similar to: Multiple WAN + Multiple LAN + linux-igd

Hello Tom, I tried the new UPnP support of shorewall, olny to stumble upon a LinuxIGD bug. Specificaly, the UPnP chain is read as UPn from the upnpd.conf . I double checked it, there some bug in the upnpd, it doesn''t process 4 lettered names correctly. Could you change this chains'' name to something a little longer? -- Costas Cavouracis <cca@freemail.gr> My PGP keys:

Hi, I''m trying let the windows clients behind my leaf ( bering rc4) talk through msn messenger. I found linux-igd.sourceforge.net that seems to be the missing piece... I used the ideas from www.wix.net.nz/LEAF/glibc.html to build a leaf cd using the redhat 7.3 glibc ( It''s alot easier to test applications because I can simply copy the binary ( and the .so) on the bering

ClarkConnect Home 3.2 eth0 - WAN - inet - ip:192.168.1.2 gw:192.168.1.1 (connected to my www.woosh.co.nz gatway) wlan - WAN - private community wireless networt - ip:10.252.16.16 gw:10.252.16.1 eth1 - LAN - ip:192.168.2.1 # route add -net 10.0.0.0 netmask 255.0.0.0 gw 10.252.16.1 [root@bowenvale etc]# route Kernel IP routing table Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface

Hi all, I''ve a routing problem. I''m setting up a router based on debian (kernel 2.4). I need to setup routing to export an ftp service (ftp server is in dmz) to 2 wan (both). I setup prerouting ad forward rule with no problem. The problem is that reply packet use default gateway (default wan) even though they are enter using the other wan. I solved it marking packets in input

Hi, could anyone provides any example about the use of ip route command to force the use of one route using masks in the mark? The configuration is: 1 LAN (zlan0) iface N WAN (wan0 ... wanN) ifaces with static IPs and load balanced. iptables 1.3.7 kernel 2.6.19.2 iproute 2.6.19 I''m yet setting marks into packets for QoS and its working, I now want to set some bits (OR)

Fancy, while not fun. :-) But thanks, that does work. Doing that, n?ing over calls to strcmp, it failed: passdbs_init () at passdb.c:313 313 passdb_register_module(&passdb_ldap); (gdb) passdb_register_module (iface=0x280120) at passdb.c:33 33 old_iface = passdb_interface_find(iface->name); (gdb) passdb_interface_find (name=0x16fe60 "ldap") at passdb.c:20 20

Hi, I have a linux box which balances load between two interfaces ( say WAN1 and WAN2). I have masquerading on for any request coming from LAN to the outside world. The setup is in such a way that WAN1 drops packets with source ip belonging to WAN2''s network and viceversa. For some strange reason, I find that packet coming out from the WAN interface has source address of WAN2 and

Hi - I have shorewall-1.3.8-1 on a RH 7.3 machine that acts as a firewall for my network. It was running the other day just fine, but today I have problems getting to the firewall. It is a frame-relay network with Cisco routers. Everything is 192.168.x.x / 24. I can''t ping the firewall from the WAN, but can from the main LAN. Sounds like a routing issue to me, but it was working for

On 5/10/2021 1:33 PM, Chuck Zmudzinski wrote: > Package: src:linux > Version: 5.10.28-1 > Severity: normal > Tags: upstream > > Dear Maintainer, > > I have been using Xen's PCI and VGA passthrough feature since wheezy and jessie were the stable versions, and back then both Windows HVMs and Linux HVMs would function with the Intel Integrated Graphics Device (IGD), the

Ok ive been trying to get this to work for about half a year now. Ive searched all over the internet for a solution for my problem. Ive found some solutions, but they only led me to yet more problems. What we want to do is the following: I live in a student complex with 7 other people. Every room has its own internet connection from the same ISP. Ip, gateway, subnet are asigned through dhcp on

Hi! On 10/19/21 5:44 AM, Chuck Zmudzinski wrote: > On 5/10/2021 1:33 PM, Chuck Zmudzinski wrote: >> [...] with buster and bullseye running as the Dom0, I can only get the VGA/Passthrough feature to work with Windows Xen HVMs. I would expect both Windows and Linux HVMs to work comparably well. You don't mention the used Xen version (Debian package version) for buster and bullseye

Hi, I have just applied IGD VGA Passthrough patches to Xen 4.4-unstable changeset 27238. Please refer to the 2 attached patches. 1. [Xen-devel] [PATCH 2/3] V4 qemu-xen-trad: Correctly expose PCH ISA bridge for IGD passthrough Link: http://lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2013-06/msg01720.html 2. [Xen-devel] [PATCH 3/3] qemu-xen-trad: IGD passthrough: Expose vendor specific pci

Hi, I have just applied IGD VGA Passthrough patches to Xen 4.4-unstable changeset 27238. Please refer to the 2 attached patches. 1. [Xen-devel] [PATCH 2/3] V4 qemu-xen-trad: Correctly expose PCH ISA bridge for IGD passthrough Link: http://lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2013-06/msg01720.html 2. [Xen-devel] [PATCH 3/3] qemu-xen-trad: IGD passthrough: Expose vendor specific pci

Hi, I''m using HTB for bandwidth control, but i''m still not sure how to account the traffic. My config is the following: eth0 goes to internet and eth1 to the clients(I''m shaping both ifaces). I want to log ip traffic from and to the clients. Since htb shapes outgoing traffic I''m not sure how to make the iptables script. This is the script: ${IPTABLES} -N

On 10/23/2021 11:11 AM, Hans van Kranenburg wrote: > Hi! > > On 10/19/21 5:44 AM, Chuck Zmudzinski wrote: >> On 5/10/2021 1:33 PM, Chuck Zmudzinski wrote: >>> [...] with buster and bullseye running as the Dom0, I can only get the VGA/Passthrough feature to work with Windows Xen HVMs. I would expect both Windows and Linux HVMs to work comparably well. > You don't

Hello, I have this message in syslog that I'd like to ignore: === Apr 5 15:31:37 server77 upnpd[11728]: TimerThreadRemove failed! === I use these rules to ignore it in a file located in ignore.d.server (which contains some other rules which work): === ^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ upnpd\[[0-9]+\]: TimerThreadRemove failed!$ ^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+

http://shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/2.2/shorewall-2.2.4 ftp://shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/2.2/shorewall-2.2.4 Problems Corrected: 1. The error message: Error: No appropriate chain for zone <z1> to zone <z2> has been changed to one that is more self-explanatory: Error: No policy defined for zone <z1> to zone <z2> 2. When only an

Hi, I've been using CentOS & Xen on a server that has 2 VM's configured. The default configuration includes one physical iface that is propagated (by a default bridge) to the VM's. Since I wanted to configure additional physical iface, define a new bridge and propagate it to the viface-s of the VM's, i configured the bridge/phys. iface and brought it up (here are

Hi all! I have quation: how i may use nested variables/facts? For example, I have variable $iface. It''s variable declared in node brakets, and, use with defenition. iface may be eth0, eth1(Linux), em0, ... <freebsd>, ... is fact: facter | grep eth0 | grep mac macaddress_eth0 => 54:52:00:3D:CB:40 We don''nt know name of $iface in our module (to generate network

Can someone help me with this problem: My host on the DMZ is inaccessible from the WAN on port 25. I tried to telnet but getting: $ telnet 66.58.99.84 25 Trying 66.58.99.84... telnet: Unable to connect to remote host: No route to host My shorewall/proxyarp is: #address interface external haveroute 66.58.99.82 eth1 eth0 No 66.58.99.84 eth1