similar to: [Fwd: Re: TC/HTB Graphs]

Bogdan Coman wrote: > hareram wrote: > >> Hi >> >> iam looking to graph the tc classes and qdisc >> iam trying to access the stef scripts >> but its site is totally broken >> >> could some one point me where i can graph using good docs >> >> hare >> >> _______________________________________________ >> LARTC mailing

Hi iam looking to graph the tc classes and qdisc iam trying to access the stef scripts but its site is totally broken could some one point me where i can graph using good docs hare

Hi all Its been long time i have sending this message to this news group but i could not get proper responce from the authors or any experts that, is that bug or only the problem with my ssytem iam tryin this config with FC iptable 1.3.0 and latest TC tc utility, iproute2-ss050330 htb 3.17 iam trying past 2 weeks and digging all googles but could not able to come to conclusion whats wrong

Hi all and tc Gururs i have patched the IMQ and htb to kernel, but when i do egress filtering, iam not able to see any traffic and excusted the following the commands modprobe imq numdevs=1 tc qdisc add dev imq0 handle 1: root htb default 1 tc class add dev imq0 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 100kbit tc qdisc add dev imq0 parent 1:1 handle 10: htb default 1 tc class add dev imq0 parent

Hi all iam trying to deploy loadbalance and failover My setup description --Fedora Core 4 --Linux 2.6.12.3 #1 SMP Mon Jul 25 22:37:34 IST 2005 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux --tc utility, iproute2-ss050314 --ip utility, iproute2-ss050314 --iptables v1.3.0 And i had deployed Following configuration #table main with priority 50, the highest one ip rule add prio 50 table main #table 201 ip rule add

Hi all i have installed the FEDORA and i saw the fedora ships with latest IP and TC and HTB too when i add the with TC Script with HTB iam getting that HTB version. HTB init, kernel part version 3.12 and iam comparing with my old version which is installed and patched with TC 3.6 patch that is on RH 9.0 with TC and HTB patch shows HTB init, kernel part version 3.7 so which one is latest ,

Hi all iam trying to setup Dual gate using Julian patch DGD, but when i try tp patch to my kernel with fedora iam getting the following eroor can some one suggest me what is wrong or i need a latest patch for fedora [root@linux-2.4.22-1.2115.nptl]# patch -p1 < /root/update/update/routes-2.4.20-9.diff patching file include/linux/netfilter_ipv4/ip_nat.h patching file

Hi all Iam planning to deploy new QOS system in my organization or small ISP I would like to achieve the following scenario 1. Many of the customers are connected to My ISP At this moment all the users are restricted either local or international traffic QOS is same. now i want to deploy all users which are travelling local services and other customers connected to my ISP

Hi all iam trying to migrate from my QOS Services from RH 9.0 to Fedora i saw that fedora shipping with latest TC with HTB patch Does any one see any problem with this version some expert coment will be apprciate hare _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

Hi iam running FEDORA, i have installed Source of iptable 1.2.9 with the patch layer7-iptables patch done with out any errors and i applied patch in kernel to the layer 7 patch and i have select the required option by doing make menyconfig done make dep make bzImage make modules make modules_install make install and rebooted with customer kernel when i type iptables -t mangle -A

Hi I have tested with FC3 but iam not able get any good results on that. in the list some one recomend me that > 3.17 HTB should work I saw latest FC4 test2 has the HTB 3.17 with iptables 1.3.0 i have install in my P4 box, and trying to test when iam uploading its working perfect, but when iam downloading its going to default class can some one experinced the same problem below is the my

Hi all Iam planning to deploy Multiple Links using RH 9.0/ PIII 500Mhz/512MB RAM With all Patches related to Route and rest Mentioned in nano.txt Iam Running BGP 4 with all the ISP, but iam not doing Load balancing the Links Each Link have specific application and specific users. Eth0 is connected to Local Net eth1- ISP1 eth2- ISP2 eth3- ISP3 Now i want to make Specific Routes x.x.x.x

Hi all I was refered in archive of the List i did not found right answer for my setup so iam trying to find does any one deployed the setup iam looking iam trying to Build network ring using Linux Box I have 3 office connected with Fiber setup looks like below Eth0--(server1)-Eth1-------Fiber--------Eth0--(Server2)---Eth1-----Fiber----Eth0--(Server3)--eth1 | |

Hi all Iam running FC1 with htb and tc, with iptables my setup with vlan trunking with linux box, and using cisco switch with fc1 iam able to run this config with b/w control well now i have upgraded to fc2 and tried fc3 also with out any b/w restrictions iam able to browse the sites very smoothly and able to access all the sites with out any problem when i introduce the Qos rule with 1 PC

Hi Couple months ago I started to have a strange problem with HTB. My setup is Fedora Core 2 + Pentium 2 233 + 128 MB of ram and its serving as a router. For some time since going to kernel 2.6 my HTB QoS Stalls for couple seconds, every couple minutes. If the connection load is bigger the stalling is more frequent and takes longer. I isolated the problem to be with HTB (CBQ works fine). The

Hi all i was going through the documents i need to achive the following setup, but iam confused to deploy but some one recomed me what will be good ------------------------ offic ------------------------ other office ----- Switch ----lan users ___________________ --- fiber link ___ wireless link now i want fiber both the links to be load balance from other office to this

dear all iam newbie , i have 256 kbits of down link and 64 kbits of up link iam using squid and htb i have got this while browsing the net , there are some few issues i need help while running the script i want browsing to be as fast as possible , uplink especially kaaza should not eat my band width. eth1 got public ip address and eth0 is internal with network 10.0.0.0/24 iam also using nat

I wan to share internet to these 12 PCs. But my traffic control is not working. I''m using IP Masquerading to route internet to the LAN eth0 - LAN interface eth1 - Internet interface this is my firs htb script: #!/bin/bash tc qdisc del dev eth1 root handle 1: tc qdisc add dev eth1 root handle 1: htb default 30 tc class add dev eth1 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 25kbps ceil 48kbps #tc

Hi all iam using Iptables+TC+HTB on Redhat 9 working fine with the bandwidth control I am taging my eth1 with Vlan interface with Cisco Switch when even though i have mention ceil, its crossing more than Ceil, when they are effected Virus in their network or DoS attacks, its should be control the mentioned Ceil right, why this uploads are increaing.. when the uploads are increased all the

I forward this to the list also, I attached SFQ leaf to parent class, and add QUANTUM value and PERTURB value. It worked! i tried 20hosts borrowing from the same parent, no problem. Each host get its own allocated bandwidth. Btw about last email sent to this list asking about QoS, i ve read LARTC document but i cant find the solution matches my case. Need help.. I have 100Kbit allocated to