similar to: share bandwith fairly

Hi all, I need to provide shell hosting for about 40 users, and few days ago I found the wondershaper script, so Im trying to know if this script could help me to improve interactive ssh/telnet connections. Wondershaper could help me or its only efective on OUTGOINGS requests? Ok, any comment and feedback will be welcome. Sorry for my bad english and THANKS in advance.

Guys Reading through my lartc mail, and thinking on how to tackle my next shaping solution, gave me an idea. I''d like to propose this idea for scrutiny and if it sounds viable I''ll definitely need to start developing in due time. For me in my day to day work with developing network application specifically geared for middle-tier ISP''s, and reading on other peoples

Guys I''m looking for some advice on the following situation: We''re serving a residential complex with internet, the network has grown and with it has the problems, below is a descriptive layout of our current setup: Connection: ADSL Down/Up speed: 512kbps/256kbps (1024kbps/256kbps in the near future) 2.0GHz Celeron D with 512MB RAM Current users: 140 Maximum amount of users:

Guys Considering the festive season is upon us, thanks to everyone contributing to the list and helping all the readers with your great input! I don''t want to mention names, I''ll most certainly leave someone out. With this mail I''d like to test some theory on bandwidth management, with my own successes and failures during the past year. Sharing a link between 200

Hi all, Here''s the situation. I have 80 users sharing a internet link of 5Mb link. The users are grouped in /29 ip addr classes so I have 10 classes of users I want to create a root htb, then 10 htb childs each with 0.5Mb bandwidth. The traffic will be directed to each class using tc filters. Now, I want that each of 8 users from each class to share equally the class bandwidth. Can I

Hi All, I''ve just installed WRR and am looking at tools to monitor, graph and display the system and throughput of each queue/class/filter. I''ve looked at: iptraf - only shows tcp/udp flows, not QOS queue throughputs show.pl - doesnt work with WRR (as far as I can tell) tc-graph.pl - doesnt work with WRR (as far as I can tell) polltc_ - doesnt work with WRR (as far as I can

is possible to setup any bandwith resource control in a ppp0 interface? i''d like to distribute bandwith equally between pcs in a network, and inside each pc, equally between protocols... is this possible? all the documentation refers to eth0 type interfaces... so? -- $~ who | grep -i brunette | date ; cd ~ ; unzip ; touch; strip; finger; mount; gasp; yes; uptime ; umount; sleep Diego

Hi everybody. I have a dilema and I think you guys can help me out. I am trying to shape the bandwith for about 500 clients, and I want the bandwith to be alocated dynamicly. Lets say I have 4 MB bandwith. I give each ip (500 IP''s) a sustained rate of 4 KB/sec . I wonder if I can shape the bandwith so when for example only 100 clients are online, to give them a rate of 4MB/100. How can

Hi folks. This message may be a bit verbose and not as techie as the ones I''ve seen in this list, but describing the scenario will save a lot of messages. Scenario: A building with 17 floors, each floor with 24 offices (totals 408 offices) connected to the backbone through a border switch (1 vlan for each office). The offices can lease bandwidth of 64k, 128k, 256k, 512k, 1M and 2Mbps,

Hi all, I have installed the recommended installs from here: http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/RebuildSRPM I want to build a "ipfm" RPM on a CentOS 6.2, for legacy purpose. I cant immediately get rid of that piece of software, but we're on the move... So: $ wget http://rpm.pbone.net/index.php3/stat/3/srodzaj/2/search/ipfm-0.11.5-alt1.src.rpm $ rpm -i --nomd5

Hi all, When trying to rpmbuild http://robert.cheramy.net/ipfm/browser/trunk/redhat/ipfm.spec, I do this: [mihamina at centos6-01 redhat]$ rpmbuild -ba ipfm.spec error: line 5: Unknown tag: Licence: GPL And I get the error above. [mihamina at centos6-01 redhat]$ head -n 5 ipfm.spec Summary: IP Flow Meter is a bandwidth analysis tool Name: ipfm Version: 0.12.0rc1 Release:

Hello, I have one Q. What is better when using as leaf in one leaf with several hosts (like subnet) to splice traffic equaly to user number? Like 2 users = 256/2, 3 = 256/3 and so on. WRR was pretty good for this job, but it''s only for 2.4.21 kernels and mine''s 2.4.22. So what is better: SFQ or TBF? -- Artūras Šlajus _______________________________________________

Sir, Kindly excuse me. I am a newbie to LARTC.. I am a small ISP in rural India distributing 1 MB link to 200 people. I have been using rshaper by Alessandro Rubini for shaping. http://freshmeat.net/projects/rshaper/ My kernel is Linux version 2.4.22-1.2115.nptl( Fedora Core 1) Rshaper is very good in controlling incoming bandwidth (from LAN) I use Squid also on this Linux Box.. Right

Hi, How can I set equal bandwidth of 512kbit downlink and 256kbit uplink for every single IP address of 254 IP addresses I have in my LAN? Regards, ro0ot

Hello, I am new to R. I often collect data at multiple sites and need to create separate graphs (such as scatterplots or histograms) of specific variables for each site. I have tried to do this by splitting the data frame and then using lapply, but it seems that the graphing commands cannot be called as functions. Here is a sample of my data, called "seeddist2": site

Guys All the recent discussions recently, and the knowledge of a 2.6 port, of WRR has made me very keen on trying it. I had a look at the docs and examples know but my mind is not in a very receptive state. Take this simple example. Incoming internet connection of 1mbps. Shared between up to 25 users simultaneously. I know that WRR can fairly distribute the traffic amongst the currently

Guys Given the replies and interests lately on the WRR scheduler, and the shameless promotion of Route Hat (only kidding), my question is simple. Is there an alternative for the 2.6.x kernels? >From what I gather WRR is only available for the 2.4 kernels... Regards -- Kenneth Kalmer kenneth.kalmer@gmail.com http://opensourcery.blogspot.com

Hi If I have a HTB class with 128kbit, and I want to put "N" users in that class ( in order to share bandwidth fairly ) , which is better for me ? esfq (hash dst) or wrr ? I would attach esfq or wrr to HTB parent class. Also I''ve readed on Jim script that over WRR put a RED qdisc, but I don''t understand it. bests andres

Hello, I want to ask what am I doing wrong. A few seconds after running this script my gateway freezes. I use the 2.4.1 kernel compiled on RH 7.0 system using the kgcc (egcs-1.1.2) compiler. I have two ethernet cards. The Internet interface eth1 is connected to the ISP, who shapes out traffic to 128Kbit. I would like to give the high priority to the e-mail and ssh traffic and to shape others

> From: "CIT/Paul" <xerox@foonet.net> > Any help would be greatly appreciated :) This is much better than SFQ :> Sounds like SFQ to me. Can you tell us what the differences are?