similar to: Trying to do some very simple ingress limiting, no success

On 2/19/07, Salatiel Filho <salatiel.filho@gmail.com> wrote: > Well , thanks to imq all my client machines are now shaped and > everything is great ... > But now i have a doubt , is there a way to shape the traffic that goes > to the route [doing a wget from the router for example ]? > > > I have a PREROUTING IMQ0 and a POSTROUTING IMQ1 , everything is > working like

Hi, I''m looking for info about IFB devices and how I can use it to incomming traffic shapping. Has IFB any web about it? Do any body known where I can find more info about it? I found this: http://linux-net.osdl.org/index.php/IFB But I can''t stand fine how to use it to allow many ifb''s devices or how to use it with "tc actions". Any help? Thanks --

How to use IFB as replacement of IMQ There is not much documentation about it Please explain with example -- Failure seldom stops you. What stops you is the fear of failure. _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc

Hi, My problem is following now: I would like to set the filters for port 8099. I have tried it, but nothing happened. When I try the same filter for the port 8080 it is working very well. .) working filter (here I can see the dropped packages): tc filter add dev eth0 parent ffff: protocol ip u32 match ip dport 8080 0xffff police rate 1kbit burst 1 drop flowid :1 .) not working filter (here I

I''m trying to setup traffic shaping on my linux gateway/router. The system has 3 interfaces: eth0 - My LAN - with IP address 192.168.0.254 eth1 - The ethernet connection to which my ADSL modem is connected. This has a 10.25.x.x IP, more on this later. The ADSL link has an upstream of ~1.2mbit. ppp0 - The PPP connection which is my WAN connection, with a real world IP. The system acts

Is it possible to negate the "match" to the ip? I want to match all traffic to dport 80 NOT going to dst 1.2.3.4: $TC filter add dev ${DEV_IFB} parent 1:0 prio 2 protocol ip u32 \ match ip protocol 0x6 0xff \ match ip dport 80 0xffff \ match ip dst 1.2.3.4/32 \ classid 1:14 I can''t find it in the docs. I tried "!" "\!" and "not" in several

Server : eth0 - internet DSL eth1 - LAN wlan0 - wireles LAN I want server to share bandwith from eth0 evenly for users on eth1 and wlan0. How can i make it ? Is it possible ? As far as i know htb splits outgoing bandwith on one device only. ---------------------------------------------------- Grypa? Damy radę! Sprawdź jak jej zapowbiegać, a jeśli już za późno ...jak leczyć - grypa.wp.pl

ingress can be used to control the incoming packet, such as: tc qdisc add dev eth0 handle ffff: ingress tc filter add dev eth0 parent ffff: protocol ip prio 5 u32 match ip src 172.16.1.11 police rate 10kbit burst 10k drop flowid :1 tc filter add dev eth0 parent ffff: protocol ip prio 5 u32 match ip src 172.16.1.22 police rate 10kbit burst 10k drop flowid :2 first ,I do not sure these method can

Hello! My goal is to setup an ingress traffic shaping on my PPPOE DSL line with ifb. My old imq stuff used iptables marks (like ''iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -p tcp --sport 22 -m length --length :500 -j MARK --set-mark 31'') to classify the traffic and since i am lazy, i tried to to reuse them with ifb. But no luck: iptables marks the packets well, but tc

Is IFB realy replacement of IMQ Please Guide -- Failure seldom stops you. What stops you is the fear of failure. _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc

Hello, I just found the great howto and started shaping my internet connection. The howto''s last update is a liitle in the past now so I have some questions about how things are done the best way nowadays ;-) To ensure a stable and low latency voip communication I added an HFSC qdisc to device ppp0 (1 Mbit SDSL). There are two classes (by now): One for SIP and RTP and one for the

Hi, I find this diagram which details the kernel packet traveling : http://www.docum.org/docum.org/kptd/ Is it up to date ? I made some test and I put a DNAT rules in the PREROUTING table of an interface and I attach it a ingress policy, the dst IP wasn''t changed. the DNAT it isn''t yet make. I''ve another question (I''m not sure is it the good mailing list), for

Hi everyone, I have a small problem. I have my debian server setup in my home. I have setup htb that is working perfectly. The only problem I have is to control the traffic server <-> internet I have a daemon (bittorrent) and I would like to limit its download to a certail amount. How can I do that ? I have tried layer7 but it seems I''m doing something wrong in the htb script.

Hi, Has anyone used TC in a wireless environment, which is dynamic. I understand that the parameters for queuing are static and cannot be changed unless the queuing discipline is deleted and reloaded with different parameters. If anyone can share any experience, that would be helpful. Thanx. Azim. _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl

On a router, there is no need for and IMQ because there is always an egress path. For example: Internet -> eth1 -> iptables -> routing -> ... -> egress qdisc -> eth0 -> LAN LAN -> eth0 -> iptables -> routing -> .... -> egress qdisc -> eth1 -> Internet Local Process / Proxy -> routing -> iptables -> egress qdisc -> eth1/eth0 ->

Hello, I am using the following iptables POSTROUTING rule to NAT some RFC 1918 addresses: iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -s 192.168.19.23 ! 192.168.0.0/255.255.0.0 -p tcp --dport 80 -j SNAT --to-source 10.32.4.2 (I am using SNAT instead of MASQUERADE for performance reasons). I have several addresses on the 192.168.0.0/16 subnet that I am SNAT''ing similarly. Problem is, ''tc

I have two interfaces, eth0 and eth1 but i can''t discern the egress traffic than ingress traffic. I need to apply htb qdisc in both directions, and I read that I need the IMQ patch to do this, because in ingress qdisc i can''t apply htb qdisc...but where is the ingress qdisc? affect the traffic that goes from eth0 to eth1 or is for the traffic that goes from eth1 to eth0?

Hi all, Another requirement we have is that traffic entering the DS domain be classified then subsequently assigned a (different?) DSCP based upon its classification. For illustrative purposes only let''s say (for traffic entering the DS domain on dev eth0): - WWW traffic would be marked BE - traffic destined for 10.10.10.10 would be marked AF11 - VoIP traffic from 20.20.20.20 would

Hello I''m trying to switch from IMQ to IFB but I have a problem with traffic marked by ipp2p module. Looks like when traffic is redirected from ethX to ifbX it looses information about MARK. Here''s what I do to get ingress traffic to go to ifb interface: $TC qdisc add dev eth1.42 ingress $TC filter add dev eth1.42 parent ffff: protocol ip prio 10 u32 \ match u32 0 0

On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 6:06 AM, Qiu Yu <unicell@gmail.com> wrote: > After some digging in openvswitch code. My wild guess is that vlan tag > reconfiguring triggered iface_configure_qos (vswitchd/bridge.c), which > in turn called netdev_set_policing to reset ingress policing rate. > Although there's no ingress_policing_rate set in my case, existing > ingress qdisc still