similar to: [Fwd: Re: [PATCH] TC: bug fixes to the "sample" clause]

PATCH 1 ======= On my machine tc does not parse filter "sample" for the u32 filter. Eg: tc filter add dev eth2 parent 1:0 protocol ip prio 1 u32 ht 801: \ classid 1:3 \ sample ip protocol 1 0xff match ip protocol 1 0xff Illegal "sample" The reason is a missing memset. This patch fixes it. diff -Nur iproute-20051007.keep/tc/f_u32.c iproute-20051007/tc/f_u32.c

>From netdev@oss.sgi.com: ----- Forwarded message from jamal <hadi@cyberus.ca> ----- X-Original-To: sebek@localhost X-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2004 03:25:37 +0200 (CEST) Subject: (Long) ANNOUNCE: IMQ replacement WAS(Re: [RFC/PATCH] IMQ port to 2.6 From: jamal <hadi@cyberus.ca> Reply-To: hadi@cyberus.ca To: "Vladimir B. Savkin" <master@sectorb.msk.ru> Cc:

Hi I''m doing traffic shaping with tc on ''10.0.0.0/30'' and ''10.0.0.28/30''. I want to delete part of shaping rules on the fly. (see my configuration at the end of this mail) I wan''t to delete the shaping for ''10.0.0.0/30'' on the fly while still keeping the shaping for part ''10.0.0.28/30'' running. When I for

Hi I have been playing with tc. I''m using htb and sfq. I tried to setup shaping of every ip address within a /20. I found that there must be an upper limit of about 2096 on the number of rules (classes, qdiscs or filters). I was testing a /20 which gives 4096 classes, qdiscs and filters. I''m using hashkey to optimize processing of frames. When executing the script below - it

Hi, I''ve been working on hashing in tc for a month. Since there are only a limited number of avaialbe example on hashing, I''ll be appreciate if someone can my questions as follows: 1. tc filter add dev eth1 protocol ip perent 1:0 \ prio 5 u32 ht 800:: \ match ip src 1.2.0.0/16 \ hashkey mask 0x000000ff at 12 \ link 2: It seems that the hashkey make can only applied to ip

I''m hashing on a non-octet boundary, and it doesn''t seem to be working. I''ve got this set of filters, that does work: # root tc filter add dev eth1 \ parent 1: protocol ip prio 2 \ u32 # ht tc filter add dev eth1 \ parent 1: protocol ip prio 2 \ handle 2: \ u32 divisor 256 # flow tc filter replace dev eth1 \

Hi, I am trying to put together a hashing filter based on example provided in LARTC how-to document. I want to link two hashing filters together where first one will use 3rd octet of an IP address as hashkey and second one will use 4th octet as hash key. How do I tell mask the address so that u32 filter uses 3rd octet as hashkey? Venkatesh K _______________________________________________

Hi i have 2 class C 80.97.103.0/24 and 81.180.12.0/24 but i dont konw how to set hashing tables for HTB tc add dev eth0 parent 1: prio 0 handle 1: protocol ip u32 divisor 256 tc add dev eth0 parent 1: prio 0 protocol ip u32 match src 80.97.103.0/24 hashkey mask 0x000000FF at 12 link 1: but i want 2 hashkey for 80.97.103.0/24 and for 81.180.12.0/24 can somebody help me ?

Hi, I need to set filter-hash and use source-port as hashkey. It seems that I can''t use "hashkey" without using "match". I am using following commands: tc qdisc add ... root handle 1:0 htb # Loop to add 1000 classes (i = 1 to 1000) tc class add ... parent 1:0 classid 1:$i #set filters tc filter add ... protocol ip parent 1:0 u32 tc filter add ...

