similar to: About multihop route decision without Julian''s patches

Hi! I have many problems getting this thing to work. There''s a host with two network interfaces, where there are two routers to Internet in two separated networks. The host uses multihop routing for deciding to which router send the packets... but the routing decision is wrong made. Some packets with source address of one NIC, go to other network. I have a host with three NICs in it:

Hi! In our students'' hostel we have 6 DSL lines (dialups to different providers); we have set up a linux box (currently running 2.6.11-rc2-mm2, but the problem described hereafter also applies to previous 2.6-series kernels) with help from http://lartc.org/howto/lartc.rpdb.multiple-links.html#AEN298 Our Setup looks like this: 10.0.0.0/8 10.70.255.1 +----------+ +-----------+ |

--AkbCVLjbJ9qUtAXD Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi all! On behalf of the netfilter core team I have the following announcement: The following kernel versions habe a bug in include/linux/list.h, which causes netfilter's connection tracking code to misbehave: 2.4.10-pre10 2.4.10-pre11 2.4.10-pre12 2.4.10

Hi! I''m still trying to solve the problem, about which I already posted in these lists... I''ve been trying to understand where packet routing and NAT is being done. The schemes are quite clear, when it''s about the _first_ packet of a NAT connection (when it enters the NAT table). But it isn''t that clear about the packets NAT''ed by the connection

Hi! (I sent other mails some time ago, about not-using the Julian''s patches). When I try the configuration from Nano.txt, having the Julian''s patches applied, only the first ''hop'' of the routing table "222" is used (according to tables shown in Nano.txt). I saw that this question was asked some time ago, with no answer. Maybe someone can tell me the

Hello, I had a raid1 btrfs (540GB) on vanilla 3.6.3, a disk failed, and removed it at power off, plugged in a new one, partitioned it (to 110GB, by error), and added it to btrfs. I tried to remove the missing device, and it said "Input/output error" after a while. Next attempts simply gave "Invalid argument". I repartitioned, rebooted the system, and made the partition grow:

--Qz2CZ664xQdCRdPu Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="BI5RvnYi6R4T2M87" Content-Disposition: inline --BI5RvnYi6R4T2M87 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi! Unfortunately there is a very unpopular announcement to be made on this list: A netfilter security advisory. Phillipe Biondi has been

--k1lZvvs/B4yU6o8G Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi! It is my duty to inform you about this very unfortunate security issue in the IRC DCC connection tracking code. The following mail has just been sent to bugtraq, Linux Vendors have been informed two weeks in advance in order to prepare their advisories.

--J2SCkAp4GZ/dPZZf Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi All! I have just released a new version of ulogd, the userspace logging deamon meant to be used in combination with the ULOG target of netfilter/iptables patch-o-matic. This new release contains a bugfix, where in certain cases ulogd ran into an endless loop,

--/aVve/J9H4Wl5yVO Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi! I've finally managed to install a RedHat 7.3, RedHat 9 and Conectiva 9 on one of my development boxes. This provided the opportunity to build some 'official' iptables-1.2.8 and ulogd-1.0.0 RPM's for the respective distributions. You can get

Hello, some time ago we discussed on #btrfs that the nocow attribute for files wasn''t working (around 3.3 or 3.4 kernels). That was evident by files fragmenting even with the attribute set. Chris mentioned to find a fix quickly for that, and posted some lines of change into irc. But recently someone mentioned that 3.6-rc looks like still not respecting nocow for files. Is there really

Hi all I have a trouble configuring the qdiscs, when I indicate the "perturb 10" option to tc, i gives me this error: tc qdisc add dev eth0 parent 5:1323 handle 1323 sfq perturb 10 RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument if I don''t put the "perturb 10" option, it works. another question is about iptables, when I indicate the " --set-mark" option: iptables -t

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68 Summary: Kernel panic Product: netfilter/iptables Version: linux-2.4.x Platform: i386 OS/Version: RedHat Linux Status: NEW Severity: critical Priority: P2 Component: unknown AssignedTo: laforge@netfilter.org ReportedBy:

--SLDf9lqlvOQaIe6s Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Everybody! The netfilter core team proudly announces: The new netfilter/ipables project homepage. http://www.netfilter.org/ http://www.iptables.org/ as well as the old locations: http://netfilter.gnumonks.org/ http://netfilter.samba.org/

--/aVve/J9H4Wl5yVO Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Everybody! I had to change the ulog.patch in recent patch-o-matic to use a different netlink family (it's now 5 instead of 4). This means, you will have to recompile your ulogd or any other application in order to make it work. That's also why I have

--yrj/dFKFPuw6o+aM Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi! Today the netfilter core team announces the new bug-tracking system for netfilter/iptables. This step really was necessarry, because I started to get the feeling that I'm losing track of all the concurrent issues. So if you are aware of any bugs in the

--mYCpIKhGyMATD0i+ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi! I have released Version 1.01 of the iptables userspace logging daemon (ulogd).=20 The new Version is available as tar.bz2 only and can be retrieved from: ftp://ftp.netfilter.org/pub/ulogd/ulogd-1.01.tar.bz2 There is a GPG signature for verification of the

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=549 Summary: kernel oops when trying to remove ip_conntrack module Product: netfilter/iptables Version: linux-2.6.x Platform: x86_64 OS/Version: Fedora Status: NEW Severity: critical Priority: P2 Component: unknown AssignedTo:

I know this isn''t a shorewall question, but I hope somebody might be able to point me the right direction. here''s the error: Apr 10 18:19:07 trinity kernel: BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [00000001] code: modprobe/11068 Apr 10 18:19:07 trinity kernel: caller is ip_conntrack_init+0x255/0x369 [ip_conntrack] Apr 10 18:19:07 trinity kernel: [<c02ec398>]

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=511 Summary: Premature ip_conntrack timer expiry on 3+ window size advertisements Product: netfilter/iptables Version: linux-2.6.x Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P2 Component: ip_conntrack