similar to: per packet loadbalancing.

more messages in the other node of the cluster.../var/log/messages. ======== Jun 1 19:05:59 linux2 kernel: cdrom: open failed. Jun 1 19:05:59 linux2 kernel: cdrom: open failed. Jun 1 19:09:35 linux2 kernel: OCFS2 Node Manager 0.99.10-BETA14 Tue May 31 23:34:42 EDT 2005 (build 82257c19fee200eff2ba31569613b46a) Jun 1 19:09:35 linux2 kernel: OCFS2 DLM 0.99.10-BETA14 Tue May 31 23:34:43 EDT 2005

more messages in the other node of the cluster.../var/log/messages. ======== Jun 1 19:05:59 linux2 kernel: cdrom: open failed. Jun 1 19:05:59 linux2 kernel: cdrom: open failed. Jun 1 19:09:35 linux2 kernel: OCFS2 Node Manager 0.99.10-BETA14 Tue May 31 23:34:42 EDT 2005 (build 82257c19fee200eff2ba31569613b46a) Jun 1 19:09:35 linux2 kernel: OCFS2 DLM 0.99.10-BETA14 Tue May 31 23:34:43 EDT 2005

On my debian woody (kernel 2.4.31) the tcpdump doesn''t work with imq0 devices. If I try to tcpdump imq devices there is no packet seen: [...] rt1:~# tcpdump -n -i imq0 Warning: arptype 65535 not supported by libpcap - falling back to cooked socket tcpdump: WARNING: imq0: no IPv4 address assigned tcpdump: verbose output suppressed, use -v or -vv for full protocol decode listening on

I have noticed an inconsistency with the behavior of linux smbfs mounting a remote win2k server while a file is open for writing: 1) If a linux process opens a file that /doesn't exist/ on the win2k server, while the file is open, other machines trying to read the file give the usual 'Text file is busy' (linux) or 'file is in use by another process'

Dear friends, I have two Linux servers "Linux1" and Linux2" I like to mount a folder of Linux2 on Linux1 Whenever I try to mount the folder with #mount -t smbfs //Linux2/myshare /otherpc #password I give the root password and also tried other users password It gives following error: 8450: session setup failed : ERRSRV - ERRbadpw (Bad Password - name/ password pair in a Tree

First of all i wanna thanks Christoph Simon for the support. Only after his reply to my email i could see the real solution to the problem (Valeu mesmo cara... me ajudou pra caramba! Fico te devendo essa!) :) Here is what i learned in a month of research: I tried A LOT of things to do load balance, including the one at LARTC homepage. The only tutorial that REALLY works in my case is the

I have two internet lines and I want to do equal cost loadbalancing on the two uplinks to the internet. This is what I do: ip route add 200.200.200.0/24 dev eth2 table 200 ip route add default via 200.200.200.254 dev eth2 table 200 ip route add 100.100.100.0/24 dev eth1 table 100 ip route add default via 100.100.100.254 dev eth1 table 100 ip route add 200.200.200.0/24 src 200.200.200.1 dev eth2

With 2.4.28 and Julian Anastasov''s http://www.ssi.bg/~ja/routes-2.4.27-9.diff patch, I get the following when I attempt to build my kernel. Any ideas? Thanks! gcc -D__KERNEL__ -I/usr/src/linux/include -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wno-trigraphs -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -fno-common -fomit-frame-pointer -pipe -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 -march=i686 -fno-unit-at-a-time -nostdinc

Hi All, I'm trying to reproduce a failure on llvm-ppc64-linux1 (http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/llvm-ppc64-linux1/builds/5382) and llvm-ppc64-linux2 builders caused by one of my patches yesterday. Some of the CodeGen/Hexagon tests failed to compile with stack dump problem. I tried to configure and build LLVM for PowerPC on my machine locally but don't see the failures. I had to remove

