similar to: Are you using Array#in_groups_of(n, false)?

Rails 1.1 was a big upgrade with a lot of new features and we''ve been working hard since its release to polish off the kinks revealed after it was deployed to the masses. Rails 1.1.1 contains fixes for things like Prototype memory leaks in IE 6, Oracle adapter runnings, and a number of compatibility tweaks to make most older applications work. This release still doesn''t work

The cat is out of the bag, so here''s the full disclosure edition of the current security vulnerability. With Rails 1.1.0 through 1.1.5 (minus the short-lived 1.1.3), you can trigger the evaluation of Ruby code through the URL because of a bug in the routing code of Rails. This means that you can essentially take down a Rails process by starting something like /script/profiler, as the code

So apparently 1.8.4 is soon forthcoming. We need testing against it. Could someone help out with that? I believe Ara already checked into some of the issues, do you know if those are resolved, Ara? -- David Heinemeier Hansson http://www.loudthinking.com -- Broadcasting Brain http://www.basecamphq.com -- Online project management http://www.backpackit.com -- Personal information manager

We''re still hard at work on Rails 1.2, which features all the new dandy REST stuff and more, but a serious security concern has come to our attention that needed to be addressed sooner than the release of 1.2 would allow. So here''s Rails 1.1.5! This is a MANDATORY upgrade for anyone not running on a very recent edge (which isn''t affected by this). If you have a public

The cat is out of the bag, so here''s the full disclosure edition of the current security vulnerability. With Rails 1.1.0 through 1.1.5 (minus the short-lived 1.1.3), you can trigger the evaluation of Ruby code through the URL because of a bug in the routing code of Rails. This means that you can essentially take down a Rails process by starting something like /script/profiler, as the code

This is the point release to tie up the various loose ends introduced with Rails 0.10.0. Action Web Service has seen the most interesting improvements feature-wise with a new generator and tie-ins with the testing setup. There''s better support for XML-RPC: Instead of performing type checking on the parameters the remote client sends, AWS does casting to try and make it compatible

There''s nothing like pushing a new major update in order to find bugs in the code when its exposed to a couple of hundred working applications. Thankfully the fixes were almost as swift as the reports. In any case, you''ll _definitely_ want to upgrade to 0.12.1 right away. There''s a good handful of fixes for both Action Pack and Active Record (mostly concerning the

Since the WEBrick server has been so beefed up in Rails 0.9, I think it''s a darn shame that its lingering outside the support of custom pretty URLs. Also, it seems that the connection between mod_rewrite and url_for and friends is pretty fuzzy for most people. Hence, as we''ve talked about before, the rewriting of the url should be pulled in-house. There has been a few

Hey all, The following has two columns. Each column has a head with a name and then a data cell with a time directly below it. I''m wondering how I can get the time to display next to the name, not below it. - @clock.in_groups_of(2) do |group| %tr.header - group.each do |item| %th= item.name %tr - group.each do |item| %td

We''re still hard at work on Rails 1.2, which features all the new dandy REST stuff and more, but a serious security concern has come to our attention that needed to be addressed sooner than the release of 1.2 would allow. So here''s Rails 1.1.5! This is a MANDATORY upgrade for anyone not running on a very recent edge (which isn''t affected by this). If you have a public

I''m using the subdomains as accounts method fine on a project, but I''m wondering what is the best way to differentiate between account subdomains to access the app using an account, and www.domain.com and domain.com in order to show normal site content. I''ve noticed that on Backpack, it seems that when you leave the information pages and start using the app,

Hello- I''m new to the ruby-based schemas and migrations. As I''m looking over examples and such online, I see that many of them don''t make use of schema-enforced attributes. For example, instead of: t.column "post_id", :integer, :default => 0, :null => false They do: t.column "post_id", :integer So I''m wondering -- is this

Been thinking about something lately and wanted to hear what others thought. After watching the video[1] of DHH with the slides[2] I really liked some of the ideas presented. Many people have noted the ugliness of needing secondary actions since HTTP actions do not cover the full range of CRUDness (i.e. the "GET /people;new" and "GET /people/1;edit"). Also the need for

I''m trying to build a table out using in groups of, but I''d also like to be able to customize the first and last rows. Apart from the actual formatting, is there an efficient way to figure out how many total groups there are and what group the iteration is in? -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this

With what class type can I assign value to a timestamp field? I tried Time.now and DateTime.now both failed (did nothing).

OK, I have some basic functionality to support bind variables, it appears to work with the ''old'' %s style too. I''ve altered sanitize_conditions in activerecord/lib/active_record/base.rb to check whether bind variables are in the statement (/\?/). If they are, replace all the ?s to escaped values from the arguments array. else santize and expand. There are a few

Instiki 0.9.2 has arrived. * The notorious "rollbacks by crawlers" bug fixed. * Instiki is distributed as a gem (experimental) * New maintainer (yours truly) * Assorted other minor changes Best regards, Alexey Verkhovsky ============= Don''t shoot the pianist, he''s doing his best README Path: README Last Update: Fri Jan 07 10:06:43

Does anyone know how to view the new source in IE after an AJAX update? When I "view -> source" I get the original page source, not the page source as updated. Thanks in advance, Bill -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://wrath.rubyonrails.org/pipermail/rails/attachments/20060403/e8d96b2e/attachment.html

Hi all, Here''s another contribution for anyone interested. In Railscast episode 28, Ryan Bates showed us in_groups_of which allows you to group array members such as >> list = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7] => [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7] >> list.in_groups_of(3) => [[1, 2, 3], [4, 5, 6], [7, nil, nil]] This allows you to iterate over the groups and, for example, display a list

To play with RJS I just made a "rake freeze edge". But this copies only the libs into vendor/rails and any attempt of "rake update_javascripts" fails. But all the he required javascripts are there, at: BASEPATH/vendor/rails/actionpack/lib/action_view/helpers/javascripts/ Except of prototype, they seem to have no version number, so I am asking whether I should take those