similar to: u32 and iptables do not work together

Hello all, I have set my QoS solution and now I am facing a little problem... When I ping to my server it has some lost packages: Estatísticas do Ping para 172.30.0.1: Pacotes: SENDED = 1029, RETURNED = 880, LOST = 149 (14% de perda), Aproximar um número redondo de vezes em milissegundos: Mínimo = 0ms, Máximo = 686ms, Média = 105ms If I disable my QoS ping stats to be ok. I even have

Hello all, I am trying to match some conections using u32 but I tryed this: [root@ns1 ~]# tc filter add dev eth1 parent 1:0 protocol ip prio 1 u32 match ip src 0/0 match ip dst 0/0 match ip sport 80 0xffff flowid 1:10 RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument We have an error talking to the kernel [root@ns1 ~]# I have this class at device eth1: [root@ns1 ~]# tc class show dev eth1 class

Hello all, I am trying to configure a linux box to make some QoS into my netowork and, at the same box, control my clients bandwidth. I have this classes created: ---------------------------------------------------------------- UP="eth0" # wan infocontabil DL01="eth2" # lan clientes $TC qdisc del dev $DL01 root 2> /dev/null >

Hello all, As I have promised I am sending my QoS rules. This now works fine with u32 classifier (and parent 1:0 that I could not understand why it did not worked well before). Att, Nataniel Klug ------------------------ #!/bin/sh #------ # Script de QoS Cyber Nett #------ # Nataniel Klug # suporte@cnett.com.br #------ TC="/sbin/tc" IPT="/usr/local/sbin/iptables"

Hello all, I am trying to make a little bit more complex QoS/Shapping form and I need to shape a PPPoE conection that I serve to my clients. So this is the scope: client connects using pppoe so it gets an IP address (from pppoe pool) and open an interface into my linux box interface for this client is ppp0 client has got an ip 1.1.1.2/32 and it is poiting to pppoe-server 1.1.1.1 So,

Hi All, I''ve got an interoffice IPSEC VPN in place that I''m trying to give priority to terminal service (tcp 3389) traffic. I''ve created rules at each end, but have hit a bit of a dillemma. As the data is encrypted I must also give highest priority to protocol 50 otherwise the priority is lost as the packet gets encrypted. When I do this however, I can''t

I have 1 100MB NIC with two 2MB-subnets trough a router behind it. I''d like to create multiple default classes: 1: + |\_ 1:10 default, ceiling 100000kbit, rate 96000kbit | |\_ 1:11 ceiling 2048kbit, rate 2048kbit | | | |\_1:110 ceiling 2048kbit, rate 1536kbit | \_1:111 ceiling 2048kbit, rate 512kbit (default subnet1) | \_ 1:12 ceiling 2048kbit, rate

Hi, I found that I had some thinking error with the wshaper script. I assigned the bandwith of my DSL connection to it, but the machine where it runs is normally connected to the LAN with 100Mbit behind a separate Hardware-Router.Obviously, the complete connection of the machine was slowed down to 384k because I told it so.I guess, since wshaper takes only one card as argument, I can''t

I thought that the below email would be of interest to LARTC readers. I wasted quite a bit of time tracking down this "feature" (bug?). Any comments that shed light on this would be appreciated. In short, "tc filter" + htb + bridging works only with ip_forward off. Andrew Athan ----------------------------------------------------------------------- All: It seems that

How can i redirect all traffic that not come from port 80 to a flow ? i was thing about some like tc filter add dev imq1 parent 1: protocol ip prio 7 u32 match ip sport !80 ...... But this not work. Another doubt, if i have two rules that intersects , for example , one filter with u32 match ip src 10.10.10.10 flowid 1:10 and other with u32 match sport 80 0xffff flowid 1:11 , which one will

I am using a server with asterisk and I am trying to prioritize voip traffick -- I am a newbie at this traffic shaping, so please bear with me. I used the script below and what happens is thatall traffic in the bulk class stops after a couple of minutes. Also, should I include the ports for rtp in the filter statements with the ports 5061 and 4569? Note I have a fairly big pipe -- supposed to

I''m streaming audio over a WAN that is 1.5Mbit/s. The audio has to go both ways and can be over tcp or udp. The manufacturers recommend udp as it has less overhead but has a higher chance of dropping out. The audio requires 130-200kbit/s in each direction for a combined 260-400kbit/s. I have two transparent bridges on either side of the WAN to do traffic control. I split it so

As seen on my post at: http://www.sveasoft.com/modules/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?p=28112#28112 This works very well... It does NOT work with stable 4.0! sveasoft will be issuing a bug fix for this (4.1) in the near future. Final Rev of working script w/ asterisk support I'm not going to run alchemy on production machines until it is stablish. Remember to set your uplink properly and to set

Hi all, I am running Slackware 10.1 with Kernel 2.6.14.3 includes iptables 1.3.4 with layer 7 My network diagram below: - INTERNET --- LINUX_ROUTER_FW --- PCs Below is my simple iptables script: - echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -o eth0 -j MASQUERADE iptables -t mangle -A POSTROUTING -m layer7 --l7proto applejuice -j MARK --set-mark 1 iptables -t

Hi everybody, i am new to this list so dont blame me if i will talk about nothing.. At this moment i am experimenting with htb + tc u32 filters , the problem is that i want some traffic to be unshaped so i did this.. tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 10: htb default 20 tc class add dev eth0 parent 10: classid 10:2 htb rate 256Kbit THIS IS TRAFFIC I WANT NOT TO BE SHAPED tc filter add dev eth0

Hello everyone! I''m simply trying to put a PRIO inside an HTB (used to throttle). I''ve got interactive traffic on the network that I want to give priority (VoIP + Citrix + Video). I''ve used the filters in a CBQ script fine, but am having trouble adjusting them to this setup such that they properly assign the traffic. tc qdisc del root dev $e tc qdisc add dev $e

Hi all :) I''m new to this list, as I''m new too to traffic shaping ;) I''ve set up an FTP server in my ADSL line and I wanted it to serve as fast as possible as long as I don''t use my outgoing ADSL bandwidth, and I''m currently using HTB for that (succesfully, I must add). The problem is (when the FTP server is serving higher than its

Hi, I am attempting to set up some simple outbound shaping following the LARTC HOWTO. The HTB qdisc seems to work as the documentation says, but my filters don''t seem to be working. All of the packets go to the default queue regardless of what filters I set, it seems. (according to tc -s qdisc show) I am trying to get this working on my openwrt box (whiterussian rc6), but when

Hi everyone, I am having problems with "oopses" since I introduced HTB on my company''s PC-based routers. It seems that only routers with high network load are affected. The average network load on the two most problematic routers are 10Mbps in/out and 2.5Mbps in/out. The other machines with less than 1Mbps average traffic seems unaffected. We have been getting oopses on

Le 26 juil. 07 à 13:55, Georgi Alexandrov a écrit : > Vincent Dautremont wrote: > >> Hi, >> here I have another newcomer question :-) >> in the section 9.6.1 of this how too >> http://tldp.org/HOWTO/Adv-Routing-HOWTO/lartc.qdisc.filters.html >> we can read commands about filters : >> ------------------------------------------ >> >> # tc