similar to: TCNG issue - parent class restrictions are not honored

Hello, I''ve been using a TCNG-based traffic shaper for about a year and a half now to manage bandwidth usage of a number of our fiber and wireless customers, and it''s always worked extremely well. Right now though, I''m finding myself with a problem I''m not sure how to solve properly: We also provide colocation hosting for several of those clients, and

Hello, A while ago I switched a bandwidth management setup from bash shell script using tc to a MUCH more readable tcng solution (yes, the same one I asked for help with earlier. It worked perfectly, thanks) and it''s working very well. However, one of our clients now has a slightly unique situation, in that they''re using colocation hosting to host their webserver with us, but

I've been working for hours with Samba on Ubuntu Server 9.10 (Samba version 3.4.0), trying to get it setup simply as a fileserver that performs authentication to an NT 4 server (yes, I know, old and out of date). After much struggling, I finally realized that my configuration *was* working when the clients connecting (from XP, and Win2k clients, mostly) were actually joined to the domain

Hi, I have the following network: ---------- |Internet| ---------- | -------------------- --------------------- |Wireless Modem |- ))----((- |'admin' on DHCP | | on 10.0.0.* | | --------------------- -------------------- | ---------------------- | -(( |'client1' on DHCP | |wired

> and forward- and reverse DNS records for your mailserver match. do even googles ips confirm to this standard?

I''m trying to get picture from ethloop and gnuplot. But the output seems weird. I still do not know why and want some examples. Thanks in advance. --------------------------------- Do You Yahoo!? 注册世界一流品质的雅虎免费电邮 --0-1760319804-1107141989=:62961 Content-Type: text/html; charset=gb2312 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit <DIV>I''m trying to get picture from ethloop and

Hi, I''m trying to puppet kick with class option. Pupper Master: puppetmaster.example.com Puppet Client1: host1.example.net Puppet Client2: host2.example.net But I get this error. --- [root@puppetmaster ~]# puppet kick --class test --debug test: host1.example.net.example.com, host2.example.net.example.com Triggering host1.example.net.example.com, host2.example.net.example.com Host

basecamp prefixes each url with a client name... client1.updatelog.com/todos client2.updatelog.com/milestones any ideas on how this is done? - one app? - one app per client? - one app per domain? -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

Rowland, Can I use AD bind as slave for some zones of our bind master server? On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 1:00 PM, Rowland Penny <rpenny at samba.org> wrote: > On Wed, 17 May 2017 11:59:21 -0300 > Elias Pereira via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > > > > > Is anything else listening on port 53 ? > > > > > > I don't think so.

I am using the script below to simulate a very low bandwidth connection. I found that I could turn the bandwidth knob down to about 4kbit, but below that I didn''t get any traffic through. I''ve had a look at this generally, but couldn''t find an answer. It doesn''t even seem like the first reply packet gets through. I have tried it with much bigger buffers,

I have had a very odd problem for a while now, and am hoping this will ring a bell for someone who can point me in the right direction. I had a previous Samba DC (v3.5.6) in my home network, running on a command-line Slackware box. For a variety of reasons I decided to switch to Debian Jessie, which included an upgrade to Samba 4.2.10. I did NOT properly migrate my samba files to the new

To test gluster's behavior under heavy load, I'm currently doing this on two machines sharing a common /mnt/gfs gluster mount: ssh bal-6.example.com apt-get install dbench && dbench 6 -t 60 -D /mnt/gfs ssh bal-7.example.com apt-get install dbench && dbench 6 -t 60 -D /mnt/gfs One of the processes usually dies pretty quickly like this: [608] open

On 2/14/20 11:44 AM, Tobias Kirchhofer wrote: > On 14 Feb 2020, at 11:06, Armin Schindler wrote: > > Hello! > > we are about to move from cyrus to dovecot and have one open issue > for that migration. > With cyrus we have "shared/" folders with a name that is self defined like > shared/project-xyz > but the email address for direct

I installed 1 MDS , 2 OSS/OST and 2 Lustre Client. My MDS shows: [code] [root at MDS ~]# lctl list_nids 10.94.214.185 at tcp [root at MDS ~]# [/code] On Lustre Client1: [code] [root at lustreclient1 lustre]# lfs df -h UUID bytes Used Available Use% Mounted on lustre-MDT0000_UUID 4.5G 274.3M 3.9G 6% /mnt/lustre[MDT:0] lustre-OST0000_UUID

I have just implemented an NT Domain using samba 3.0.4 on Slackware 9.1, a very simple LAN with 4 or 5 clients. Clients: Win XP Pro. Everything looks OK so far, apart from this issue: I create machine accounts for existing client machines using their existing names ... works fine, they can join domain. Except that we want to rename the existing machines using a new consistent format (client1,

On 2/14/20 2:23 PM, Tobias Kirchhofer wrote: > On 14 Feb 2020, at 14:05, Armin Schindler wrote: > >> On 2/14/20 11:44 AM, Tobias Kirchhofer wrote: >>> On 14 Feb 2020, at 11:06, Armin Schindler wrote: >>> >>> ??? Hello! > > [?] > >>> For our new setup (planned with CentOS 8, waiting for the official repo for the latest dovecot >>>

On 7/22/20 7:42 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > See also: > https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2020-July/msg00090.html > --- > docs/nbdkit-plugin.pod | 57 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--- > docs/nbdkit-protocol.pod | 7 +++-- > 2 files changed, 58 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) I'm playing with code for an initial implementation of this, and quickly

Hi all, We use mongrel behind apache (using mod_proxy_balancer) to run an internal app for our business. Lately we''ve been seeing frequent errors from some of our mongrel processes. [Sun Dec 16 08:48:47 2007] [error] [client <CLIENT1>] (70007)The timeout specified has expired: proxy: error reading status line from remote server 127.0.0.1, referer:

Hi, Looking at the following sample, shouldn''t the client1_a be restricted to 35kBps even when there is 50kBps available. Please see the following configuration and suggest. What I wanted to do is I have clients grouped on VIP and Poor. The VIP clients and poor clients may be subscribed with the same bandwidth but I would like to prioritize the VIP clients. The VIP client will get the

I installed 1 MDS , 2 OSS/OST and 2 Lustre Client. My MDS shows: [code] [root at MDS ~]# lctl list_nids 10.94.214.185 at tcp [root at MDS ~]# [/code] On Lustre Client1: [code] [root at lustreclient1 lustre]# lfs df -h UUID bytes Used Available Use% Mounted on lustre-MDT0000_UUID 4.5G 274.3M 3.9G 6% /mnt/lustre[MDT:0]