Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "Teql and NetEm can''t work together"
2007 Jul 19
0
tc qdisc TEQL limited to two interfaces? [ 1.8Gbps ]
I''am using the following script to aggregate the bandwidth of one quad
gigabit ethernet controller (pci-express).
#!/bin/bash
sysctl -w net.ipv4.tcp_reordering = 30
ifconfig eth1 up
ifconfig eth2 up
ifconfig eth3 up
ifconfig eth4 up
modprobe sch_teql
tc qdisc add dev eth1 root teql0
tc qdisc add dev eth2 root teql0
tc qdisc del dev eth3 root teql0
tc qdisc del dev eth4 root teql0
ip link
2005 Jun 21
0
TEQL and Subnet problem (reformatted)
TEQL and Subnet problem
I have a network topology shown below, and I am trying to use TEQL. P1,
P2 and P3 are three linux machines, and each has two network cards. P2
and P3 are connected in two ways: (1) directed connection between
P2.eth0 and P3.eth0; (2) connection via P1. P1 acts as the gateway. TEQL
is installed on P2 and P3 to load-balance packet transmission by
round-robin sending packets
2005 Jun 21
2
TEQL and Subnet problem
TEQL and Subnet problem
I have a network topology shown below, and I am trying to use TEQL. My
problem is: When I ping to P3.teql0 from P2 ("[P2]# ping 16.119.144.66"),
the traffic can never go from P2.eth1, and all traffic only goes to
P1.eth0. What P2.eth1 (16.119.144.33) did is broadcasting an ARP asking
for the MAC address of 16.119.144.66, although I have specified the route
to
2005 Jun 22
2
Question: TEQL via gateway
Yesterday I posted a question, but I guess too much detail is provided
that no one would bother to read, so I rephrase the question and
hopefully some one may be willing to read. Sorry to spam.
I am using TEQL on two computers, each with two network interfaces. The
two eth0 are connected directly, and the two eth1 are connected via a
gateway (a linux machine). The problem is that when I send
2000 Oct 10
3
TEQL: 2 Mbit eth1 + 2Mbit eth2 = 1Mbit teql0
Hi there,
I have two ethernet connections of 2Mbit/s each and I''m trying to add them
together to one 4Mbit/s connection but I cannot get more than approximate
1Mbit/s!
My setup:
I have a LAN (10.2.18.0/24), connected to a larger network (10.0.0.0/8) by
two WAN-connections with 2Mbit/s each. On each end I have a Linux router. I
first setup the routers to use TEQL with one of the
2007 Aug 24
0
Wireless Ad Hoc and TEQL
I''m trying to follow Chapter 10 of the howto and apply it to two
ubuntu machines each with two 802.11b/g interfaces. However, I cannot
get a connection.
I would like the 4 interfaces to create 2 ad hoc links on separate
channels. I have set this up successfully with the following:
/etc/dbus-1/event.d/25NetworkManager stop
wlanconfig ath0 destroy
wlanconfig ath0 create wlandev wifi0
2005 Jun 23
6
urgent TEQL problem
OK, I spammed the mailing list recently, but I will be fired if I can''t
solve the problem today. (just kidding, but I did waste lots of time on
it :( )
The common configuration for teql is for two computers connected
directly with two links. My topology is a little different: one link is
connected directly, but the other is connected through a gateway. My
problem is teql can''t
2002 May 02
0
Using TEQL with two ADSL connection
Sorry this is the right message.
Hi all,
in my school I have:
- two Netopia router for ADSL (perform NAT),
- one linux box with 3 ethernet card
I want to make a load balancing on the two ADSL line.
I have configured the system as follow:
The LAN interface, of the two ADSL router, have address
(A) 192.168.0.254
(B) 192.168.2.254
The 3 ethernet card, on the linux box, have address:
-eth2
2005 Aug 10
0
teql on virtual network interfaces ?
Hi all,
I want to implement a "weighted" teql that can send packets to
interfaces based on their "weights". To do this, I want to create
multiple virtual network interfaces, and add them to teql. Since teql
will send packets to each interface in a round-robin way, a weighted
teql is achieved (my guess).
I already have two physical network interfaces, eth0 and eth1. I
2003 May 07
0
teql and gre tunnel
Hi everybody,
I want to do the following setup :
| | Tun1 - Link 1 | Tun1 | |
Router A | teql | INTERNET Link - | | teql |router B
| | Tun2 - Link 2 | Tun2 | |
This should permit to agregate Link 1 and Link 2 (less the cost of the
encapsulation). The two tunnels are GRE ip tunnel.
