similar to: Immediately drop packet for default class ini htb

Hello, I''m trying to get my shaper to work, but have only a partial success. Can someone help me with that. My setup unfortunately is not so trivial, but I think some people could have similar one... 1. There is a router connected to the internet line via interface eth0 2. There are users connected to the router via two interfaces : eth1 and wlan0 3. All users are assigned private IP

I''m using a fairly large number of classes, andf borrowing is not working as expected... I''ve called this setting it up on an IMQ device with speed 1200/256 on a 1536/384 line. I''m then throwing a UDP data transfer at it that gets tossed in one of the class under parent 1:6. The classification is working fine, but when I try to ping out, ping times are in the 900ms

Hi all and tc Gururs i have patched the IMQ and htb to kernel, but when i do egress filtering, iam not able to see any traffic and excusted the following the commands modprobe imq numdevs=1 tc qdisc add dev imq0 handle 1: root htb default 1 tc class add dev imq0 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 100kbit tc qdisc add dev imq0 parent 1:1 handle 10: htb default 1 tc class add dev imq0 parent

Hi all, I''ve not been able to find an explanation of the relationship between prio and rate as they apply to the HTB technique. Hopefully someone on here will be able to help me. As I understand things, when prio values are assigned to an HTB setup, classes with a given prio value will only be serviced when there are no packets waiting in classes with a lower prio value. Now, does

Hello, I wrote a simple traffic shaping script (below) that should have allowed me to shape my internet traffic a bit (ppp0 - adsl 128kbit/64kbit; local interface eth0). The script works only partially - the speed is being limited but too much. Without running this script my download rate is about 10kBytes (with second computer also downloading at about 6kBytes). After running it my download speed

Hi, I''ve failed miserably in my endeavours so far and I''m at the point where help would be much appreciated. I want to have 3 bandwidth limited classes on my Internet interface. In each of those classes I want 3 prioritization bands, and then use "tc filters" to place the traffic into the correct class and priority. The problem is that the traffic

Hello to everybody, We want integrate in a router/firewall (Debian Based, 2.6 Kernel), an HTB shaper. The goal is to divide the traffic for classes of workstations, at example in three classes, let say A, B and C. Example: A 70 Mb/s B 20 Mb/s C 10 Mb/s If B don''t make traffic, 7/8 of 20Mb/s must be assigned to A and all the rest at B We have used CBQ and HTB, with poor succes. Anybody

Hi, I''m trying to setup QoS in my TSL box. Following to mailing list reccomendations I changed PSCHED_CPU but can''t get accurate shaping with HTB. I have disabled HYSTERESIS also (by setting it to 0). I have Intel Celeron 1.8Mhz (TSC supported I think). ******** My script ****** tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: htb default 22 r2q 10 # Class corresponding interface

Hi is it any tool like show.pl by Stef Coene to generate graph with classes but for HTB regards emil _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

Hello, I''ve just recently started to use IMQ and I got puzzled after seeing the imq usage example on the linuximq.net site: It was something like this: tc qdisc add dev imq0 handle 1: root htb default 1 tc class add dev imq0 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 1mbit tc qdisc add dev imq0 parent 1:1 handle 10: htb default 5 tc class add dev imq0 parent 10: classid 10:1 htb rate 256kbit

Hi everybody, i am new to this list so dont blame me if i will talk about nothing.. At this moment i am experimenting with htb + tc u32 filters , the problem is that i want some traffic to be unshaped so i did this.. tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 10: htb default 20 tc class add dev eth0 parent 10: classid 10:2 htb rate 256Kbit THIS IS TRAFFIC I WANT NOT TO BE SHAPED tc filter add dev eth0

Hello, after spending several hours reading archives, I decided to write new post. I successfully set up packet classification, made some basic HTB setup, made some simple graphical representation from HTB statistics data... BUT, I cannot figure out how to refine HTB to get this behaviour: I need that class "p2p" should be the last one to get some link capacity. If I set both RATE

Hi all I''m new in this list and i hope to lear and to help if possible. But firt i need help :-( I have this messege in my syslog when my classes and qdiscs goes down. Can any one know what does it mean? Thnx in advance. Yannick Arrimadas Bot Oct 14 16:09:27 pototogorri kernel: HTB init, kernel part version 3.17 Oct 14 16:09:27 pototogorri kernel: Unable to handle kernel paging

Hi folks, I`ve a problem to use HTB and SFQ. The first script, below, to show a simple configuration, does work fine...!!! But, in the second example, does not work, becouse i put more code to clasify the traffic by protocol, http and ftp in this case. Somebody can tell me the errors? Thx, in advance.- NOTICE: IMQ device is to asociate with ETH1 my external iface. SCRIPT que funciona:

hi all, i saw this message today & am reporting it(as it says) [root@cab1 surfNet]# tail -f /var/log/messages Sep 1 04:02:03 cab1 syslogd 1.4.1: restart. Sep 1 09:35:27 cab1 kernel: HTB: mindelay=500, report it please ! [root@cab1 root]# iptables -V iptables v1.2.6a [root@cab1 root]# tc -V tc utility, iproute2-ss020116 [root@cab1 root]# uname -a Linux cab1 2.4.19-r #2 Sun Aug 25 01:49:24

Hi, I am trying to setup a shaper for my linux box and I am experiencing some problems. What I am trying to do is priorizing packets on the egress link, therefore I have setup some prio classes etc. The priorizing seem to work but the problem is that the ceil parameter doesnt seem to work on non leafs. This is what stats show: > class htb 1:1 root rate 3000bit ceil 3000bit burst 1602b/8 mpu

Hi, I have typical situation, local LAN with private addresses, translated via NAT to internet. I need to shape ingress traffic (from internet to local LAN) in several HTB queues accorting to destination (private not public) IP. So I need mark packets to divide them to corresponding queue. According to http://www.docum.org/stef.coene/qos/kptd/ I thing I have only one way how to do it, because

Folks, I''m so surprised what happened to my box just in the few weeks lately. Here is my setup: INTERNET <----------> [eth0] SHAPER-BOX [eth1] <----------> USER-FARM both eth0 & eth1 got public ips (202.x.x.x) Why traffic monitored at eth0 is bigger than eth1 ? eth1 shaped just exactly the same as rate i defined in HTB. I just have 1024Kbps from my ISP and i defined the

Hello, First of all, I already contacted Martin Devera, the developer of HTB, and he told me to search for help on this mailinglist, thus I am describing my problems here now... I am kind of seriously annoyed by QoS as I have been trying for over 3 years to get it working properly - first I did not understand how it works, then it seemed not to work, then it was working perfectly for half a

Dear list, I want to rate-limit a couple of customers in both up and down directions. They get a different speed for traffic staying on our network than for traffic towards/from the internet, so that''s a master class and 2 child classes per customer per interface. I made a test setup with cbq which worked, but wasn''t too reliable I measured a tolerance of about 30%. I read