similar to: working patches for load balancing

Hi all :) there is somekind of strange Routing problem that im getting with Linux-2.6.16 and iproute 2.6.16 , when i use command like : ip route add default nexthop via 1.1.1.1 dev eth0 nexthop via 1.1.1.2 dev eth1 all packets goes on 1.1.1.2 ( always last interface ) , whats is the problem ? this situation also tested with equalize flag , on two physical interface and etc ... -- Lady Luck

Hi, there is a way to graph host''s traffic from my lan ? I''ve a linux router (2.4.x kernel), and a lan: linux router : 192.168.1.254 host 1: 192.168.1.1 host 2: 192.168.1.2 host 3: 192.168.1.3 I''m looking for a way to graph traffic ( in / out ) from each 3 hosts, and store total traffic on a mysql table, in order to make statistics later. I think I can do with Mrtg,

Hi list, i have the following situ 2 ISP's one internal network. Load Balancing between the ISP's (with mpath) I want to route speciffic traffic over only one of the ISP's more specifficaly the ICQ traffic i have the following configs iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -p tcp --dport 5190 -j MARK --set-mark 0x5190 ip ru a from xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx prio 201 t isp_rules1 ip ru a fwmark

I am trying to build a trafic control rule set for a huge NATed network, and I have it working for single known addresses but I need to scale it to 16M potential client addresses. I''m using iptables for NAT. Incoming traffic is simple because I can match destination address, outgoing traffic I use iptables IPMARK then tc match mark and it works perfectly if I build rules for each client

Anyone using it? I''ve tried but after about 5 min I always get kernel panic. My setup is based on nano.txt. I works well but only if CONFIG_IP_ROUTE_MULTIPATH_CACHED=n. I just wanted to play with the new mpath feature of ip. But enabling CONFIG_IP_ROUTE_MULTIPATH_CACHED always resuts in kernel panic. I''m not using any kernel patches from http://www.ssi.bg/~ja/ - are they needed

Hi, I have a router that got its second link. I was trying to do load balancing, but i can not get it to work properly. Just one link works at time, and is always the second in the command ip route add default table 222 proto static. Am I missing something? My script is below. I am using Debian, tried with kernel 2.6.19 (my compilation) or debian''s one (2.6.18-3-486), same results

Hello! I have trouble with multipath routing. Those options are enabled in kernel: [*] IP: policy routing [*] IP: equal cost multipath [*] IP: equal cost multipath with caching support (EXPERIMENTAL) <*> MULTIPATH: round robin algorithm But issuing: ip r a 1.2.3.0/23 scope global equalize nexthop via 80.245.176.11 \ dev eth0 weight 1 nexthop via 80.245.176.13 dev eth0

Hello everyone, this is my first post to the list, so hello again. We're a small company in Romania and we're trying to set up a really small version of "call center". That is, we want to get a few land-lines from our telco in different countys and "bridge" all calls to our HQ, in order to make it cheeper for our clients to call us. Unfortunatelly there's no ISP

Hello, does anybody know if quagga for CentOS 5.3 is compiled with -enable-multipath? I want to implement ECMP over 2 ISP. Thanks, Cristi Carstea

Hi. I''ve trying to balance outgoing traffic by using multipath routes, but I can''t get it to work. Only one of the routes are used. I''m adding the route like this: ip route add table 101 default \ nexthop via X.X.X.X nexthop via Y.Y.Y.Y It shows up the routing table like this: default nexthop via X.X.X.X dev vlan110 weight 1

Are there any other wireless IP phones out there other then the Cisco 7920?? -- James Moran <jmoran@potentialtech.com> Potential Technologies

Ok ive been trying to get this to work for about half a year now. Ive searched all over the internet for a solution for my problem. Ive found some solutions, but they only led me to yet more problems. What we want to do is the following: I live in a student complex with 7 other people. Every room has its own internet connection from the same ISP. Ip, gateway, subnet are asigned through dhcp on

I found that in my kernel config : # CONFIG_NET_KEY is not set CONFIG_INET=y CONFIG_IP_MULTICAST=y CONFIG_IP_ADVANCED_ROUTER=y CONFIG_IP_MULTIPLE_TABLES=y CONFIG_IP_ROUTE_FWMARK=y CONFIG_IP_ROUTE_MULTIPATH=y CONFIG_IP_ROUTE_VERBOSE=y # CONFIG_IP_PNP is not set # CONFIG_NET_IPIP is not set # CONFIG_NET_IPGRE is not set But no CONFIG_IP_ROUTE_MULTIPATH_CACHED. -----Message

I'm using shorewall 3.0.4 with ubuntu dapper. I've compiled the kernel with the option CONFIG_IP_ROUTE_MULTIPATH_CACHED=n. I had a trouble with, pptp connection, I'm trying to connect a using microsoft vpn a vpn server out of my lan, and don't work. My files <providers> ADSL1 1 1 main eth1.600 10.190.1.1 track,balance eth0 ADSL1 2 2 main eth1.601 10.190.2.1

Hi list, I have tried google but just cant get this to work or figure it out. My setup ======== vanilla 2.6.13 kernel with CONFIG_IP_ROUTE_MULTIPATH=y CONFIG_IP_ROUTE_MULTIPATH_CACHED=y CONFIG_IP_ROUTE_MULTIPATH_RR=y CONFIG_IP_ROUTE_MULTIPATH_RANDOM=y CONFIG_IP_ROUTE_MULTIPATH_WRANDOM=y CONFIG_IP_ROUTE_MULTIPATH_DRR=y My configuration: A host with two ppp links. Ontop of these two ppp dialup

Tom wrote : >My advice to you is still the same -- you are going to have to use tcpdump >or ethereal to see what is happening. You have the computer there in front >of you >-- we don''t. So only you are going to be able to solve this. We are not. >From the dump you sent, it looks like many SYN packets are being sent on >ppp0 >and never replied to. So you need to

I have a 2.6.12(ubuntu-patchset), kernel recompiled with this routing options: [*] IP: advanced router [*] IP: policy routing [*] IP: equal cost multipath Load balancing is working great, but i have problems whits long term tcp flows (like msn-messenger or vpns or any other type of long term ip based conection). I assume this is because after a period of time, the per-host

Hi Andreas! I mainly understand what you mean, but best for me would be if you could make an example from the script I have. I know I did something wrong into it, but I still can''t see the error. If you could fix the error from my script that would be much appreciated. Looking forward to hear from you, Daniel Phlander lartc-request@mailman.ds9a.nl wrote: Send LARTC mailing list

Hi, With kernel 2.4 I was able to use equalize to send our outgoing packets to two different routers (our isp supports this setup), like this: ip route add default src ip.a.dd.rr equalize nexthop via <router1> weight 1 nexthop via <router2> weight 1 The two routes were used equally on a per packet basis, not per flow or per cached route, but per packet, each line has 800k upload

Hi Andreas! I mainly understand what you mean, I tried to fix something on the script, I don''t know if I did it well. Can you take another look on it please and if is wrong to make the corrections directly on it so that I see where the mistake is... With this script I want to make limits for IP class 85.120.48.0/25 for international traffic in 256 KBps classes and for metropolitan