similar to: Htb queueing problem

Could someone comment on the benefits of using CLASSIFY vs fwmark (or vice versa) in iptables? I''m getting ready to implement some basic tc for VoIP and most of the examples seem to use the (older?) fwmark syntax. Should I convert these to CLASSIFY? Can the two syntaxes be mixed? Also with U32? TIA, Edwin -- <=+=+=+==+=+=+==+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=> Edwin Whitelaw, P.E. New River

Happy New Year. Finally got my fw and tc rules down pat for the bridge, now interested in introducing a third nic to have nat on the box as well. Does anyone have a idea of a good place to start reading up on the subject, mainly interested in how to setup the flow direction to start with as to get a overall understanding of the flow, found that help best. Internet --- eth0 --- eth1 ---

Hello... Im trying to setup HTB to allow me to shape traffic from two upstreams that meets on single lan0 interface. I prefer to use HTB qdisc within HTB root qdisc for cleaner rules design. Seems that it doesnt work at all. tc -s class show doesnt show any traffic on other classes attached to HTB qdisc. Linux 2.6.20.7 iproute-2.6.20-070313 Weird thing is that tc -s class show that 1: and 2:

Hello. I''m running linux box with Slackware 9.1 and compiled kernel 2.4.31 with "yes" to VLANs and "yes" to all QoS. On this box i have more ethernet interfaces: eth0 eth1 eth2 and so as more vlan interfaces: eth0.100 eth1.3 eth1.4 This is entrace(uplink) router to our whole network and my goal is to shape users on this machine. I want for this purpose use HTB so

I have htb on 486 sx with 16mb ram. Slackware 9.1. Connection : dsl 1Mbit. 486 works as router and trafic shaper for network made of 12 pc''s. it does the job quite well, but when i play Counter-Strike or connect to my 486 via ssh (on lan), i get huge lag every 11-20 sec. when i connect to 486 via ssh and run iptraf program i see all the trafic, and after a while when lag comes the

Hi,lartc I used iproute-060110 with iptables1.3.4 on gentoo 2005r1 kernel 2.6.14-5. I find some error messages in system logfile: HTB: quantum of class 10001 is big. Consider r2q change. HTB: quantum of class 10010 is big. Consider r2q change. tcf_action_init_1: successfull police HTB: quantum of class 20001 is big. Consider r2q change. HTB: quantum of class 20020 is big. Consider

Hello...I have a Slackware based machine doing routing & QoS for my internal LAN users... It has two interfaces: eth1(100mbps) that connects to the aDSL modem(USR 9105) and eth0(100mbps) that connects to my local LAN... I''am using shorewall as a firewall...i think it''s configured well as it''s working as i want and i pass all the online firewall tests... :D All lan

Hi! I recently changed my qdisc from CBQ and PRIO to only HTB, and I can''t really seem to get the rates to work as I want them to. I have eight classes, which I set up as follows: tc qdisc add dev eth1 root handle 1: htb default 122 tc class add dev eth1 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 1000kbit ceil 1000kbit cburst 1500 burst 50kb tc class add dev eth1 parent 1:1 classid 1:11 htb prio 0

I thought that the below email would be of interest to LARTC readers. I wasted quite a bit of time tracking down this "feature" (bug?). Any comments that shed light on this would be appreciated. In short, "tc filter" + htb + bridging works only with ip_forward off. Andrew Athan ----------------------------------------------------------------------- All: It seems that

Hi Stef, Sorry to write to you directly but my list membership is not working, I receive the archive but cant send to the list, cant delete myself because I don''t exist and can''t rejoin as they say I do exist, anyway hope you don''t mind Can you tell me what the difference between these two scripts is please. What I want to achieve is a high speed channel 1000kbit from

Hi, I have some interesting problem with htb , I set up root class and sub-classess: $TC qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: htb $TC class add dev eth0 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 1990kbit ceil 2000kbit $TC class add dev eth0 parent 1:1 classid 1:10 htb rate 190kbit ceil 200kbit $TC class add dev eth0 parent 1:1 classid 1:11 htb rate 1400kbit ceil 1600kbit $TC class add dev eth0 parent 1:1

My hfsc rule .. tc qdisc add dev eth2 handle 1: root hfsc iptables -t mangle -N ms-all iptables -t mangle -N ms-all-chains iptables -t mangle -N ms-prerouting iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -j ms-prerouting iptables -t mangle -A ms-prerouting -j CONNMARK --restore-mark iptables -t mangle -A ms-prerouting -p udp --dport 4444 -j MARK --set-mark 1 iptables -t mangle -A ms-prerouting -p udp -m

Hi, everyone I has a ADSL link about 4M bandwidth, and use HTB do bandwidth management. When I config qdisc like below: tc qdisc add dev br0 root handle 1: htb default 30 tc class add dev br0 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 4000kbit tc class add dev br0 parent 1:1 classid 1:10 htb rate 2000kbit ceil 4000kbit prio 0 tc class add dev br0 parent 1:1 classid 1:20 htb rate 1000kbit ceil 4000kbit

Hi All I am fighting this for 3 days and could not find any reason it is not working the way I want to (or I the way think it should). Internet output interface = eth2 (htb qdisc) Internet input interface = imq0 (eth2 attached - htb qdisc) main class = imq0 1:1 sub1 = 1:ffff (default) sub2 = 1:10 (src ports 1433/tcp or 1434/tcp or 81/tcp or 82/tcp) sub3 = 1:11 (src and dst port 25/tcp )

For some time now im trying to get to know what causes such configuration of QOS (kernel 2.4.25-2.4.28 + IMQ patch and ofcourse wrr): -- WRR_MAX_CLASSES=200 DEV_IN=imq0 ifconfig $DEV_IN down ifconfig $DEV_IN up tc qdisc add dev ${DEV_IN} handle 1:0 root htb default 10 tc class add dev ${DEV_IN} parent 1:0 classid 1:10 htb rate 1000kbit burst 1kbit prio 1 tc qdisc add dev ${DEV_IN} parent 1:10

Having a problem with classid and prio and position. Wondering if someone could help? Below I have pasted a part of my current rules, now it consists of one chain and two pipes. If they both use 60Kbit which one would get priority? Would it be the one with the better prio or the one with the lower classid or would it be the one which is first on the list? /sbin/tc class add dev eth1 parent

Hi, this is my Linux Box ---------------------------- LAN 1 -----|--eth1 <---br1--->eth0.1 | | \ | | eth0--|----- 802.1q tagged 1 Mbps link | / | LAN 2 -----|--eth2 <---br2--->eth0.2 | ---------------------------- I have to bridge the 2 lans

Hi, this is a followup to "Problem with HTB and ceil", the problem with the ceiling has been resolved, thanks to the memebers on this m/g. Now I have the problem that packets get into the correct classe with the correct marks but the prios are not respected. I have 4 different classes: 1. voip class / prio 0 / mark 100 / voip traffic 2. ACK class / prio 1 / mark 200 / ACK packets to

Hello everyone, First of all, sorry for my poor english. I''ve been working with this for a few weeks and I''m getting sick... I''m trying to control the bandwith in my network using the following script. The machine where the script is running makes NAT, eth0 is connected to the router and eth1 is connected to the Lan. When I run the script it doesn''t appear any

Hi all, I''m trying to marking packets with iptables and use tc filter to catch this packets. I configure my device: tc qdisc del root dev eth0 tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: htb default 10 tc class add dev eth0 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 3000kbit ceil 6000kbit burst 15k tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:1 classid 1:10 htb rate 2000kbit ceil 4000kbit burst 15k tc qdisc add dev eth0