similar to: [OT?] MikroTik instead Linux ?

I am working on my Diploma Thesis on Computer Science Engineering. The main idea behind of my work is to make it possible to have a Linux box combining multiple ISP/network connections together providing a single connection with an aggregated bandwith. I have been surfing the Internet and I haven''t found anything like that running on Linux. I would like to implement it using iproute 2

Hi, I dont really know if this is the right place to post this question..If its not pl let me know... Here is what i am looking for. I have two machines with two ethernet cards.One of these machine has an ftp server(vsftpd). When i request a file from the first machine i want that machine be able to start an ftp, and when each of the packet of the file go to one of the ethernet cards, i want

Hi, this might be a dumb question, but I''m not finding much information online. I''m trying to setup a 2.6 linux box to run nat across multiple upstream links as a simple way to aggregate bandwidth. I found the instructions in lartc section 4.2 (http://lartc.org/howto/lartc.rpdb.multiple-links.html) fairly clear and straightforward. I implemented those, and a couple of trivial

Hello I have two DSL modems witch are connected to my isp, in future my boss want to buy another connection via DSL modem. Then i will have 3 DSL modems. With every DSL modem i get 3x8 IP`s (netmask 248) from my ISP, now i have question how to configure gateway wich tools should i use. Because ip route and next hop via. wich i use now makes his work fine but with new kernels there is an error

I have 2 ADSL ad1 and ad2 , one PC for my firewall and some deamon on it with 3 ethernet : eth0 connect to my LAN ( 192.168.60.0/24 ) and 2 other connect to ad1 and ad2 |eth1 (10.0.1.2)--------------------ad1 ( ADSL 1 ) | My LAN(192.168.60.0/24) |---------eth0( 192.168.60.2)--> PC | |eth2 (10.0.2.2)---------------------ad2 (ADSL 2 ) All computer in LAN has default router =

I''m moving to a new place and my new flatmate wants a router because he likes the cleaness of it all in a non geeky way which I can understand. This means it''s going to be hard for me to pursude him to let me run a computer as a router to act as bandwidth cop. But I don''t fancy trying to use ssh, VNC and games while he''s using WindowsUpdate or p2p. So I need

hi all, i am setting up a load balancing netwrok with failover, i have applied julian patch, but whenever i try to traceroute from any client node, it gives me two entries for that destination, but i get different interface for that entries, so it doesn''t forward my requests, i have done masquerading for client nodes, the ip rule/route are as follows, ip rule add prio 222 table

Just wondering if someone could answer this question for me. I would like to route public addresses only. Their will be no firewall but maybe a few rules to deny certain types of traffic. Here is the configuration of the router. My provider gave a me a /30 link to their router also they gave me a /25 network for my customers public ip''s Their cisco router has static route entrys for my

Hello I have the following problem: LAN<--->LINUX_ROUTER<--> 2 internet gateways gateway1: adsl gateway2: ppp connection I want the following Machines from LAN going to Internet tcp port 80 :-> gateway1 Machines from LAN goint to Internet tcp port 22 :-> gateway2 Everything else: -> gateway1 How can I acomplish this? I am using kernel 2.4.24 Can I combine dead gateway

Hi! In our students'' hostel we have 6 DSL lines (dialups to different providers); we have set up a linux box (currently running 2.6.11-rc2-mm2, but the problem described hereafter also applies to previous 2.6-series kernels) with help from http://lartc.org/howto/lartc.rpdb.multiple-links.html#AEN298 Our Setup looks like this: 10.0.0.0/8 10.70.255.1 +----------+ +-----------+ |

You want multiple IP Addresses for email if you are hosting more than one domain. The reason is, everyone now checks for reverse DNS with email so you need a different public IP Address for each email domain. This way, all the reverse DNS translations will be unique. For apache, you can have multiple websites sharing the same IP Address as long as you don''t do anything with SSL. SSL

Hello, Please excuse my (probably newbie) question, but: Since RouterOS, MikroTik's proprietary OS, is largely based on GNU/Linux, anyone knows a way to run tinc on a MikroTik device? This would be in order to make an (imposed, no choice given...) MikroTik device (say the B1100AHX4 router) to participate in a tinc mesh, in interoperation with GNU/Linux machines. Please see:

Hi all, My app is going to count sth based on poll id in the url. The url looks like: http://address.com?id=dwNKiItvcyrQ5sycnIhmJablDfXsc9tshaGIVyNIei7.e7&some_other_parameters In a controller, I''ve created a hash where the keys are the ids: @codes = { ''dwNKiItvcyrQ5sycnIhmJablDfXsc9tshaGIVyNIei7.e7'' => {:partner_id => 0,

Hi, I''ve a linux as router nat + firewall (POLICY DROP for INPUT OUTPUT and FORWARD) but, I''ve put next rules for p2p software on FORWARD chain [... snip ... ] iptables -F FORWARD iptables -P FORWARD DROP iptables -A FORWARD -p tcp --dport 80 -j ACCEPT iptables -A FORWARD -p tcp --dport 25 -j ACCEPT [... snip ... ] iptables -A FORWARD -m ipp2p --ipp2p -j ACCEPT iptables -A

Hi. there is a way to MARK udp VOIP (SIP) traffic, in order to put in a highest prio class ? Traffic flow seems start on udp 5060 port, but next both server and client seems jump to a random(?) port. I can''t use CONNMARK because is udp traffic. I only see a pattern for L7 patch in order to SIP traffic identification , but I run 2.4 kernel series . When you patch 2.4 kernel with

Hi, I want to set up a Linux as Access Point, and maybe, as router too. There is some distro or minidistro in order to do that ? thanks in advance andres

on Fair NAT: ------------- [...] # Correcting TOS for large packets with Minimize-Delay-TOS $BIN_IPT -t mangle -A $FN_CHK_TOS -p tcp -m length --length 0:512 -j RETURN $BIN_IPT -t mangle -A $FN_CHK_TOS -p udp -m length --length 0:1024 -j RETURN $BIN_IPT -t mangle -A $FN_CHK_TOS -j TOS --set-tos Maximize-Throughput $BIN_IPT -t mangle -A $FN_CHK_TOS -j RETURN [...] I think that best is: [...] #

*hvjunk said:* > Get a RPi (or faster/cheaper/equivalent), and bridge it into the Mikrotik………. Unfortunately, I don't think this is an option (even if I may put there a full PC, not only a Raspberry Pi), for a few reasons: - what I'm trying to achieve is to substitute MikroTik's native L2TP/IPSec tunnels with tinc, not to have TWO tunnels - supposing I have two different tunnels

Hi If I have a HTB class with 128kbit, and I want to put "N" users in that class ( in order to share bandwidth fairly ) , which is better for me ? esfq (hash dst) or wrr ? I would attach esfq or wrr to HTB parent class. Also I''ve readed on Jim script that over WRR put a RED qdisc, but I don''t understand it. bests andres

Hi, I used to patch my squid with ZPH patch on http://www.it-academy.bg/zph/ > The idea behind this patch is to allow classification > of packets generated from the squid cache engine towards > clients. > The classification is based on whether the content is > being served from cache (a cache HIT), or > is being retrieved from a remote server (a cache MISS). Very useful