similar to: Logging dropped out-of-sequence packets on a load balanced router

Hi everybody, I want to do the following setup : | | Tun1 - Link 1 | Tun1 | | Router A | teql | INTERNET Link - | | teql |router B | | Tun2 - Link 2 | Tun2 | | This should permit to agregate Link 1 and Link 2 (less the cost of the encapsulation). The two tunnels are GRE ip tunnel. It seems to work fine

hi i am running Debian/GNU Linux with 2.4.26 kernel and radius server my kernel conf looks like this <*> Packet socket [ ] Packet socket: mmapped IO < > Netlink device emulation [*] Network packet filtering (replaces ipchains) [*] Network packet filtering debugging [ ] Socket Filtering <*> Unix domain sockets [*] TCP/IP networking [*] IP: multicasting [*] IP: advanced

Dear List, Another noob question today! I''ve been using iproute2 for a long time now to manage bandwidth and directing traffic over multiple interfaces based on source routing. I am working on a test-project at the moment, in witch I want to actually bundle (''trunk'') some connections. In the LARTC-manual I found the chapter about TEQL (see chapter 10). The situation

Thanks in advance! Summary: when I load netem and teql together, teql doesn''t work correctly. (If I load teql only, everything is fine) I loaded both netem and teql. Netem is associated with eth0, and teql is associated with both eth0 and eth1. But traffic only goes out of eth1. Attached are the commands that I used to configure teql and netem (on machine 1), and commands to

Hi, I have the following setup. Two linux systems with two [test] external interfaces encrypted with ipsec [transport]. Two gre tunnels that pass 10.200.0.0/24 and 10.200.1.0/24 network traffic. Testing the balanced tunnels I would setup iptraf on one and ping from the other. The results would be as expected; traffic would be split between the two interfaces. Testing with an ftp transfer of

A little while ago I changed my UPS to Leibert and installed NUT. Everything worked as expected. Today I tried to use the MultiLink Viewer icon from the desktop, but it simply accepted the root password without apparently doing anything. I can run the viewer directly (as root) from a file manager. The icon is owned by me, but the application is set to run as root. I suspect that the

Hi all, I want to implement a "weighted" teql that can send packets to interfaces based on their "weights". To do this, I want to create multiple virtual network interfaces, and add them to teql. Since teql will send packets to each interface in a round-robin way, a weighted teql is achieved (my guess). I already have two physical network interfaces, eth0 and eth1. I

Hi there, I have two ethernet connections of 2Mbit/s each and I''m trying to add them together to one 4Mbit/s connection but I cannot get more than approximate 1Mbit/s! My setup: I have a LAN (10.2.18.0/24), connected to a larger network (10.0.0.0/8) by two WAN-connections with 2Mbit/s each. On each end I have a Linux router. I first setup the routers to use TEQL with one of the

Hello list, I''d like to use teql with tap devices (two OpenVPN tunnels). This works, but the doc /usr/src/linux-<version>/net/sched/sch_teql.c says: "1. Slave devices MUST be active devices, i.e., they must raise the tbusy signal and generate EOI events. If you want to equalize virtual devices like tunnels, use a normal eql device." I can''t find if tap devices

Hi, I have recently updated one of my systems from CentOs 6.4 to CentOS 6.5. This systems is used as a RIPv2 routing server with quagga which is the termination point of some GRE tunnels. While running CentOS 6.4 I see the multicast packages arriving at the eth0 and the GRE tunnel interface. While running under CentOs 6.5 I can see the multicast packages arriving at the eth0 but not on the GRE

I''ve read through the nano documentation, and it says that it wont handle scenarios where the main traffic is input. Also, I''ve read through the linuxvirtualserver documentation, and i dont think that applies to me either, as that set up intercepts traffic and manipulates the final destination IP and port for the traffic. What I would like to do is 1) from the ISP standpoint,

Hi! We have 2 lines with 2 mbit each. I have to set up a configuration like the following: - if both lines work, grant 3 mbit to a web service running on a server in our DMZ - if one line fails, grant all the remaining 2 mbit to that service - if the service doesn''t need all the bandwidth, use the remaining for other services I read through the HOWTO, and figured out that I need TEQL to

Dear Gurus, Can you please help/guide me with the following: I have 3 NICs in my Linux RH 9 (kernel 2.4.20) machine. (eth0, eth1 and eth2). I want to setup a 'link equalizer' (teql) between eth0 and eth1. This I am able to do with the required commands (using the utilities 'tc' and 'ip'). Now I need to setup a bridge between eth2 and this new interface

Hi, I''m building a network similar to that seen in 4.2 of the LARTC Howto. There is a diagram of this attached to this mail. Addendum to diagram: AlexRouter br0 = 192.168.58.1 eth0 = dhcpcd DaveRouter br0 = 192.168.58.2 eth0 = dhcpcd But we''ve run into some problems when actually implementing the routing for multiple uplinks. The difference between my

Hi, I am tring to us ip route to load balance between two interfaces. ip route add equalize 10.200.1.0/24 nexthop via 10.200.0.2 dev neta nexthop via 10.200.0.2 dev neta2 Where neta and neta2 are gre tunnels. Testing show that packets travel in a single sided manner. Do I need to use the multipath (IP_ROUTE_MULTIPATH_CACHED) module? thx jason

I have been using the LEAF Bering firewall for a year or so. It boots with Syslinux 1.75. But Bering is too large for a 1440KB floppy, so it formats the diskette as 1680KB. Recently I found a small Compaq 2266 box to replace a larger Compaq 7170 to run the firewall. But when I try to boot the Bering diskette on the 2266 I get the following message: Loading Linux ............ Boot failed:

First of all, I''d like to thank Andy Furniss for his direction and for helping me get a working example up and running. For the following set up to work, you will need a linux computer at the ISP (server), a linux computer at the client location (client), and some a public range of IP''s you plan to send down to your client. (as this configuration involves patching the linux

Hi I am trying to build Xenclient and while it builds gcc, it returns following error. /home/vinxen/xenclient/build/toolchain_build_i686/gcc-4.2.4-initial/./gc c/xgcc -B/home/vinxen/xenclient/build/toolchain_build_i686/gcc-4.2.4-initial/./ gcc/ -B/home/vinxen/xenclient/build/build_i686/staging_dir/usr/i686-linux-ucl ibc/bin/

Hello, After reading the excellent HOWTO I got traffic shaping working nicely over ethernet devices on a test setup. I can''t put this setup live though, because our main firewall has three 2mbit hdlc interfaces instead of a single device. We are using multipath routing using iproute2 nexthop at the moment, and that works fine for firewalling. But now I have a need for shaping and

HI, I have a problem with nat on teql devices, i set the nat on iptables and he''s accept well , but don''t work ... he don''t masq or nat anything, i try using -j MASQUERADE too, but without results.. i m using the command: iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -j SNAT -s 10.0.0.0/24 --to ip-teql-device On kernel 2.2x with ipchains works great.