similar to: gre/ipsec loadbalancing

Hi, I have the following setup. Two linux systems with two [test] external interfaces encrypted with ipsec [transport]. Two gre tunnels that pass 10.200.0.0/24 and 10.200.1.0/24 network traffic. Testing the balanced tunnels I would setup iptraf on one and ping from the other. The results would be as expected; traffic would be split between the two interfaces. Testing with an ftp transfer of

Hi, I have the following setup. Two linux systems with two [test] external interfaces encrypted with ipsec [transport]. Two gre tunnels that pass 10.200.0.0/24 and 10.200.1.0/24 network traffic. Testing the balanced tunnels I would setup iptraf on one and ping from the other. The results would be as expected; traffic would be split between the two interfaces. Testing with an ftp transfer of

Hi, I am tring to us ip route to load balance between two interfaces. ip route add equalize 10.200.1.0/24 nexthop via 10.200.0.2 dev neta nexthop via 10.200.0.2 dev neta2 Where neta and neta2 are gre tunnels. Testing show that packets travel in a single sided manner. Do I need to use the multipath (IP_ROUTE_MULTIPATH_CACHED) module? thx jason

Hi, I have a problem with GRE tunneling. I read Advanced-Routing HOWTO about this and I did all as is written in this documentation. Even the same example is here which I need for my project. I want create (by means of GRE tunneling or IP in IP tunneling) virtual private network VPN - in first phase without IPsec in other phase with IPsec. I have two local networks distant apart with two routers.

Hello everyone, I have a problem regarding gre tunneling, I have two linux box both of them has a private network and the linux A is connected to the internet via wireless radio and the other linux B is connected to the internet via lease line. Here is the setup of my two linux box Linux A eth0 = 203.189.x.1 (internet) eth1 = 192.168.1.1 (going to hub private network) Linux B eth0 = 205.198.x.1

Hi, I have a client connected to the ''net through 3 ISP''s. Have set up a Linux box to do routing and load sharing for the 3 connections. A fourth interface is connected to the LAN with private IP addresses. Am using iptables to SNAT traffic to the appropriate IP depending on the interface the packet gets routed onto. The setup looks something like this: Interface IP

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi all, I've got this strange thing: I setup a openvpn link between two openwrts. NetA: 192.168.2.0/24 NetB: 192.168.0.0/24 In netA there is a mail server + DNS: 192.168.2.44, with domain name branch.abc.com In netB there is a mail server + DNS: 192.168.0.44, with domain name abc.com I setup both DNS server to be a slave server of each other

Martin, If I understand whay you are suggesting, there is a problem in your design: It will only work if you use Hide NAT. The problem is that the ip_src == IP0 rule is wrong: The ip_src is not changed by the router and it is not equal to the IP of any of the machine interfaces. Can you think of a solution that will work in the following reasonabl scenario: Lets say I have two T1 internet

I need to send multicast traffic through a GRE tunnel between two Linux routers. The tunnel works for normal IP packets, but I can''t see how to make it work for multicast. Here''s the setup: 10.10.10.0/24 LAN-B--------------RtrB-------------RtrC--------------LAN-C 192.168.2.0/24 192.168.1.0/24 RtrB interfaces: eth0

hi all, We are using squid 25s1 with kernel 2.4.19 and iproute2(+julian''s Pathes) with the following acl.. acl short_path dst 128.0.0.0/8 tcp_outgoing_address myIp2nd short_path we are linked to 2 isp--one having satelite & the other OFC. We want the above mentioned network to go thru OFC(ispB) as the sibling resides there. But when i use squidclient mgr:server_list

Hi, One of my users is having this problem. He saved an MS Excel file on the UNIX disk and he always experienced cannot write to the file even if it is his file. I am not sure if this is the SAMBA problem or the NT problem(we are using Windows Terminal Server Edition). Sometimes, he experiences these message "cannot open read only file" or "this file is opened by administrator,

The 3.1 Beta is now available -- check the Shorewall home page. -- Tom Eastep \ Shorewall - iptables made easy AIM: tmeastep \ http://www.shorewall.net ICQ: #60745924 \ teastep@shorewall.net

I have gotten Samba to work but them came up with a problem. It is working on a mchine with the class C address 198.xxx.xxx.xxx. Any PC's with that on that IP address can see the server just fine. However, we also have another class C 207.xxx.xxx.xxx and folks on that one cannot see the server. We have seen this problem before and NetBeui solved that one. Any ideas? Thanks in advance.

Hola de nuevo R-Users, me he dejado cosas para aclara. Primero de todo tengo cinco repeticiones y 20 missings, así que mi n es de 5×10×3×5-20= 730 datos en total, todos los grupos tienen al menos 3 representantes. Segundo: Las variables estudiadas son Producción neta, Peso de 100 semillas y Proteína. Tercero: Observo los mismos genotipos (G) en varios años (A) en las misma localidades

Two legged 1.4.2 firewall zone nwl is eth0 (192.168.221.0/24 ($FW on .205)) zone jvc is eth1 (10.200.47.0/24 ($FW on .253)) Lets suppose i need to allow traffic from nwl to "jvn" which is 10.200.0.0/16 (yes, i do realize that they overlap) and route that traffic to 10.200.47.254? The router upstream from this one routes 10.200.0.0/16 -> 192.168.221.205 and i do see

How do i unsubscribe??

I have the following scheme: ------------- ------------- | router | eth0 ------------------ eth0 | router | | linux 1 | | linux 2 | | | eth1 ------------------ eth1 | | ------------- ------------- I''d like to do per packet loadbalancing on linux1 and

Hi, We have two internet connections and I would like to loadbalance between the two using advanced routing. The gateway machine to my lan has two interfaces, one connected to lan(eth0) and other to wan (eth1). The wan side interface is connected to a switch which is terminated with two internet connections from two ISPs. I have added the routes as follows, ip route add default scope

Hi folks, I've just been reading about the above command and wonder if anyone has made use of it for load-balancing or if doing so would be completely inappropriate!? I'm thinking of the scenario where there are a number of Asterisk gateways and incoming SIP traffic. From what I've read, with a box in front receiving all incoming traffic the SIPRedirect command could be used to

Hi~ My linux box(kernel 2.4.13; used for NAT) have 3 NICs, two of them are for ADSL(I have two adsl line) and the last is for private network. My ISP doesn''t support multilink. In this situation, How can I use both ppp lines for the internet(load shareing or balancing)? Thanks. Lee.