similar to: Redundant firewall

Hi, Does OCFS require NAS hardware to run or does normal PC hard disk work? Thanks, Pete -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://oss.oracle.com/pipermail/ocfs2-users/attachments/20081219/1bc9110b/attachment.html

Hi, in my lan I have two firewall, fw1 is the first and manage inte-vlan routing. Fw2 manage internet and dmz. fw1 and fw2 have an interface (eth4 for both fw2 and fw1) on the same subnet that permit to the host behind fw1 to reach internet, my problem is on fw2: eth4 is the NIC that connect fw2 and fw1, I would''t like masquerading hosts behind fw1, so to eth4 of fw2 arrive all

Hello everybody: Here is my "network layout": ISP1 ISP2 | | | | +-----eth0---------eth1------+ | | | FC 3 box | | | +-----eth2---------eth3------+ |

My mission is to get one * box to dial another * box' extensions. I have set this up previously without any issues by making a simple IAX trunk/extension pair on the two boxes and create a dial plan with a prefix like 9|XXX to select an extension on the other box. My problem is that I now have to do this with extremely restrictive firewalls thrown into the mix - firewalls I have no control

I don't get this. I am using a freshly installed copy of Fedora 19 and starting up glusterd for the first time. The goal is to have a replicated directory on two systems. But for right now, I can't even start up the glusterd daemon right out of the box. Trying to follow the Quick Start directions at http://gluster.org/community/documentation/index.php/QuickStart is, well, challenging.

An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://supercolony.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20120304/04099724/attachment.html>

Hi, I have a simple question. I have my firewall with 2 external Ip and 1 lan. For example ISP1 FW LAN----Mail Server ISP2 Ok, when i DANT the smpt port to my mail server, I can see that the conection in my mail server comes from the external IP of my ISP. I need to change this so the conection to my mail server cames from the LAN IP from my firewall Is this possible?

Greetings, There are 2 imminent releases coming soon to a download server near you: 1. GlusterFS 3.2.6 - a maintenance release that fixes some bugs. 2. GlusterFS 3.3 beta 3 - the next iteration of the exciting new hotness that will be 3.3 You can find both of these in the "QA builds" server: http://bits.gluster.com/pub/gluster/glusterfs/ There are source tarballs and binary RPMs

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I have a machine running 2.6.18-rc3 with a bridge config that looks like this: cr1:~# brctl show bridge name bridge id STP enabled interfaces vlan100 36b0.0007e90f40c1 yes eth0.100 eth2.100 vlan101 5dc0.0007e90f40c1 yes

Hi to all, +-------+ eth1 +-------+ | |==========| | ''network 1'' ----| A | | B |---- ''network 2'' | |==========| | +-------+ eth2 +-------+ A and B are routers # tc qdisc add dev eth1 root teql0 # tc qdisc add dev eth2 root teql0 # ip link set

Hi, I have an DNAT ISSUE with PREROUTING. This is my setup. I have 2 firewalls running iptables. Pls asume 1.2.3.4/29 is the internet interace of FIRST firewall. 2.3.4.5/29 is the internet interface of SECOND firewall. it has DMZ zone. in that DMZ zone, mail server runnig @ 192.168.100.3 Now I want to DNAT port 25 of FISRT firewall ( i.e - its ip address - 1.2.3.4/29) to the internet ip

Hi Everyone, In my HVM guest''s config file, I have given my guest 3 interface. I have called them fw1, fw2 and fw3. I have joined each interface to a bridge on the Dom0. This does appear when I do a "brctl show". However, there are 3 other interfaces also added called tapx.0,tapx.1 and tapx.2 (Where x is the domain ID for the guest). Furthermore, I am only able to run

Hi, I am migrating from one ISP to another, and would like to run both simultaneously for a while. So: (both netmask 255.255.255.248) [ISP1] 24.106.62.180 [ISP2] 209.181.237.230 | | | | \ / -----[ HUB ]----- | | -------- eth0 --------- | Linux FW/Server | ---------eth1 --------- | | [ HUB ] | 10.0.0.x/255.255.255.0 The default IP on

Hi All, 3.4.0 and 3.3.2 releases of GlusterFS are now available. GlusterFS 3.4.0 can be downloaded from [1] and release notes are available at [2]. Upgrade instructions can be found at [3]. If you would like to propose bug fix candidates or minor features for inclusion in 3.4.1, please add them at [4]. 3.3.2 packages can be downloaded from [5]. A big note of thanks to everyone who helped in

Hello List: Recently our shorewall FW server went dead (PS failure) & brought the entire system down. Luckily we are testing the FW and other servers, so we did not loose anything. Now we have decided to setup two Shorewall FW servers with a primary & another fallover FW server. I have done some research cruised the Internet and found that a product ''UCARP''

I know I can dial multiple channels in sequence exten => 101,1,Dial(SIP/101,10) exten => 101,2,Dial(SIP/102,10) extne => 101,3,Dial(Zap/1/5551212) What the boss would really like is to be able to ring 2 lines simultaneously. exten => 101,Dial(Sip/101,10) && Dial(Sip/102,10) so that both extensions ring at the same time... mostly so that he can have the remote phone at his

Some of the Red Hat Enterprise Linux servers in our environment sometimes get assigned virtual IP addresses (eth0:1, eth0:2, etc). Puppet Dashboard''s parameters seem like an ideal way to define and provision virtual IPs on these servers. One could create a "vip1" parameter on a node, and define a value of the IP address to use for that vip. A manifest could then be written to

Are virtual IPs supported on eth interfaces in domU(s)? Thanks _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

Hello everyone! I am working on implementing my first Gluster/Ganesha NFS setup and I am flowing this guide: http://blog.gluster.org/2015/10/linux-scale-out-nfsv4-using-nfs-ganesha-and-glusterfs-one-step-at-a-time Everything is working fine. I've got Gluster and Ganesha NFS working and I have VIPs on each node and it is failing over fine, if a little slowly. However, the VIPs don't

I've been using NuFone with Asterisk for a while, but I've started seeing this error with incoming calls: NOTICE[114696]: File chan_iax2.c, Line 4581 (socket_read): Rejected connect attempt from 216.234.116.189, requested/capability 0x4/0x4 incompatible with our capability 0xff03. Outgoing works just fine, but I can't get incoming to work at all. Any ideas? I googled for the