Displaying 20 results from an estimated 200 matches similar to: "rule fwmark desn''t work for local packets (output chain)"
2006 Mar 28
13
Load-banancing. two ip''s from one isp
--------------eth0---80.48.56.70---------- -------------80.48.56.65 ISP
| my | router1
| |
| linux |
| | router2
------------eth1---192.168.200.10----- ----------------192.168.1.1 ISP
I''ve two ip from my isp one public and one internal. ISP have two routers router1 is gw for public ip and router2 is gw for internal
2001 Feb 05
2
Could not find working SSLeay?
I'm installing openssl 0.9.5a and openssh 2.3.0p1 on an Ultra 5 running
Solaris 8 with the latest cluster patch. Openssl installed without any
problems. When I do a configure for openssh I get:
Checking for OpenSSL directory. . . configure: error: Could not find
working SSLeay /
OpenSSL libraries, please install
I've reinstalled openssl and everything is there. As a note I've
2010 Nov 04
0
certdnsnames question
Hi All
Apologies if this is obvious, but I''m a bit flaky around SSL certificates.
NB puppet version 0.25.5
We use the brilliant feature of certificates where you can have Alternate
DNS names for a certificate which is manifested in the puppet master config
file as certdnsnames. All our clients connect to puppet-$
location.example.com, and if $location is down, we can point the CNAME to
2006 Mar 29
3
Re: Load-banancing. two ip''s from one isp - solution
hi for those who was fallowing this topic I can say that
IP_ROUTE_MULTIPATH_CACHED must be disabled! After few tests I''m quite sure that this was cousing my problems. Now I''m using 2.5.15 kernel without patch of Julian Anastasov and load-balancing is working.
lartc split-access how to and http://www.ssi.bg/~ja/nano.txt now both are working fine
Now I will try to use fwmark
2004 Jul 13
5
WiSIP and Zyxel Prestige 2000W
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
Anyone have any experience with either of these, I 'd appreciate some
feedback? Plus it seems pretty easy to steal a connection with this.
Zyxel Prestige 2000W
WiSIP
thanks,
- --
Steve
"They that would give up essential liberty for temporary safety deserve
neither liberty nor safety."
Benjamin
2000 Dec 08
0
Slow connects
I've just installed openssh 2.3.0p1 on a number of Solaris 2.6 boxes. I've
noticed that connect times can take up to 3 minutes when connecting from
box a to box b with the new ssh client and daemon. When I connect using a
pc client like f-secure or with an old ssh client on unix the connect times
are wonderfully fast. Any idea why I would get slow connect times with the
new client and
2004 Nov 29
0
Compile problem on Solaris 8
We are trying to get samba comiled with ldap support on Solaris 8. We're
compiling version 3.0.9 with gcc 3.3. Here's the error that we get:
Using FLAGS = -O -I./popt -Iinclude
-I/nau/src/Net/samba-3.0.9/source/include
-I/nau/src/Net/samba-3.0.9/source/ubiqx
-I/nau/src/Net/samba-3.0.9/source/smbwrapper -I. -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE
-D_REENTRANT -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64
2018 Jul 09
0
Parametrized Vignettest in R packages
Dear Duncan,
Was close to giving up to use the parameterized rmarkown as vignettes.
But your suggestions to use quote and eval, as well as to use the
package parameter in data
made it work, with all devtools::install,check,build and
build_vignettes as well as with R CMD ... etc.
But most importantly it also still works with:
rmarkdown::render("vignettes/tr_srm_summary.Rmd",
2006 Mar 14
1
Problems compiling on Solaris 8
I have two machines that we are having problems compiling version 4.3p2.
Both machines are Solaris 8 and gcc 3.3.2 openssl 0.9.8a is installed on
both machines as well.
The first exhibits an error in log.h:
In file included from bsd-arc4random.c:18:
../log.h: In function `fatal':
../log.h:56: warning: empty declaration
../log.h:65: error: parse error before "volatile"
2003 Sep 18
0
hexadecimal fwmark and fwmark mask
Hi list,
I''m new to this list, I just subscribed because I have some ackward
about IPRoute2.