Hi i have 2 class C 80.97.103.0/24 and 81.180.12.0/24 but i dont konw how to set hashing tables for HTB tc add dev eth0 parent 1: prio 0 handle 1: protocol ip u32 divisor 256 tc add dev eth0 parent 1: prio 0 protocol ip u32 match src 80.97.103.0/24 hashkey mask 0x000000FF at 12 link 1: but i want 2 hashkey for 80.97.103.0/24 and for 81.180.12.0/24 can somebody help me ? this is a part fo my

Hi, When I added this association... class User < ActiveRecord::Base has_one :notify end ...and tried then to update column in User table it will call queries for notify table automatic? Output --------------------------------------------------------------- User Columns (0.041488) SHOW FIELDS FROM `users` User Load (0.001544) SELECT * FROM `users` WHERE (`users`.`nickname` =

hi I would like to ask is the following config correct for what I want to achieve ... Scenario: I have 3 networks 192.168.12.0/24, 192.168.48.0/24, 192.168.56.0/24 and most of the users use 1 IP, some of them more... If I make flat u32-filter search the box will make aprox/max 3 * 256 = 768 checks for every IP, so i''m deciding to deploy u32 hashes.. Here is the config I think to use

Hello! I have a quite complicated setup. In my network on each interface there is bandwidth limitation for each user. Booth outgoing (on interface itself) and incoming (attached IMQ) traffic. There is main HTB class which limits bandwidth for whole interface and HTB subclasses for each user. Filtering is done with hashing filters. This setup was working correctly. But now in the network I

I have a question about a few things: ok when you have parent x:x and handle x:x link x:x flowid and so on. What is the max values of each of these, also where these or some of these hex numbers? I tried this on redhat 7.3 so there may have been some updates, but this is one of the tests I did. [root@RL1 root]# tc filter add dev eth0 protocol ip parent 1:0 prio 10 u32 ht fffe:: match ip dst

On 2016?06?15? 19:55, Jamal Hadi Salim wrote: > On 16-06-15 07:52 AM, Jamal Hadi Salim wrote: >> On 16-06-15 04:38 AM, Jason Wang wrote: >>> We used to queue tx packets in sk_receive_queue, this is less >>> efficient since it requires spinlocks to synchronize between producer >> So this is more exercising the skb array improvements. For tun >> it would be

Hi there, I was updating the R-cmdr add-on (v.1.1-6 to the latest v.1.2) for R (v.2.2.0) in a SunOS9 environment and came across some warnings during my installation - it seems to download the dependencies but runs into the following during install: * Installing *source* package 'acepack' ... ** libs /opt/sfw/R/R-2.2.0/bin/SHLIB: make: not found ERROR: compilation failed for package

I've been trying to install the RODBC dependency for Rcmdr on Rv2.4 on a SunOS9 system. It claims not to be able to create gcc output files (executables) for the installation. This is puzzling since I've been able to install other packages with the same PATH variables and all. Feedback would be much appreciated. Thank you! Sarosh Jamal Geo Computing & IT Specialist, Department of

I've been trying to install the RODBC dependency for Rcmdr on Rv2.4 on a SunOS9 system. It claims not to be able to create gcc output files (executables) for the installation. This is puzzling since I've been able to install other packages with the same PATH variables and all. Feedback would be much appreciated. Thank you! Sarosh Jamal Geo Computing & IT Specialist, Department of

On 16-06-15 07:52 AM, Jamal Hadi Salim wrote: > On 16-06-15 04:38 AM, Jason Wang wrote: >> We used to queue tx packets in sk_receive_queue, this is less >> efficient since it requires spinlocks to synchronize between producer > > So this is more exercising the skb array improvements. For tun > it would be useful to see general performance numbers on user/kernel >

On 16-06-15 07:52 AM, Jamal Hadi Salim wrote: > On 16-06-15 04:38 AM, Jason Wang wrote: >> We used to queue tx packets in sk_receive_queue, this is less >> efficient since it requires spinlocks to synchronize between producer > > So this is more exercising the skb array improvements. For tun > it would be useful to see general performance numbers on user/kernel >