidth.

CALL FOR PAPERS / PARTICIPATION Submission deadline: December 1st At FOSDEM 2014, LLVM will for the first time participate with a dedicated devroom. Complementing the upcoming Euro LLVM 2014, the devroom at FOSDEM provides a great opportunity for core LLVM developers and the wider open source community to get together, connect and discuss. As possibly the largest European Open Source

I have been testing wondershaper 1.1a with htb. DOWNLINK=2304 UPLINK=1024 DEV=wlan0 No other changes have been made, except to comment out the 2 lines to allow the script to run. When I do a speed test from sites like www.toast.net/performance, I only get speeds equal to my UPLINK speed. I expected a speed closer to the DOWNLINK. Am I missing something here? TIA, -- -Wes Hegge Technical

We can only process 1 packet at one time during sendmsg(). This often lead bad cache utilization under heavy load. So this patch tries to do some batching during rx before submitting them to host network stack. This is done through accepting MSG_MORE as a hint from sendmsg() caller, if it was set, batch the packet temporarily in a linked list and submit them all once MSG_MORE were cleared. Tests

We can only process 1 packet at one time during sendmsg(). This often lead bad cache utilization under heavy load. So this patch tries to do some batching during rx before submitting them to host network stack. This is done through accepting MSG_MORE as a hint from sendmsg() caller, if it was set, batch the packet temporarily in a linked list and submit them all once MSG_MORE were cleared. Tests