similar to: Shaping per IP in PPPoE borrowing or sharing Uplink or Downlink

hi all. i am currently now serving PPPoE in my area. i had a script generated from tcng that worked perfectly before i started serving PPPoE. the issue is not in the script it self BUT in that "tc" code is not shaping on the ethernet anymore BUT INSTEAD on the pppX devices. I tested it and talking jargon, what should i do? The issue is that for each PPPoE login, PPPoE-server

Hi, I''m in a process of setting up a firewall system, which is going to be also an ipsec/l2tp and pptp vpn server for some mobile clients. The problem is, that the system has two ISPs a cable one (no problems here) and a DSL provider. Because of the DSL provider the system is going to have one pppN interface for DSL (net zone) and many pppX interfaces for l2tp/pptp (loc zone)

Hi, I have established two connections to the same ISP. After that ip route list showed this: 195.14.247.94 dev ppp0 proto kernel scope link src 81.173.141.207 195.14.247.94 dev ppp1 proto kernel scope link src 81.173.237.84 192.168.0.0/24 dev eth0 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.0.1 default via 195.14.247.94 dev ppp0 I want 192.168.0.2 to connect to the internet by ppp1 and all

Hi folks, i spent my whole day trying to set up my linux router using load balancing with multiple uplinks. I mainly focused on the nano howto, but somewhere I have a big mistake within my head. Basically the load-balancing is working, but not on a per-connection basis - just on a per packet basis. Practically this is not usable of course <g> But as far as I understood it should work..

Hello all, I have browsed archives and real all available HOWTOs, but I still have a few doubts. My set up is a router, as below. LAN(100MB)-------------(eth1)Linux-Router(eth0)---------------WAN(2MB/512) My aim is to cotrol both uplink and downlink bandwidth. For uplink control, I will use HTB on WAN interface. For downlink, I plan to attach HTB on LAN interface(both egress/outgoing). No

I have been testing wondershaper 1.1a with htb. DOWNLINK=2304 UPLINK=1024 DEV=wlan0 No other changes have been made, except to comment out the 2 lines to allow the script to run. When I do a speed test from sites like www.toast.net/performance, I only get speeds equal to my UPLINK speed. I expected a speed closer to the DOWNLINK. Am I missing something here? TIA, -- -Wes Hegge Technical

Hello to everyone, Can someone help me with hints on how to configure a pppoe gateway on a linux box with 200+ clients behind it ? I''ve read that user-space daemons give A LOT of CPU overhead. I''m opened to ANY solution ! -- Radu Cugut mobile: +40 742 045686 web: http://rcugut.has.it

My Internet gateway is using ADSL PPPoE connection with dynamic public IP assigned by ISP. My Internet gateway is Redhat AS3 U2, shorewall 2.0.9 As my ISP provided 4 simultaneous pppoe dailup connection for the same physical adsl line. My linux server can be configured for multiple pppoe connection i.e. ppp0, ppp1, ppp2, ppp3 Is it possible of shorewall to assigned say ppp0''s IP is

I need basic PPPoE startup help. adsl-start DID bring up my PPPoE link (ppp0) to my ISP over eth0 via the DSL modem/bridge. My IPv4 CIDR block is routing and Shorewall is doing the firewalling. But shorewall has to be started after ppp0 is up and working. For now this means running shorewall restart (or start?). Shorewall 4.2 will have a way to restart shorewall without recompiling, I

That could have gone smoother. I had many problems with the NFS install on my firewall then once I got the server back up, mail delivery was broken :- ( I still haven''t gotten ulogd to run under RH9.0 but everything else seems to be working ok... -Tom -- Tom Eastep \ Shorewall - iptables made easy Shoreline, \ http://www.shorewall.net Washington USA \ teastep@shorewall.net

ehlo list, I''m willing to shape ppp users e.g. each pppX interface to get XXX kbits I classify traffic going to ppp+ interfaces like this: iptables -t mangle -A POSTROUTING -o ppp+ -j CLASSIFY --set-class 0002:0020 then i have a file which is executed when a ppp inteface is up and first argument parsed to that file ($1) is the ppp number (e.g. 35 for ppp35). it generally looks like

I''ve installed Shorewall 3.0.5 on a Debian Sarge box, and I''m attempting to route internet traffic through a couple of ISPs, and I''ve come up against some problems. The first is that one of my links is a pppoe connection to a wireless modem, and I can''t configure it to have a static IP address... therefore I can''t see how I can set up the two

Hello all, I am still reading about my QoS rules and I need that one of my servers (that is into my LAN but has an routing ip address) did not get into the qos rules I have. So I want that all traffic coming or going to that specifc host did not get shapped by any traffic control and do not get even into a QoS class. How can I do this? Att, Nataniel Klug

Hello, My system is: Server with Slackware 8.1 LINUX, ADSL Internet with PPPoE connection, and I masquerade my LAN. I use "Roaring Penguin" PPPoE client for my ADSL connection. I would like to connect another ADSL line (also PPPoE) to my server and have two lines, because I want to make "Simple source policy routing", as described in LARTC HOWTO. How should I set up my

Some of Shorewall''s features manipulate routing tables. Linux removes routes involving interfaces that disappear (namely pppX). When these interfaces are restore the routing tables are not restored. Just wondering how people are dealing with this situation.

Hello I am using htb (krenel 2.6.14.3 + esfq patch from fatooh.org) to limit the bandwidth. But I want the absolute maximum rate to be for example 5Mbit and not to exceed it. here is the script: $tc qdisc add dev ${NETIF} root handle 1 htb r2q 4 $tc class add dev ${NETIF} parent 1: classid 1:21 htb rate 5Mbit ceil 5Mbit $tc class add dev ${NETIF} parent 1:21 classid 1:101 htb rate 2Mbit ceil

I have three ADSL lines that I''d like to use as one big pipe to the internet. The ADSL service works by establishing a pppoe connection (the ADSL "modem" is a bridge), and each pppoe interface gets its own IP address. This means I''d have to have 4 ethernet interfaces (3 for each of the ADSL modems and 1 for the LAN) in my gateway. I''d setup the gateway to NAT

I am using tbf to do bandwidth limitation. i found that when i start passing traffic there is a burst and then the rate goes down to what is configured. is this a known issue or do i need to change some parameters? thanks. --------------------------------- Do you Yahoo!? Read only the mail you want - Yahoo! Mail SpamGuard. _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list

Hi I want to block the IP traffic between any 2 hosts on a switched ethernet LAN. Will setting all the possible IP addresses on a linux machine in the LAN do the trick or there is another easier solution? -- Anton Glinkov network administrator _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO:

OK, I''m stumped. I''ve read through most of the LARTC HOWTO and have yet to find a basis for what I need to accomplish. I have a Linux box that controls access to and from the Internet at my workplace. We have a number of remote employees that connect via PPTP and IPSEC to the office''s internal network. Some of these remote employees are currently using SIP phones.