It seems to work fine
2005 Jun 22
0
Help: NIST Net or NetEm ?
Hi,
I want to study the multi-path TCP behavior (single TCP connection over
multi-paths), and I am setting up the test bed. I have two machines,
each with two network cards. I have directly connected two eth0, and I
am trying to figure out how connect two eth1 to control the properties
of this connection, so that I can study the TCP on multiple different
paths (different in terms of latency,
2007 Apr 18
0
[Bridge] Bridge + Teql!
Dear Gurus,
Can you please help/guide me with the following:
I have 3 NICs in my Linux RH 9 (kernel 2.4.20) machine. (eth0, eth1
and eth2). I want to setup a 'link equalizer' (teql) between eth0 and
eth1. This I am able to do with the required commands (using the
utilities 'tc' and 'ip').
Now I need to setup a bridge between eth2 and this new interface
2005 Jul 25
0
teql load balancing on tap devices
Hello list,
I''d like to use teql with tap devices (two OpenVPN tunnels). This works,
but the doc /usr/src/linux-<version>/net/sched/sch_teql.c says:
"1. Slave devices MUST be active devices, i.e., they must raise the
tbusy signal and generate EOI events. If you want to equalize virtual
devices like tunnels, use a normal eql device."
I can''t find if tap devices
2006 Jun 01
13
Not understanding network setup!!
Hi to all,
+-------+ eth1 +-------+
| |==========| |
''network 1'' ----| A | | B |---- ''network 2''
| |==========| |
+-------+ eth2 +-------+
A and B are routers
# tc qdisc add dev eth1 root teql0
# tc qdisc add dev eth2 root teql0
# ip link set
2007 Mar 30
1
Please Help: applying multiple different delays with netem
I''m trying to use tc and netem to delay packets from several different
machines as they exit via eth0. Assume two source IPs, 10.0.0.122 and
10.0.0.133. I''d like to delay packets from the first one by 200ms, and
packets from the second one by 300 ms. Any other traffic should be sent
out normally. Here''s what I tried:
# make three classes, 1:1, 1:2, and 1:3:
tc qdisc add
2004 Mar 24
3
IP Masquerade issues
Okay here is my setup:
Gentoo Box running 2.6.4 w/ 4 NICs
1 NIC is for internal network
3 NICs are for external network
The machine has a static address assigned to the internal network nic. This
nic runs dhcp and dns forwarding. The other 3 nics have external dynamic IP
addresses. All will have the same gateway. There are 3 NICs because this is
a very large pipe, that will only allocate a
2002 Oct 31
4
Egress shaping over multiple interfaces?
Hello,
After reading the excellent HOWTO I got traffic shaping working nicely over
ethernet devices on a test setup. I can''t put this setup live though, because
our main firewall has three 2mbit hdlc interfaces instead of a single device.
We are using multipath routing using iproute2 nexthop at the moment, and that
works fine for firewalling. But now I have a need for shaping and
2004 Jul 04
0
TEQL+HTB (?)
Hi!
We have 2 lines with 2 mbit each. I have to set up a configuration like
the following:
- if both lines work, grant 3 mbit to a web service running on a server in
our DMZ
- if one line fails, grant all the remaining 2 mbit to that service
- if the service doesn''t need all the bandwidth, use the remaining for
other services
I read through the HOWTO, and figured out that I need TEQL to
2004 Aug 31
1
netem usage example
I''m trying to setup a netem delay with no luck (using iproute2-2.6.8,
compilation broke during arpd compile, so I use the
tc binary in the tc/ subdir, there''s also a q_netem.so there).
kernel is 2.6.8.1, compile with CPU cycle counter as time reference.
I was using sch_delay of 2.6.7 happily with something like:
tc qdisc add dev eth0 root 1: delay latency 1ms rate 35M
now I use:
2006 Jul 17
1
How to add multiple filters and netem rules on a single interface?
Hi!
We want to run TCP streams to several port numbers through one interface,
each with a different delay set by Netem.
E.g. TCP streams to port 80 could have 50ms delay, while TCP streams to port
81 could have 100 ms delay and so on.
We have tried to solve this by using a combination of tc filter and netem
rules, but we can''t get it quite right.
We are considering one class per port,