similar to: Please: "judge" this script

I copied and tried to adapt to my necessities the excellent script of Pedro Larroy, but I am inexperienced in QoS and I have doubts. I have cablemodem to Internet 1024kbit down and 256kbit up, through eth0. The LAN has eth1 and NAT. I formed the band so that shaping goes by the eth1 (of the LAN) with bandwidth maximum CEIL=768. But I observe that the traffic sometimes accelerates and other

Hello all, I am trying to configure a linux box to make some QoS into my netowork and, at the same box, control my clients bandwidth. I have this classes created: ---------------------------------------------------------------- UP="eth0" # wan infocontabil DL01="eth2" # lan clientes $TC qdisc del dev $DL01 root 2> /dev/null >

Hello...I have a Slackware based machine doing routing & QoS for my internal LAN users... It has two interfaces: eth1(100mbps) that connects to the aDSL modem(USR 9105) and eth0(100mbps) that connects to my local LAN... I''am using shorewall as a firewall...i think it''s configured well as it''s working as i want and i pass all the online firewall tests... :D All lan

Dear All I am a newbie to traffic control and i am trying to setup bandwidth restriction in my local network as well as internet access to users. I got around 60 pcs in my lab and i am planning to divide bandwidth based on classes. I am using iptables to mark packets and then route the traffic to the specified class. Following is the network setup Two network cards in the server eth0

Hello lartc maintainers and users! I have a router with two NICs. One NIC is connected to the Internet and the other to my internal LAN. I made a script for priorizing interactive traffic. The script matches TOS Minimize-Delay for priorizing interactive trafic, and fwmark for metropolitan packets. I have two root classes (simulating two circuits) : 1:1 for internet and 1:3 for metropolitan.

Hi there, i tried to setup up a Linuxbridge for prioritize some interactive (Citrix / https) Traffic to 1.2.3.4 on my ADSL Link, but i think it work not correct. Overview: Router <->Linux Bridge<->internal Net eth1 eth0 This is my Script (with friendly support from the Linux Advanced Routing & Traffic control Howto) #!/bin/sh # # ADSL

Hi, I''m having issues with policing my incoming traffic by matching packet marks made by iptables. I''ve checked as many sites and guides as I can find, and I seem to be doing the exact same thing as they all are, but there''s still no success. As such, I was wondering if anyone can have a quick look to see if I''ve done anything obviously stupid? Essentially, I

Hello to all people there . Can i guarantee ICMP respond time no metter how loaded is internet line . i have typical NATed enviroiment like External IP |linux router| LAN - 192.168.0.0/24 i have example setup with IMQ but is it possible to be done also if i attache htb to eth0 and eth1 for example . if i start shaper ping i better that without shaper but it''s not guarantted i mean

Hi, with the attached config my gaming ping is still +20ms, even if the line isn''t saturated..can anybody give me a hint how to get a better response time? my line: 1024/128kbit outbound: one htb qdisc for gaming (7kbps) prio 0 ceil 14kbps<- should get more traffic when needed. Htb again for irc and default. inbound: css, irc, p2p, default <- same shema as before, give css

(list admin, please cancel the same post from my other email address -- forgot to change it on first submission) I need to setup QoS on a linux router/firewall I maintain. I spent 10 hours reading everything I could find on QoS/HTB/iproute2 and came up with what I thought made sense for my situation. So I deployed it and BOOM! KERNEL PANIC! Not what I was expecting... now the debugging begins.

Hi, I''ve read ADSL-Bandwidth-Management-HOWTO http://www.tldp.org/HOWTO/ADSL-Bandwidth-Management-HOWTO/implementation.htm l#AEN166 and I''ve a doubt from script: [ ... ] # DNS name resolution (small packets) iptables -t mangle -A MYSHAPER-OUT -p udp -j MARK --set-mark 21 [ ... ] That is a bug ? I think that " DNS name resolution (small packets) " is better

Hi, I have a router/firewall running Linux (like the most of you) and I wanted to do some traffic control. I''ve created an root PRIO qdisc like the example in paragraph 9.5.3.1 (http://www.lartc.org/howto/lartc.qdisc.classful.html#AEN903) with three SFQ child-classes. I wanted for interactive (ssh, telnet, ftp-control) and dns-traffic to be placed in the first queue, http should go in

Hi All I am fighting this for 3 days and could not find any reason it is not working the way I want to (or I the way think it should). Internet output interface = eth2 (htb qdisc) Internet input interface = imq0 (eth2 attached - htb qdisc) main class = imq0 1:1 sub1 = 1:ffff (default) sub2 = 1:10 (src ports 1433/tcp or 1434/tcp or 81/tcp or 82/tcp) sub3 = 1:11 (src and dst port 25/tcp )

Hi all, my IMQ device works OK (thanks to Andy Furniss), but now I''ve problems to attach the traffic in the qdisc''s. This is my conf: ----------------------------------------------------------------------- INET | |eth0 300Kbps ROUTER (NAT) |eth1 | LAN ----------------------------------------------------------------------- MAX=300 tc qdisc add dev imq0 root handle 1: htb

Folks, I''m so surprised what happened to my box just in the few weeks lately. Here is my setup: INTERNET <----------> [eth0] SHAPER-BOX [eth1] <----------> USER-FARM both eth0 & eth1 got public ips (202.x.x.x) Why traffic monitored at eth0 is bigger than eth1 ? eth1 shaped just exactly the same as rate i defined in HTB. I just have 1024Kbps from my ISP and i defined the

Hi I have the following problem: I''ve created qos script which shapes traffic on outgoing interface eth1. More - less it looks like this : ------------------------CUT------------------------------------------------------ #root qdisc and class for eth1 $tc qdisc add dev eth1 root handle 1:0 htb default 19 $tc class add dev eth1 parent 1:0 classid 1:1 htp ratel ${CEIL_UP}kbit ceil

HI all I just came across one of the threads on the LARTC. In the thread it had this. So my question is, for the following rules, would these increase my browsing / traffic, and if so, how. iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -p tcp -m tcp --tcp-flags SYN,RST,ACK ACK -m length --length 0:128 -j TOS --set-tos Minimize-Delay iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -p tcp -m tcp --tcp-flags SYN,RST,ACK ACK

#!/bin/sh PPP=(ppp0 ppp1) IP=(`ifconfig ${PPP[0]}|sed -n 2p|column -s ":" -t|awk ''{print $3}''` `ifconfig ${PPP[1]}|sed -n 2p|column -s ":" -t|awk ''{print $3}''`) GATEWAY=(`ifconfig ${PPP[0]}|sed -n 2p|column -s ":" -t|awk ''{print $5}''` `ifconfig ${PPP[1]}|sed -n 2p|column -s ":" -t|awk ''{print

As seen on my post at: http://www.sveasoft.com/modules/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?p=28112#28112 This works very well... It does NOT work with stable 4.0! sveasoft will be issuing a bug fix for this (4.1) in the near future. Final Rev of working script w/ asterisk support I'm not going to run alchemy on production machines until it is stablish. Remember to set your uplink properly and to set

Hi all, I''m trying to marking packets with iptables and use tc filter to catch this packets. I configure my device: tc qdisc del root dev eth0 tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: htb default 10 tc class add dev eth0 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 3000kbit ceil 6000kbit burst 15k tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:1 classid 1:10 htb rate 2000kbit ceil 4000kbit burst 15k tc qdisc add dev eth0