similar to: loadbalancing multipath routing frequently freezes udp connections

Hi list, I try to install the following network: /-----------------\ | Firewall 1 | \-----------------/ ___________________| |_________________ | 10.2.6.1 10.2.2.1 | | eth1 | | 10.2.6.11

On Sun, Jul 19, 2020 at 11:54:06AM +0100, Rui Correia wrote: > Greetings folks. > I've setup libvirtd on my manjaro linux laptop. > Got a couple of VM's running (Win10 and Debian10) through NAT without any > issues. > > This is what the current network diagram looks like and it works fine: > > +-----------------------------------+ >

I have the following scheme: ------------- ------------- | router | eth0 ------------------ eth0 | router | | linux 1 | | linux 2 | | | eth1 ------------------ eth1 | | ------------- ------------- I''d like to do per packet loadbalancing on linux1 and

Hi, We have two internet connections and I would like to loadbalance between the two using advanced routing. The gateway machine to my lan has two interfaces, one connected to lan(eth0) and other to wan (eth1). The wan side interface is connected to a switch which is terminated with two internet connections from two ISPs. I have added the routes as follows, ip route add default scope

Hi folks, I've just been reading about the above command and wonder if anyone has made use of it for load-balancing or if doing so would be completely inappropriate!? I'm thinking of the scenario where there are a number of Asterisk gateways and incoming SIP traffic. From what I've read, with a box in front receiving all incoming traffic the SIPRedirect command could be used to

Hi~ My linux box(kernel 2.4.13; used for NAT) have 3 NICs, two of them are for ADSL(I have two adsl line) and the last is for private network. My ISP doesn''t support multilink. In this situation, How can I use both ppp lines for the internet(load shareing or balancing)? Thanks. Lee.

Hello All, I have a linux box running with three NIC''s, I have used brctl tool to configure this box as a bridge, i have given it ONE logical ipaddres, Every thing is working fine, but now i am required to configure the same bridge as a LOAD BALANCER.... On some googling i found the following link http://lartc.org/howto/lartc.rpdb.multiple-links.html This HOWTO requires me to have one

Hi Daniel, First of all, awfully sorry for replying so late. Unfortunately your reply had gone to the Spam drawer... Also, I'm answering from Gmail's webmail which IIRC only allows for 'quote original post below'. So please forgive me for not following the proper netiquette of 'quote original post above'. > Is net.ipv4.ip_forward set to 0 ? > > I assume

Greetings folks. I've setup libvirtd on my manjaro linux laptop. Got a couple of VM's running (Win10 and Debian10) through NAT without any issues. This is what the current network diagram looks like and it works fine: +-----------------------------------+ | +---------------------+ | | |

Hi, I have the following setup. Two linux systems with two [test] external interfaces encrypted with ipsec [transport]. Two gre tunnels that pass 10.200.0.0/24 and 10.200.1.0/24 network traffic. Testing the balanced tunnels I would setup iptraf on one and ping from the other. The results would be as expected; traffic would be split between the two interfaces. Testing with an ftp transfer of

Hi, Is there a way for dovecot to use a pool of sql (mysql) servers and load balance queries between these? Also fallback to next available sql server if connection to previous one fails. Can dovecot do such things currently? (If not this is feature request). -- Arkadiusz Mi?kiewicz PLD/Linux Team arekm / maven.pl http://ftp.pld-linux.org/

On 2020-07-20 05:32, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > On Sun, Jul 19, 2020 at 11:54:06AM +0100, Rui Correia wrote: >> Greetings folks. >> I've setup libvirtd on my manjaro linux laptop. >> Got a couple of VM's running (Win10 and Debian10) through NAT without >> any >> issues. >> >> This is what the current network diagram looks like and it works

Hi all, I'm using Debian, I want to make a local repository which can let me install packages more conveniently. Considering that the rsync tool is the Debian official proposed tool for syncing the files among its different rsync server sites, I use the rsync client to downloading the deb packages from the different rsync servers distributed around the world-wide for good loadbalancing and

I have 2 ADSL ad1 and ad2 , one PC for my firewall and some deamon on it with 3 ethernet : eth0 connect to my LAN ( 192.168.60.0/24 ) and 2 other connect to ad1 and ad2 |eth1 (10.0.1.2)--------------------ad1 ( ADSL 1 ) | My LAN(192.168.60.0/24) |---------eth0( 192.168.60.2)--> PC | |eth2 (10.0.2.2)---------------------ad2 (ADSL 2 ) All computer in LAN has default router =

Hi all iam trying to deploy loadbalance and failover My setup description --Fedora Core 4 --Linux 2.6.12.3 #1 SMP Mon Jul 25 22:37:34 IST 2005 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux --tc utility, iproute2-ss050314 --ip utility, iproute2-ss050314 --iptables v1.3.0 And i had deployed Following configuration #table main with priority 50, the highest one ip rule add prio 50 table main #table 201 ip rule add

Hi, my company have just bought new network and I have question about one problem. As in topic we must use few completely different dsl''s and balance traffic between them. 2M/0,5M 4Mb/0,5M 8M/0,5M M=Mb/s I''ve never done such thing before so I have doubts how it will work. If the links are symmetric 2/2 4/4 8/8 there is no problem because with weights I can compensate the

On Wed, 24 Apr 2019 at 06:01, likun <kun.li at ucarinc.com> wrote: > Hi?guys. > > There is a wierd problem with iptables recently, hopes somebody can help > me. > > I have installed Centos 7.2.1511 on a bare metal Dell server these days, > disabled firewalld and enabled iptables.services, and setup a group of very > simple rules, as the following: > > I believe

Hi?guys. There is a wierd problem with iptables recently, hopes somebody can help me. I have installed Centos 7.2.1511 on a bare metal Dell server these days, disabled firewalld and enabled iptables.services, and setup a group of very simple rules, as the following: # iptables-save # Generated by iptables-save v1.4.21 on Tue Apr 23 09:15:14 2019 *filter :INPUT ACCEPT [0:0] :FORWARD ACCEPT

Hello, Stephen, thank you for input. Yes, these servers have the same firewall rules, and both of them have the same problem from time to time, most of time they are good. Actually, these servers are newly installed to be used as the Glusterfs storage server, so not much data flowing at this time. >From the sysctl output, I suppose it can't be a conntrack table overflow :

On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 03:34:03PM +0100, Rui Correia wrote: > > Is net.ipv4.ip_forward set to 0 ? > > > > > I assume you're asking if this is setup on the host and not on the VM's. > I've checked the host and it is configured like this: > $ sysctl net.ipv4.ip_forward > net.ipv4.ip_forward = 1 This is good. > Should I change it to =0 ? It