After many many hours of frustration and failures I''m almost to the point that I don''t think this is even currently possible with Linux. With out going in to too much detail, I am effectively wanting to do the following. I want to be able to take traffic in from a local LAN on eth0 and route it out eth1 to a default gateway with a static IP. I want said default gateway

Hi there, I got the solution for my problem, and thought may at someday somebody could use it. Julian Anastasov and some people from the LVS mailing list helped me with it. --- Subject: Re: LVS and CBQ Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2000 22:53:01 +0000 (GMT) From: Julian Anastasov <ja@ssi.bg> To: joern maier <joern.maier@informatik.uni-ulm.de> CC:

I was able to get the source code for ocfs2 and compile it. This worked and created the necessary .ko files Now I have to figure out why gnu parted 1.6.15 has bugs. when I try a partprobe on a partitioned firewire maxtor drive mount -t ocfs2 /dev/sdb1 /u01/oradata/orcl It says no such device.... Any ideas anyone?... Regards, Mandar Vengurlekar ----- Original Message ----- From: Mandar P

I have 2 ADSL ad1 and ad2 , one PC for my firewall and some deamon on it with 3 ethernet : eth0 connect to my LAN ( 192.168.60.0/24 ) and 2 other connect to ad1 and ad2 |eth1 (10.0.1.2)--------------------ad1 ( ADSL 1 ) | My LAN(192.168.60.0/24) |---------eth0( 192.168.60.2)--> PC | |eth2 (10.0.2.2)---------------------ad2 (ADSL 2 ) All computer in LAN has default router =

Hello! No, the first DC was a migration of a Win Server 2003, and the second DC Samba only. Yes, but already I posted the smb new post. smb.conf # Global parameters [global] workgroup = SERVERAD realm = mydomain netbios name = DC-LINUX1 (and DC-LINUX2) server role = active directory domain controller passdb backend = samba_dsdb server services = s3fs, rpc, nbt, wrepl, ldap, CLDAP, kdc, drepl,

I am getting this message when trying to access Samba shares on a linux system. I have 2 linux computers and one Win XP system. I can see/access/read/write on all the WinXP shares from all systems. I can only access the Linux shares on the local system, that is linux1 can see it's own Samba shares, but can't see or access the shares on linux2. the reverse is true for linux2 as well. I am

Hello, I have finished setting up the load balancer with IPROUTE ... also patch the kernel to support DGD and now it''s working fine with the valuable guide at LARTC website, Julian Anastasov, and the kind people in this mailing list. Now I would like to launch a web server and a ftp server to the public but I''m stuck into a problem and really need your help. Currently internal

Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at gmail.com> wrote: > I've been working to revive the PPC64 build bots, and succeeded, but > not for the right reasons. There were still bootstrap assertion > failures and other pretty blatant errors. Then we figured out why: > the Clang bootstrapping build bots for Power7 are not actually > running any of the Clang tests! > > Could one

hi for those who was fallowing this topic I can say that IP_ROUTE_MULTIPATH_CACHED must be disabled! After few tests I''m quite sure that this was cousing my problems. Now I''m using 2.5.15 kernel without patch of Julian Anastasov and load-balancing is working. lartc split-access how to and http://www.ssi.bg/~ja/nano.txt now both are working fine Now I will try to use fwmark

Hi all, I have implemented load balancing using the tutorial http://www.ssi.bg/~ja/nano.txt ..The traffic is going through both my external network interface. I have some questions regarding this: ip route add default table 222 proto static \ nexthop via GWE1 dev IFE1 \ nexthop via GWE2 dev IFE2 The author explains the kernel chooses both the interfaces alternately (weight being 1

Hello, On Mon, 17 May 2004, Charles-Etienne.Dube wrote: > I did some tests with 2 cable modems, but now it is installed in a production > environment with 4 cable modems. At first, everything seemed to work fine.. > But now I had a couple of users tell me that some web pages were > not available while others were, and it semms to be a masquerading problem > since when I