similar to: acts_as_paranoid --> undefined method `constrain' for class `Class'

I have a real problem with the acts_as_paranoid plugin. The aliasing of find and so the nested scope does not seem to work at all, when combining it with similar plugins. The description: I made a copy of ''acts_as_paranoid'' in the plugin directory, renamed it to ''acts_as_very_new''(just a nonsense plugin for testing), and simplified the code (original code

I have a real problem with the acts_as_paranoid plugin. The find-scope nesting does not seem to work at all. The description: I made a copy of ''acts_as_paranoid'' in the plugin directory, renamed it to ''acts_as_very_new''(just nonsense plugin for testing), and just simplified the code: #-------------------------------------------------------------- module

I''m running 0.14.2 and am a little confused as to the best way to install mix-ins. I''m specifically using "acts_as_paranoid" as an example (as it is one of the simpler implementations). It is a gem and can be "installed" as a gem, but then what''s the best way to integrate it into my app (require_gem?). I''ve seen recommendations to require it

Will the find from acts_as_paranoid filter down to an :include? For instance class parent acts_as_paranoid has_many: children end and class child acts_as_paranoid belongs_to :parent end Then if you Parent.find(:all, :include => children) you will get all the children if they are deleted or not. I guess the find that filters out the deleted_at is null does not filter down to the includes

Here''s the full error: 1) Error: test_add_message_to_existing_ticket(TicketTest): ArgumentError: Unknown key(s): group /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activesupport-1.2.4/lib/active_support/core_ext/hash/keys.rb:48:in `assert_valid_keys'' /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/acts_as_paranoid-0.2/lib/acts_as_paranoid.rb:125:in `validate_find_options''

I''ve got a problem in that users are deleting a paranoid model through the application, including dependents. Some of these dependents are paranoid too, but not the attachments. (I''m using DB file storage.) I need to be able to un-delete these things and I''m now wondering if acts_as_paranoid will work with models that use attachment_fu? If so, in what model to I add the

Guys, I am trying to figure out what exactly does this line do at the end of "acts_as_paranoid" plugin? ActiveRecord::Base.send :include, Caboose::Acts::Paranoid::ActiveRecord My problem: I have some classes that I use acts_as_paranoid, and others with tagging support. Classes declared as taggable, throw error, which appears to be in the acts_as_paranoid version of the

Acts_as_paranoid is giving me a headache when performing migrations. For some reason when I perform a migration I get a "stack level too deep" error. If I comment out the database inserts that are performed (countries, regions, and a base admin) it works well. Even after minimizing the data that is inserted on the migration to one record it still throws the same error. When running

Hi, I''ve run into two small problems with acts_as_paranoid and wondered if anyone else has experienced them as well (and if yes, if they have any solutions). 1. When using has_many :through, AAP doesn''t seem to take into account the fact that your join model might also be paranoid. My solution to this at the moment is to add an explicit conditions clause to the has_many

Trying this straight from the README: I have acts_as_paranoid in my model (Course), and added the deleted_at column. This is OK: Course.find_with_deleted(:all) Course.find(:all, :with_deleted => true) gives: ArgumentError: Unknown key(s): with_deleted from /opt/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activesupport-2.0.2/lib/ active_support/core_ext/hash/keys.rb:49:in `assert_valid_keys''

Hi! I''m trying to extend ActiveRecord''s find method (Rails 1.0, Ruby 1.8.2), but I recognize a strange behaviour of the "alias_method" call. I wrote a very simple script to explain my problem: ------------------------------------------------------ module ActiveRecordExtension def self.included(base) base.extend(ClassMethods) base.class_eval do

HI all, I just started using acts_as_paranoid, and I''ve been using gettext for a while. Now I get the below errors when I run rake gettext:updatepo. It''s interesting that the errors seem to stack up, so the first file just errors on belongs_to_without_deleted, the second file has a layer of eval, the second has two layers of eval, and so forth. I''ve tried for a while

hello, I''m using the trunk versions of both plugins. I''m running into this error when I run a migration to try and create the versioned table for the model ''Note'' stack level too deep /Users/Adam/dev/sweetspot/app/trunk/config/../vendor/plugins/ acts_as_paranoid/init.rb:5:in `belongs_to_without_deleted''

when i require acts_as_paranoid I''m getting: undefined method `alias_method_chain'' for #<Class:ActiveRecord::Base> (NoMethodError) It happens in acts_as_paranoid''s init.rb. here''s the whole file. the alias_method_chain is near the bottom. please advise. class << ActiveRecord::Base def belongs_to_with_deleted(association_id, options = {})

Using the acts_as_paranoid plugin with rails 1.1.4 (model also uses acts_as_threaded and acts_as_taggable) and getting some unexplainable behavior. The following tests: assert_equal Conv.count, num assert_equal Conv.count_with_deleted, CONVS_TOTAL Produce the following SQL: SQL (0.000000) SELECT count(*) AS count_all FROM convs WHERE (( convs.deleted_at IS NULL OR convs.deleted_at

Hi all, Ran in to a problem with AR::B#find(:include) and acts_as_paranoid, well described here: http://www.ruby-forum.com/topic/57945 So I whipped up this thing, which seems to work for me: module ActiveRecord class Base def self.has_one_paranoid(*args) ref = create_has_one_reflection *args cond = args.last[:conditions] cond = cond.blank? ? '''' : cond

Hi... Isn''t there a proper way or hack/workaround for the following? * For the example with unfortunate disabilities.. look below,,, Usage of has_* (associationmethods) do {def with_deleted AccociatedModel#with_scope} {Paranoid''s#find_with_deleted}... The has_one associations give me a nil object when invoking it with Model.association_OBJECT.with_deleted. Has_many does like

Is it possible with acts_as_ferret to somehow restrict the results that are returned? For instance, I don''t want to return results that are logically deleted with acts_as_paranoid (deleted_at IS NOT NULL and deleted_at < now()). Also, if a user is not an Admin, they should not be able to return results that have a certain value in a certain column, like forum_id != 13 (if 13 is

Hello I''ve been using Acts_as_Parnoid for a while and it has been working well but I am now having a slight issue with it. I have a company table were I would like to use validates_uniqueness_of :company_name. This validation works if a company exists in the database and has not been deleted. However, I also would like the validates_uniqueness_of to work if a company has

Hi, I had created a new environment and tried to start the webrick server for that environment but it is giving an error:- E:/demo/vendor/rails/railties/lib/commands/servers/ webrick.rb:11: warning: already initialized constant OPTIONS E:/demo/vendor/rails/activesupport/lib/active_suppo rt/dependencies.rb:249:in `load_missing_constant'': Expected E:/Demo