similar to: teql load balancing on tap devices

Thanks in advance! Summary: when I load netem and teql together, teql doesn''t work correctly. (If I load teql only, everything is fine) I loaded both netem and teql. Netem is associated with eth0, and teql is associated with both eth0 and eth1. But traffic only goes out of eth1. Attached are the commands that I used to configure teql and netem (on machine 1), and commands to

I''am using the following script to aggregate the bandwidth of one quad gigabit ethernet controller (pci-express). #!/bin/bash sysctl -w net.ipv4.tcp_reordering = 30 ifconfig eth1 up ifconfig eth2 up ifconfig eth3 up ifconfig eth4 up modprobe sch_teql tc qdisc add dev eth1 root teql0 tc qdisc add dev eth2 root teql0 tc qdisc del dev eth3 root teql0 tc qdisc del dev eth4 root teql0 ip link

I''m trying to follow Chapter 10 of the howto and apply it to two ubuntu machines each with two 802.11b/g interfaces. However, I cannot get a connection. I would like the 4 interfaces to create 2 ad hoc links on separate channels. I have set this up successfully with the following: /etc/dbus-1/event.d/25NetworkManager stop wlanconfig ath0 destroy wlanconfig ath0 create wlandev wifi0

Hello list, Please don''t shoot me. I know I''m doing something with bonding that bonding wasn''t made for. I just want to give it a try. I want a simple mechanism to have a failover on a 24Mbit line to a 2Mbit line in case the 24Mbit line goes down. Between A and B there are two lines: a 24Mbit and a 2Mbit. I use two OpenVPN tunnels with tap devices: +-- tap0 (A)---

Hi everybody, I want to do the following setup : | | Tun1 - Link 1 | Tun1 | | Router A | teql | INTERNET Link - | | teql |router B | | Tun2 - Link 2 | Tun2 | | This should permit to agregate Link 1 and Link 2 (less the cost of the encapsulation). The two tunnels are GRE ip tunnel. It seems to work fine

Hi all, I want to implement a "weighted" teql that can send packets to interfaces based on their "weights". To do this, I want to create multiple virtual network interfaces, and add them to teql. Since teql will send packets to each interface in a round-robin way, a weighted teql is achieved (my guess). I already have two physical network interfaces, eth0 and eth1. I

Hi there, I have two ethernet connections of 2Mbit/s each and I''m trying to add them together to one 4Mbit/s connection but I cannot get more than approximate 1Mbit/s! My setup: I have a LAN (10.2.18.0/24), connected to a larger network (10.0.0.0/8) by two WAN-connections with 2Mbit/s each. On each end I have a Linux router. I first setup the routers to use TEQL with one of the

Hi! We have 2 lines with 2 mbit each. I have to set up a configuration like the following: - if both lines work, grant 3 mbit to a web service running on a server in our DMZ - if one line fails, grant all the remaining 2 mbit to that service - if the service doesn''t need all the bandwidth, use the remaining for other services I read through the HOWTO, and figured out that I need TEQL to

Dear Gurus, Can you please help/guide me with the following: I have 3 NICs in my Linux RH 9 (kernel 2.4.20) machine. (eth0, eth1 and eth2). I want to setup a 'link equalizer' (teql) between eth0 and eth1. This I am able to do with the required commands (using the utilities 'tc' and 'ip'). Now I need to setup a bridge between eth2 and this new interface

HI, I have a problem with nat on teql devices, i set the nat on iptables and he''s accept well , but don''t work ... he don''t masq or nat anything, i try using -j MASQUERADE too, but without results.. i m using the command: iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -j SNAT -s 10.0.0.0/24 --to ip-teql-device On kernel 2.2x with ipchains works great.

Sorry this is the right message. Hi all, in my school I have: - two Netopia router for ADSL (perform NAT), - one linux box with 3 ethernet card I want to make a load balancing on the two ADSL line. I have configured the system as follow: The LAN interface, of the two ADSL router, have address (A) 192.168.0.254 (B) 192.168.2.254 The 3 ethernet card, on the linux box, have address: -eth2

I have set up one of our routers to use a TEQL Device to direct the outbound traffic but I would like to have a bit more control with how it sends out traffic. Is there a "better" EQL device that would allow me to say set the rate of the connections and have it fill up the first pipe then dump to the second then the third and so on so that an outbound connection could use the combined

Yesterday I posted a question, but I guess too much detail is provided that no one would bother to read, so I rephrase the question and hopefully some one may be willing to read. Sorry to spam. I am using TEQL on two computers, each with two network interfaces. The two eth0 are connected directly, and the two eth1 are connected via a gateway (a linux machine). The problem is that when I send

TEQL and Subnet problem I have a network topology shown below, and I am trying to use TEQL. P1, P2 and P3 are three linux machines, and each has two network cards. P2 and P3 are connected in two ways: (1) directed connection between P2.eth0 and P3.eth0; (2) connection via P1. P1 acts as the gateway. TEQL is installed on P2 and P3 to load-balance packet transmission by round-robin sending packets

Is it possible to detect if a link is down in a TEQL device, so that I will receive a mail on such occasion? TIA -- Groeten, Joost Kraaijeveld Askesis B.V. Molukkenstraat 14 6524NB Nijmegen tel: 024-3888063 / 06-51855277 fax: 024-3608416 web: www.askesis.nl

OK, I spammed the mailing list recently, but I will be fired if I can''t solve the problem today. (just kidding, but I did waste lots of time on it :( ) The common configuration for teql is for two computers connected directly with two links. My topology is a little different: one link is connected directly, but the other is connected through a gateway. My problem is teql can''t

What is the maximum value for "prio"? It seems that for htb its maximum is 7. Is that right? R. -- ___________________________________________________________________ It''s so simple to be wise. Just think of something stupid to say and say the opposite. +------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Richard Lucassen, Utrecht

Packets going to a 2.6 kernel IPSEC tunnel do not seem to pass the POSTROUTING chain. Is that correct? R. -- ___________________________________________________________________ It''s so simple to be wise. Just think of something stupid to say and say the opposite. +------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Richard Lucassen, Utrecht

Is it possible to create 1 filter rule using fw selectors AND u32 selectors? Richard. -- ___________________________________________________________________ Recursion: see recursion +------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Richard Lucassen, Utrecht | | Public key and email address: | |

Is it possible (one way or another) to guarantee or to limit bandwidth of 1 session? E.g.: RDP: 750kbit rate, 1Mbit ceil default: 250kbit rate, 1Mbit ceil max bw per RDP connection: 100kbit guaranteed bw per RDP session: 20kbit R. -- ___________________________________________________________________ It''s so simple to be wise. Just think of something stupid to say and say the