similar to: Interested in contributing to Lustre

Hello, in preparation for CentOS 6.5 I was trying to build Lustre 1.8 client on CentOS 6.4 updated with 2.6.32-431 kernel. Seems like recent changes in fs.h (/usr/src/kernels/2.6.32-431.el6.x86_64/include/linux/fs.h) is causing problems. make[5]: Entering directory `/usr/src/kernels/2.6.32-431.el6.x86_64'' cc1: warnings being treated as errors

Configure fails at testing for openib - anyone an idea? Thanks Michaell configure:10034: checking whether to enable OpenIB gen2 support configure:10138: cp conftest.c build && make -d modules CC=gcc -f /home/mhebenst/lustre-2.3.0/build/Makefile LUSTRE_LINUX_CONFIG=/adm in/extra/linux-2.6.32-358.2.1.el6.x86_64.crt1/.config LINUXINCLUDE= -I/usr/local/ofed/3.5/src/compat-rdma-3.5/include

Intel??????????Whamcloud??????????Lustre???????????????Whamcloud???Lustre???????????? ????? 2012?10?30? ? 11?2? ???????? ??? ????????2? ??????A?8? ?????????????http://www.whamcloud.com/events/lustre-installation-and-administration-beijing-china/ ???????????????? The 1st Lustre Administration and Installation training in Great China area after Intel Corporation acquired Whamcloud will soon be

Whamcloud and EMC are jointly investigating how to be able to contribute the Lustre client code into the upstream Linux kernel. As a prerequisite to this, EMC is working to clean up the Lustre client code to better match the kernel coding style, and one of the anticipated major obstacles to upstream kernel submission is the heavy use of code abstraction via libcfs for portability to other

Whamcloud and EMC are jointly investigating how to be able to contribute the Lustre client code into the upstream Linux kernel. As a prerequisite to this, EMC is working to clean up the Lustre client code to better match the kernel coding style, and one of the anticipated major obstacles to upstream kernel submission is the heavy use of code abstraction via libcfs for portability to other

LUG 2013 is being held in San Diego this year, April 15-19. Intel and Aeon Computing are co-sponsoring a Pre-LUG party that first Monday night, Apr 15th. Beer and Lustre, a great combination! We''ll be in the Omni Hotel, the same location as LUG itself, up on the 10th floor, catching up with old Lustre friends and hopefully make some new ones. Please join us! For more information, email

LUG 2013 is being held in San Diego this year, April 15-19. Intel and Aeon Computing are co-sponsoring a Pre-LUG party that first Monday night, Apr 15th. Beer and Lustre, a great combination! We''ll be in the Omni Hotel, the same location as LUG itself, up on the 10th floor, catching up with old Lustre friends and hopefully make some new ones. Please join us! For more information, email

Greetings, I was trying to update the Lustre Wikipedia page today, and while checking the latest release version, I found that the 2.x download links from these pages do not work: http://wiki.lustre.org/index.php/Download:Download http://lists.lustre.org/pipermail/lustre-announce/2010-August/000250.html http://downloads.lustre.org/public/lustre/ http://wiki.lustre.org/index.php/Main_Page I

Hello, I am having trouble installing the server modules for lustre 2.1.4 and use mellanox''s OFED distribution so we may use infiniband. Would you folks look at my procedure and results below and let me know what you think? Thanks very much! The mellanox ofed installation builds and installs some kernel modules too, so I used this method to ensure OFED compiled against the correct

In hopes of improving the quality, coverage, and currency of the Lustre User Manual, I''m putting out a call to the Lustre community for contributors to this important resource. The user manual is especially important for new users to Lustre, but has fallen into some disrepair now that there is no longer a dedicated documentation writer for it. As well, there are many sections of the

In hopes of improving the quality, coverage, and currency of the Lustre User Manual, I''m putting out a call to the Lustre community for contributors to this important resource. The user manual is especially important for new users to Lustre, but has fallen into some disrepair now that there is no longer a dedicated documentation writer for it. As well, there are many sections of the

We have just discovered that a large buffer cache generated from traversing a lustre file system will cause a significant system overhead for applications with high memory demands. We have seen a 50% slowdown or worse for applications. Even High Performance Linpack, that have no file IO whatsoever is affected. The only remedy seems to be to empty the buffer cache from memory by running

Hello guys, does anyone of you have problems with chown and chmod operations taking extremely long time to complete. For example chown on 200 MB folder is taking minutes. The MDS is not loaded at all. All other operations (file read and write) seem to be doing fine. Any help is greatly appreciated. _______________________________________________ Lustre-discuss mailing list

On Mon, 15 May 2017 at 20:05 zulu, Frank Thommen wrote: > lustre driver https://downloads.hpdd.intel.com/public/lustre/latest-feature-release/el7.3.1611/

Hi all, I used the method described below to build client rpms with the source kit lustre-1.8.5.tar.gz. There was only one error reported during the make rpms, relating to lustre-iolit-1.2-root, but the rpms were built under /usr/src/packages/RPMS/x86_64. The rpms lustre-modules, lustre and lustre-tests were then installed smoothly without any complaints. But the subsequent "modprobe

Hi, I have a query regarding Lustre Throughput Numbers with mdtest benchmark.I am running mdtest benhmark with following options :- /home/meshram/mpich2-new/mpich2-1.4/mpich2-install/bin/mpirun -np 256 -hostfile ./hostfile ./mdtest -z 3 -b 10 -I 5 -v -d /tmp/l66 where , mdtest - is the standard benchmark to test metadata operations. [ https://computing.llnl.gov/?set=code&page=sio_downloads

Hi, I have a query regarding Lustre Throughput Numbers with mdtest benchmark.I am running mdtest benhmark with following options :- /home/meshram/mpich2-new/mpich2-1.4/mpich2-install/bin/mpirun -np 256 -hostfile ./hostfile ./mdtest -z 3 -b 10 -I 5 -v -d /tmp/l66 where , mdtest - is the standard benchmark to test metadata operations. [ https://computing.llnl.gov/?set=code&page=sio_downloads

Hello All, I have installed and configured Lustre 1.8.4 on SuSe 11.0 and everything works fine if i run modprobe lustre and when the lustre module is getting loaded. But when the server reboots it is not getting loaded. Kindly help. Lnet is configured in /etc/modprobe.conf.local as below. options lnet networks=tcp0(eth0) accept=all For loading lustre module i tried including lustre module in

Hi, On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 03:04:03PM +0200, Frank Thommen wrote: > This problem still bites us. I've tried to play around with DHCP > settings (rd.net.timeout.dhcp, rd.net.dhcp.retry) to no avail. > > I'm happy about /any/ hint. 1) ip route seems ok, but what does your /etc/resolv.conf looks like? 2) could you try with 7.3.1611, 7.2.1511 is no longer supported. Tru >

Hi, We run four-node Lustre 2.3, and I needed to both change hardware under MGS/MDS and reassign an OSS ip. Just the same, I added a brand new 10GE network to the system, which was the reason for MDS hardware change. I ran tunefs.lustre --writeconf as per chapter 14.4 in Lustre Manual, and everything mounts fine. Log regeneration apparently works, since it seems to do something, but