First, while playing with NetFilter'' "MARK" target, I met a weird
behaviour once I tried to use this marks in the RPDB : the packets
where successfully marked, but it seemed that RPDB didn''t succed in
matching them (for those who already know the answer, I only used
2013 Aug 29
4
[PATCH] Notify caching_thread()s to give up on extent_commit_sem when needed.
caching_thread()s do all their work under read access to extent_commit_sem.
They give up on this read access only when need_resched() tells them, or
when they exit. As a result, somebody that wants a WRITE access to this sem,
might wait for a long time. Especially this is problematic in
cache_block_group(),
which can be called on critical paths like find_free_extent() and in commit
path via
2006 Nov 02
0
src routing and fwmark
Hi,
I''ve got 2 lines from two diffrent ISP''s, one is a leased line and another a
DSL line,
I route certain ips over the DSL line for faster access and would like
email to go over the leased line as it has a static ip and is our sending
mailserver ip
I would like to send mail to the same ips that is routed over DSL via the
leased line, otherwise my server gets blacklisted with
2006 Jul 29
1
FWMark routing trouble
Hi everybody,
I''m trying to set up routing for 2 links to the internet on a box which
produces traffic itself (e.g. DNS) and will route all our local
traffic.
AS one route is quick and expensive and the other one slow and cheap, I
want to be able to route packets for some high-level protocols to the
second link.
If I correctly understood table 3-2 in
2006 Jun 14
1
fwmark filter doesn''t work as expected
Hello!
Currently I am marking packets with IPMARK, and then using following rules:
1: class add dev eth0 parent 1:4 classid 1:100a htb rate $rate ceil
$ceil quantum 1600
2: qdisc add dev eth0 parent 1:100a handle 100a:0 sfq perturb 10
3: filter add dev eth0 protocol ip parent 1:0 pref 30 handle 4106 fw
classid 1:100a
4: class add dev eth1 parent 1:2 classid 1:100a htb rate $rate ceil
$ceil
2006 Feb 06
0
ip rule, fwmark, mangle and src IP
I made a script to test if in a moultiple gateway setup all default
connection are up, regardless of the fact that that gateway is the default
gw.
Suppose adsl1 and adsl2 are present, and all traffic goes by default to
adsl1, and you want to test if adsl2 is ok.
1. I use mangles from iptables to mark icmp packets to some test machines
2. I set up a routing table for each adsl
3. I use
2005 Oct 30
0
FWMARK ROUTING OVER MULTIPLE ROUTERS/LANS
I would like to route ssh in my network via DSL2 and all other trafic via
DSL1.
So far I menaged to do it for LAN2 but there are still WLAN1,LAN3 and LAN1 to
go.
On all routers I added table "pilicka" with rule for fwmark and I fwmarked
ssh.
# ip rule show
0: from all lookup local
32765: from all fwmark 0x3 lookup pilicka
32766: from all lookup main
32767: from all lookup
2005 Nov 29
0
fwmark port - dual adsl line
Hi all,
Below is my network diagram: -
eth0 (adsl 1) eth1 (adsl 2)
| |
| |
| |
| |
-----------------
| |
| Gateway |
| |
-----------------
|
|
|
tun0
Below is my iptables scripting to mark certain ports:
-
2005 Jul 01
0
split access & fwmark
Hi,
I had a nice router which was able to split my outgoing webtraffic over a
dsl line,
then I got a power failure and now my settings are lost and I don''t get it
to run.
I''ve configured a iptable rule like:
/sbin/iptables -A PREROUTING -t mangle -i eth1 -s 192.168.1.10 -p TCP
--dport 80 -j MARK --set-mark 1
and
ip rule add fwmark 1 lookup 10
ip route add default via
2004 Oct 15
0
iproute with fwmark
Hi,
not sure if it will work, i''ve 2 leased lines, behind line 1 is a webserver,
this
server should answer all incomming http requests through leased line 1, the
webserver
self parses other webserver, this outbound traffic should go over leased
line 2.
i''ve successfully added fwmark with iproute, but if i set the policy for the
webserver to
use leased line 2 (for parsing other
2004 Aug 11
0
filter on src/dst and fwmark
hi again list,
first off thanks for the tips roy.
here my question.
i''m using ip based classes in my htb config.
i would like to give some people (eg 192.168.0.20) 4mbit but only if he
downloads from certain ip classes.
i have my iptables marking those classes with 1 for upload and 0 for
download.
and finally the question: what''s the appropriate tc (or maybe iptables)
command