similar to: 26sec kame ipsec tunnel : packets leave unencrypted...

Hello, I''m trying to put 3 nodes in a vpn in tunnel mode. When I run setkey on the following file, I end up with The result of line 33: File exists. That error isn''t overly helpful, so I was hoping that someone could explain the issue. Here''s the file, with line 33 highlighted. Help appreciated. Mike # Flush the SAD and SPD flush; spdflush; # Add SA for

class wrote on 06/10/2004 11:18:48: > Hello, I have the following situation: > > 192.168.176.0/24 ------ A ========== B ------ 192.168.177.0/24 > 192.168.176.2 pop3 ipsec > racoon > > > policy: (Machine A and B) > ------- > loc vpn ACCEPT > vpn loc ACCEPT > all

class wrote on 06/10/2004 11:18:48: > Hello, I have the following situation: > > 192.168.176.0/24 ------ A ========== B ------ 192.168.177.0/24 > 192.168.176.2 pop3 ipsec > racoon > > > policy: (Machine A and B) > ------- > loc vpn ACCEPT > vpn loc ACCEPT > all

Hi, When a IPSec tunnel is established between two peers, I understand that the "normal" situation is to have in a given moment two SAs, one for each direction of the tunnel. However, in one of my tunnels (peer P1 running GNU/Linux with setkey and racoon; peer P2 is a Cisco router) there is a large number (around 19) of SAs established (this has been observed in P1 with

Hi, Thanks to some pointers from Christian Kratzer, I am now able to join the office VPN from a random WiFi hotspot. With the configuration files changes detailed below, from a public WiFi hotspot I can now use this 3 step procedure to login to the office VPN. 1) While at hotspot, boot up my -STABLE laptop. 2) Insert wireless card. 3) "rsh server" This procedure works for a DHCP

Dear list, I''m running Shorewall on a dedicated Fedora 7 box. Shorewall is working well as an office DSL router (dynamic IP) with loc and dmz zones. I am now trying to configure IPSec to connect a VPS, "casp", with a static IP to both the firewall and to the loc network behind it. The host to host SA works fine. However, pings from "loc" to "casp" can be

> -----Original Message----- > From: Greg Panula [mailto:greg.panula@dolaninformation.com] > Sent: 12 May 2003 11:10 > To: Matthew Braithwaite > Cc: stable@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: iHEADS UP: ipsec packet filtering change > > You don't really need the gif tunnels for ipsec. Gif is more geared > towards ipv4 <=> ipv6 type tunnels. A few of ipsec

Hi everyone, I wrote up a post on the FreeBSD forums about the issue I am having. It's rather long so I am providing a link to it here: http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?t=39595 In summary, it seems that when the packets are routed in to the gateway from local network hosts, the src and dst addresses are changed to the public IPs of the tunnel -- at least from the perspective of the

On Sun, 23 Feb 2003 09:47:05 -0800, "Sam Leffler" <sam@errno.com> said: > >> Add a new config option IPSEC_FILTERGIF to control whether or not >> packets coming out of a GIF tunnel are re-processed by ipfw, >> et. al. By default they are not reprocessed. With the option they >> are. > > This may affect your ipfw/ipf rules. If you are happy with

Hi, Could not conceive an working set-up for an IPSEC VPN made with racoon/setkey on which I have one address on my side acting as an SNAT router for all traffic from my network to a network segment on the far side. my network --- my gateway ---------------------- remote network 10.0.0.0/24 - 10.0.0.1 (10.253.0.2) -- tunnel - 192.168.0.0/22 All traffic starts on my side, so if I can

I am trying to get a tunnel from a cisco 1760 with IOS 12.2.15.t13 to a freebsd 4.9 install with racoon. I have package version freebsd-20040408a and internal version 20001216 in my log file. I posted the full racoon and cisco log below my configs. Racoon keeps saying: 2004-07-26 16:24:03: DEBUG: isakmp.c:2295:isakmp_printpacket(): begin. 2004-07-26 16:24:03: DEBUG:

Hello, My name is Fermín Galán and I''m currently working with IPSec tunnels. Recently, I was setting a IPSec tunnelling sample scenario (maybe the simplest one :), where I observed some strange behaviour that I like to describe in the list, just in the case somebody knows what can be the cause, please. The scenario involves four hosts configured in the following way:

hello i am trying to set up ipsec in my network, for now just between two hosts, using to use AH & ESP in tunnel mode to get all of packet encrypted. keys are negotiated with racoon. mayby using tunnel mode in this case can seems strange, but i know what i am doing. after setting up everything i have done few tests with ping & tcpdump. but the results are very suprising. bellow is what i

Hi All, I need to establish an IPSec tunnel between two FreeBSD systems, using IPv6 addresses.The connetcion is host-to-host between two FreeBSD( RELEASE 4.11) systems with KAME IPSec implementation. I tried to establish the connection, but it has some problems which are explained below. |----------------->| host1-[mohan]| |host2-[ram]

Hi All, I need to establish an IPSec tunnel between two FreeBSD systems using IPv6 addresses.The connetcion is host-to-host between two FreeBSD( RELEASE 4.11) systems with KAME IPSec implementation. |----------------->| host1-[mohan]| |host2-[ram] |<-----------------| host1 IPv6 address : fe80::2b0:d0ff:fe6f:dfa0 host2 IPv6 address :

Hi, I have FreeBSD box with network interface having y.y.y.y ip address. On same box i configure next ipsec ploicys to process trafic from hardware ipsec enabled device. spdadd 0.0.0.0/0 x.x.x.x/24 any -P out ipsec esp/tunnel/y.y.y.y-z.z.z.z/require; spdadd x.x.x.x/24 0.0.0.0/0 any -P in ipsec esp/tunnel/z.z.z.z-y.y.y.y/require; Is it possible to see decrypted incoming packets, and outgoing

Hi, I''m asking my question here, because I could not find any answer to my problem, but I''m affraid shorewall is not the one to blame. First of all I''m using shorewall version 2.0.15 on two linux box. I set up an ipsec tunnel beetween those 2 boxes to be ables to connect 2 not routable subnetworks. Here is my network topology: 10.66.17.0/24 - 10.66.17.1 = eth0

Hi all :-) I have a problem with my current configuration of ipsec. I''m using ipsec with kernel 2.6 and racoon. I have two computers linked by wireless cards. The first (192.168.1.1 Zeus) is connected to internet through a DSL modem and the second (192.168.1.2 Memphis) is accessing internet through the first. I want with ipsec to encrypt all datas between the two computers. I can

Hi All, In the previous mail, I have sent is only the problem that occurs, because of using IPv6 addresses. But the connection works with IPv4 addresses without any problem. Thanx, Mohan. __________________________________________________________ How much free photo storage do you get? Store your friends 'n family snaps for FREE with Yahoo! Photos http://in.photos.yahoo.com

I will shortly be replacing a couple of proprietary VPN boxes with a FreeBSD solution. Section 10.10 of the Handbook has a detailed description of how to do this. However I remember a lot of discussion about a year ago about whether the gif interface was necessary to set up VPNs like this or whether it was just a convenience, for "getting the routing right". A number of people said