similar to: Question regarding iptables marks for HTB

Hi, I have the following config: 1 PC with 3 NICs, that shares internet connection to LAN. eth0 uses a public IP ($public_ip_1) eth1 uses a private IP ($private_ip) eth2 uses a public IP ($public_ip_2) I have a webserver and a mailserver accesible by $public_ip_1 (eth0) I have a LAN with all terminals using private IPs, and $private_ip (eth1) as gateway. $public_ip_1 and $public_ip_2 are from

Hi, I´d like to create two classes for HTB, one of them to limit traffic for everything except browsing and the other to limit traffic only for browsing. How can I mark all traffic except the one related to browsing with iptables? Currently I mark all traffic related to one IP with: iptables -A PREROUTING -i eth2 -t mangle -p tcp -s $IP_ADDRESS -j MARK --set-mark 10 Should I use three rules

Dear All, I’m working with Fedora Core 3, kernel 2.9.1, MPLS-for-Linux-4.193, and having some problems when create a HTB queue. ALL packets goes to the default queue, they don’t care about any mark or ip field I use to enqueue them. : -/ That’s the deal, all packets that incoming the interface eth2 are classified and have theirs TOS field changed following some qos policy at the PREROUTING

Hi.... Help me please!!! I am using Linux Redhat as gateway of the my network to internet. I am to making NAT and firewall. In my iptables script, I need make 3 MARKs for the same packet, as following # It marks the packets that will go for link ADSL (I have 2 links - adsl 2Mb and ''dedicate link'' 256Mb ) # I am using ''ip rule / ip route'' to make this

Folks, I''m so surprised what happened to my box just in the few weeks lately. Here is my setup: INTERNET <----------> [eth0] SHAPER-BOX [eth1] <----------> USER-FARM both eth0 & eth1 got public ips (202.x.x.x) Why traffic monitored at eth0 is bigger than eth1 ? eth1 shaped just exactly the same as rate i defined in HTB. I just have 1024Kbps from my ISP and i defined the

Hi.... Help me please!!! I am using Linux Redhat as router of the my network. I am to making NAT and firewall. In my iptables script, I need make 3 MARKs for the same packet, as following # It marks the packets that will go for link ADSL (I have 2 links - adsl 2Mb and ''dedicate link'' 256Mb ) # I am using ''ip rule / ip route'' to make this iptables

Hi, i am running imq + htb on my router , the situation is like this eth0 = uplink to my provider eth1 = 1st customer eth2 = 2nd customer eth3 = 3th customer eth0 has limit 512 and i want to share this between eth1 eth2 and eth3 , but not working , this is the script i used, \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ #!/bin/sh

I know that I have asked this before of the list. However we just changed ISP and ip's and I'm having this issue again. I have a linux firewall using iptables with the following config eth0 = WAN 1 eth1 = LAN 1 eth2 = WAN 2 I'm trying to forward all traffic that makes a request from eth2 to an internal IP on eth1. These are the folloing rules that I have set up. iptables -t nat -A

I have many iptables setmark commands, but as soon as there is one match, I would like to skip all the rest. How to do this. -------not-working-not-mark-zero-is-not-accepted--------- iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING ..... -j MARK --set-mark ..... iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -m MARK ! --mark 0 -j ACCEPT iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING ..... -j MARK --set-mark ..... iptables -t mangle -A

Hi folks, I have a strange situation. When I add branches to the tree, everything goes to the default class. The error might be obvious, but I cannot find it. I would really appreciate your help. this works, nothing goes to "1:9999": ############################################################################# /sbin/iptables -F -t mangle /sbin/tc qdisc del dev eth1 root >

http://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=747 Summary: IPtables marked packets not being inpsected in NAT table. Product: iptables Version: CVS (please indicate timestamp) Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P3 Component: iptables AssignedTo:

hi all At last i got sucess !.. but am confused y it didnt work earlier..the difference today was that i reinstalled RH7.2 & complied kernel 2.4.16(not 17).. rest was same..... & the bandwidth too is under control!.. is it normal for to get more than said bandwidth--i mean i restricted a network with 8Kbit(with same script as below) but still was able to get a download(ftp) of

Hello guys, I am still in doubt about this kind of server. So my question is about the "prio" at routing tables like: I have 3 tables in /etc/iproute2/rt_tables: 201 201 202 202 222 222 In table 201 there is the rules about my internet link (frame relay) that comes into eth0. So I made this route into it: [root@ns2 iproute2]# ip route show table 201 default via

Hi all, I''m trying to marking packets with iptables and use tc filter to catch this packets. I configure my device: tc qdisc del root dev eth0 tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: htb default 10 tc class add dev eth0 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 3000kbit ceil 6000kbit burst 15k tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:1 classid 1:10 htb rate 2000kbit ceil 4000kbit burst 15k tc qdisc add dev eth0

Hello, I have a LINUX server with two internet connections available. I want all the traffic to go over the default route, but HTTP traffic to go over ISP2 line. Interfaces: eth1 192.168.2.254 - LAN 192.168.2.x ppp0 x.x.x.106 - remote gateway x.x.x.6 - ISP1 (default route) eth0 192.168.164.254 - remote gateway 192.168.164.113 - ISP2 (a hardware router) I have the following configuration: echo

I have a network with around 40 /24 subnets that shares a common DSL, this cries out for shaping so here I am trying to make it work as my first tc project. I have managed to cargocult some snippets from this list and tried to come up with a config, but there are a few things that I''d really like some input on: 1) Are the NAT''ed addresses available in the PREROUTING table

The current thread on the User''s List entitled "Multi-ISP in 2.4.0" includes the following tcrules file: ############################################################################ ## #MARK SOURCE DEST PROTO PORT(S) CLIENT USER TEST # PORT(S) 201:P eth2 ppp1

Hi List, i have a realy strange problem with no solution yet, i''m using iproute together with the iptables mangle option, in a dmz network is a cisco pix present with another inet link behind, therefore i''m using the mangle option to split traffic on a protocol base like: iptables -A PREROUTING -t mangle -i eth1 -s 192.168.1.5 -p tcp --dport 80 -j MARK --set-mark 3 and add the

Hy, I would want to mark the packets that are entering in a machine, with a mark for using diffserv with DSMARK. My machine has 2 interfaces, a ethernet and a wireless. The ethernet interface is eth1 and the other is wifi0. Firs, I would want to test that I would be able to mark the tos of the paquets that I would be receiving, for this I write in the console of my linux: iptables -A

Happy New Year. Finally got my fw and tc rules down pat for the bridge, now interested in introducing a third nic to have nat on the box as well. Does anyone have a idea of a good place to start reading up on the subject, mainly interested in how to setup the flow direction to start with as to get a overall understanding of the flow, found that help best. Internet --- eth0 --- eth1 ---