similar to: WRR and Monitoring/Graphing usage

Guys I''m looking for some advice on the following situation: We''re serving a residential complex with internet, the network has grown and with it has the problems, below is a descriptive layout of our current setup: Connection: ADSL Down/Up speed: 512kbps/256kbps (1024kbps/256kbps in the near future) 2.0GHz Celeron D with 512MB RAM Current users: 140 Maximum amount of users:

Hi all, Here''s the situation. I have 80 users sharing a internet link of 5Mb link. The users are grouped in /29 ip addr classes so I have 10 classes of users I want to create a root htb, then 10 htb childs each with 0.5Mb bandwidth. The traffic will be directed to each class using tc filters. Now, I want that each of 8 users from each class to share equally the class bandwidth. Can I

Guys Reading through my lartc mail, and thinking on how to tackle my next shaping solution, gave me an idea. I''d like to propose this idea for scrutiny and if it sounds viable I''ll definitely need to start developing in due time. For me in my day to day work with developing network application specifically geared for middle-tier ISP''s, and reading on other peoples

Hi all, I need to provide shell hosting for about 40 users, and few days ago I found the wondershaper script, so Im trying to know if this script could help me to improve interactive ssh/telnet connections. Wondershaper could help me or its only efective on OUTGOINGS requests? Ok, any comment and feedback will be welcome. Sorry for my bad english and THANKS in advance.

Dear members, I am trying to share the bandwith for all users fairly. because some users heavily uses p2p programs and a few hosts consume most of bandwith. when we limit each flow it does not work as one client has many connection at same time. Firstly I tried to write a script that use the ipfm(which accounts traffic usage) logs as follow .extract ip addresses heavy bandwith users from

Guys Given the replies and interests lately on the WRR scheduler, and the shameless promotion of Route Hat (only kidding), my question is simple. Is there an alternative for the 2.6.x kernels? >From what I gather WRR is only available for the 2.4 kernels... Regards -- Kenneth Kalmer kenneth.kalmer@gmail.com http://opensourcery.blogspot.com

Guys Considering the festive season is upon us, thanks to everyone contributing to the list and helping all the readers with your great input! I don''t want to mention names, I''ll most certainly leave someone out. With this mail I''d like to test some theory on bandwidth management, with my own successes and failures during the past year. Sharing a link between 200

Hi If I have a HTB class with 128kbit, and I want to put "N" users in that class ( in order to share bandwidth fairly ) , which is better for me ? esfq (hash dst) or wrr ? I would attach esfq or wrr to HTB parent class. Also I''ve readed on Jim script that over WRR put a RED qdisc, but I don''t understand it. bests andres

Guys All the recent discussions recently, and the knowledge of a 2.6 port, of WRR has made me very keen on trying it. I had a look at the docs and examples know but my mind is not in a very receptive state. Take this simple example. Incoming internet connection of 1mbps. Shared between up to 25 users simultaneously. I know that WRR can fairly distribute the traffic amongst the currently

Hello, I am new to R. I often collect data at multiple sites and need to create separate graphs (such as scatterplots or histograms) of specific variables for each site. I have tried to do this by splitting the data frame and then using lapply, but it seems that the graphing commands cannot be called as functions. Here is a sample of my data, called "seeddist2": site

For some time now im trying to get to know what causes such configuration of QOS (kernel 2.4.25-2.4.28 + IMQ patch and ofcourse wrr): -- WRR_MAX_CLASSES=200 DEV_IN=imq0 ifconfig $DEV_IN down ifconfig $DEV_IN up tc qdisc add dev ${DEV_IN} handle 1:0 root htb default 10 tc class add dev ${DEV_IN} parent 1:0 classid 1:10 htb rate 1000kbit burst 1kbit prio 1 tc qdisc add dev ${DEV_IN} parent 1:10

I have set up wrr successfully on my bridge/shaper machine. That much works fine. I originally used sfq in the inner classes. However, there was a problem with high-bandwidth connections (web downloads, bittorrent) starving low-bandwidth low-latency connections like ssh. I would like to use prio or similar to prioritize the interactive traffic, but it does not seem to work. I have tested with

Hello I have problem with wrr and more than 1300 classes when i try to add qdisc like: tc qdisc add dev imq1 parent 1:21 handle 1000: wrr dest ip 1512 0 then i have a message like: RTNETLINK answers: Cannot allocate memory And some other problem: When I do more than 2048 filters I have message like: Classes: tc class add dev imq1 parent 1:1 classid 1:9 htb rate 1024kbit ceil 2048kbit .. tc

Could anyone explain what is WRR param2 [wmode2 , incr2 , decr2 , min2] for ? can i set just the param1 ? [wmode1 , incr1 , decr1,min1] -- []''s Salatiel "O maior prazer do inteligente é bancar o idiota diante de um idiota que banca o inteligente".

Guys Oppologies for the cross post. I''ve been scouring the docs coming with the wrr patches and for the life of me I can''t figure out why there are 8 parameters for each class. <snip> weight1, min1, decr1, incr1, weight2, min2, decr2, incr2 </snip> According to the docs these parameters are handled the same way, but looking at the example scripts there are

Attaching WRR to a hfsc ot htb class after a while i will get all packets drop and syslog full of HFSC or HTB : Non-work-conserving qdisc any ideas ? -- []''s Salatiel "O maior prazer do inteligente é bancar o idiota diante de um idiota que banca o inteligente".

is possible to setup any bandwith resource control in a ppp0 interface? i''d like to distribute bandwith equally between pcs in a network, and inside each pc, equally between protocols... is this possible? all the documentation refers to eth0 type interfaces... so? -- $~ who | grep -i brunette | date ; cd ~ ; unzip ; touch; strip; finger; mount; gasp; yes; uptime ; umount; sleep Diego

Hi folks. This message may be a bit verbose and not as techie as the ones I''ve seen in this list, but describing the scenario will save a lot of messages. Scenario: A building with 17 floors, each floor with 24 offices (totals 408 offices) connected to the backbone through a border switch (1 vlan for each office). The offices can lease bandwidth of 64k, 128k, 256k, 512k, 1M and 2Mbps,

Hello, I have one Q. What is better when using as leaf in one leaf with several hosts (like subnet) to splice traffic equaly to user number? Like 2 users = 256/2, 3 = 256/3 and so on. WRR was pretty good for this job, but it''s only for 2.4.21 kernels and mine''s 2.4.22. So what is better: SFQ or TBF? -- Artūras Šlajus _______________________________________________

Hi all, updated py-htbstat: http://www2.ldc.net/~dor/py-htbstat/ Some screenshots: http://www2.ldc.net/~dor/py-htbstat/shots/shots.html It''s now possible to use classids in form ''xxxx:xxxx'' now (actually i dont know why i''ve made it to use ''1:xxxx'' only :-) -- _,-=._ /|_/| `-.} `=._,.-=-._., @ @._, `._ _,-.