similar to: IPSEC packets not passing POSTROUTING chain

Is it possible to create 1 filter rule using fw selectors AND u32 selectors? Richard. -- ___________________________________________________________________ Recursion: see recursion +------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Richard Lucassen, Utrecht | | Public key and email address: | |

What is the maximum value for "prio"? It seems that for htb its maximum is 7. Is that right? R. -- ___________________________________________________________________ It''s so simple to be wise. Just think of something stupid to say and say the opposite. +------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Richard Lucassen, Utrecht

Is it possible to negate the "match" to the ip? I want to match all traffic to dport 80 NOT going to dst 1.2.3.4: $TC filter add dev ${DEV_IFB} parent 1:0 prio 2 protocol ip u32 \ match ip protocol 0x6 0xff \ match ip dport 80 0xffff \ match ip dst 1.2.3.4/32 \ classid 1:14 I can''t find it in the docs. I tried "!" "\!" and "not" in several

Hello list, I have these sorts of filters, putting traffic into the appropiate classid (1:15 is the default class): ${TC} filter add dev ${DEV_IFB} parent 1:0 prio 1 protocol ip u32 \ match ip protocol 0x6 0xff \ match ip sport 22 0xffff \ classid 1:11 # ssh ${TC} filter add dev ${DEV_IFB} parent 1:0 prio 1 protocol ip u32 \ match ip protocol 0x6 0xff \ match ip dport 22

Hello list, Please don''t shoot me. I know I''m doing something with bonding that bonding wasn''t made for. I just want to give it a try. I want a simple mechanism to have a failover on a 24Mbit line to a 2Mbit line in case the 24Mbit line goes down. Between A and B there are two lines: a 24Mbit and a 2Mbit. I use two OpenVPN tunnels with tap devices: +-- tap0 (A)---

I''m a newbie to tc and after some experimenting I have the following problem: # tc qdisc show qdisc sfq 8006: dev ipsec0 quantum 1514b perturb 15sec I can''t get rid of this entry. Is there a way to clear all entries? I tried all sorts of "tc qdisc del xxx" but nothing seems to work. It says: RTNETLINK answers: No such file or directory What syntax do I need to

Is it possible (one way or another) to guarantee or to limit bandwidth of 1 session? E.g.: RDP: 750kbit rate, 1Mbit ceil default: 250kbit rate, 1Mbit ceil max bw per RDP connection: 100kbit guaranteed bw per RDP session: 20kbit R. -- ___________________________________________________________________ It''s so simple to be wise. Just think of something stupid to say and say the

I have 1 100MB NIC with two 2MB-subnets trough a router behind it. I''d like to create multiple default classes: 1: + |\_ 1:10 default, ceiling 100000kbit, rate 96000kbit | |\_ 1:11 ceiling 2048kbit, rate 2048kbit | | | |\_1:110 ceiling 2048kbit, rate 1536kbit | \_1:111 ceiling 2048kbit, rate 512kbit (default subnet1) | \_ 1:12 ceiling 2048kbit, rate

Hi, Could not conceive an working set-up for an IPSEC VPN made with racoon/setkey on which I have one address on my side acting as an SNAT router for all traffic from my network to a network segment on the far side. my network --- my gateway ---------------------- remote network 10.0.0.0/24 - 10.0.0.1 (10.253.0.2) -- tunnel - 192.168.0.0/22 All traffic starts on my side, so if I can

I set up this config: +------+ -+ ISP1 +--+ +------+ | +-------+ +--+ linux | +------+ | +-------+ -+ ISP2 +--+ +------+ No problem. Standard setup with two ISP''s. Both routed subnets. Default gateway is ISP1. No magic here. Now I put a server behind the Linux box. I want the server to be reachable on an /extra/ IP in the routed subnet of ISP2. +------+ -+ ISP1

Hello I will briefly draw the situation Router with one interface eth0 , to local network 10.123.0.0/16 on a local network ADSL modem with IP 10.123.10.11 I want to use 10.123.10.11 as a connection to internet . Because of that I have created default route "ip route add default via 10.123.10.11 dev eth0" I do not want my ADSL modem to do NATing , since it shows to be slow. I have

Hello, I have the following setup on linux 2.6.32... CentOS 6.x : ipsec tunnel eth0-10.255.3.254/25 - eth1-pub add1 <-> eth1-pub add2 - eth0-10.255.5.254/25 I am trying to SNAT remote private address 10.255.5.128/25 packets when they come out of the ipsec tunnel to make it appear like it was from local address 10.255.3.254. I am doing a source ping from the right side to a device on the

http://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=680 --- Comment #6 from Richard Lucassen <rl-20100926 at xaq.nl> 2011-08-26 14:54:09 --- (In reply to comment #5) > I'm having exactly the same problem. Kernel is 2.6.34.7-56.fc13.x86_64. I > tested the solution (adding the route) and works. Anyhow, it's only usefull for > testing, as the IP address of the "external

Hi, I am trying to setup a shaper for my linux box and I am experiencing some problems. What I am trying to do is priorizing packets on the egress link, therefore I have setup some prio classes etc. The priorizing seem to work but the problem is that the ceil parameter doesnt seem to work on non leafs. This is what stats show: > class htb 1:1 root rate 3000bit ceil 3000bit burst 1602b/8 mpu

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=498 cfilin@intermedia.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |chip@innovates.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are

On Sat, 28 Dec 2019 17:02:09 +0100 richard lucassen via nsd-users <nsd-users at lists.nlnetlabs.nl> wrote: > The problem is (was) that I used "include:" statements in nsd.conf > to load zone information. Apparently nsd does not reread the include > files upon a SIGHUP. I scripted everything into 1 file and a HUP > rereads the zone info now. Wrong, I made a mistake it

Hi, I am trying to categorize the network traffic and to send it out across two different providers. For this I mark the packets in the firewall (in the PREROUTING chain of table mangle), and then use another routing table for the marked packets, which has a different gateway from the main routing table. Basicaly I am following the cookbook example in this page:

Hi guys, Can you take a look at this? :) +-----------+ | | eth1-|- | | -|-eth0---LAN--- | | eth2-|- | | | +-----------+ - eth0 is connected to the LAN having the IP=LAN_IP eth1 is connected to the first ISP having IP=ISP_IP_1 and GW=ISP_GW_1 eth2 is connected to the second ISP having IP=ISP_IP_2 and GW=ISP_GW_2 I need

Hello everybody. I''m running linux 2.6.19 with nth match to alternatively snat outgoing connections to two different ip addresses for load balancing between two adsl lines: Here is: $IPTABLES -t nat -A POSTROUTING -s my_ip --protocol tcp -m multiport --dports 80,443 -m statistic --mode nth --every 2 -j SNAT --to adslA $IPTABLES -t nat -A POSTROUTING -s my_ip --protocol tcp -m multiport

I have a very simple setup exactly as described in the HOWTO section " 4.2. Routing for multiple uplinks/providers". One is cable (eth1: dhcp) and the other is PPPoE (ppp0). I used the following commands to configure the routing once all of my interfaces are up and i have configured SNATing for them: ip route add 66.11.173.0/24 dev ppp0 src 66.11.173.224 table 11 ip route add default