similar to: How can I Snoop L3 level IGMP packet at L2 level(Bridging level).

Hi All, I am implementing IGMPv3Snoop and want to add its control to "brctl command" just like "brctl stp ...". Please guide how can I do so. Also, it would be of great help is anyone suggests me where should I get source code of "brctl" utility from. One of the links ( http://bridge.sourceforge.net/bridge-utils/bridge-utils-0.9.5.tar.gz) I got after extensive on

Hi, Is there an IGMP Snooping implementation in development in the bridge module ? Is the bridge module a good place for this feature ? It is better to add it in the module or in user space ? Regards, Nicolas -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.linux-foundation.org/pipermail/bridge/attachments/20080411/aff8a2cf/attachment.htm

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1079 Bug ID: 1079 Summary: nft-0.6: segfault on add rule ip filter INPUT ip protocol igmp counter accept Product: nftables Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5

Greetings Please forgive the OT question yet I highly value the experience and wisdom on this list I am wondering if anyone here can address the performance difference between having a processor board with say 256KB L2 *and* 2048KB L3 cache *VERSUS* just having the same processor board with just the L2 cache in a centos server environment... Please figure that all other necessary and related

Currently we would still potentially suffer multicast packet loss if there is just either an IGMP or an MLD querier: For the former case, we would possibly drop IPv6 multicast packets, for the latter IPv4 ones. This is because we are currently assuming that if either an IGMP or MLD querier is present that the other one is present, too. This patch makes the behaviour and fix added in "bridge:

The testsuite that checks for mcast_max_groups functionality will need to wipe the added groups as well. Add helpers to build an IGMP or MLD packets announcing that host is leaving a given group. Signed-off-by: Petr Machata <petrm at nvidia.com> --- tools/testing/selftests/net/forwarding/lib.sh | 50 +++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 50 insertions(+) diff --git

How come snoop doesn''t find the vnic0, by default: root at pine:~# ifconfig -a lo0: flags=2001000849<UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING,MULTICAST,IPv4,VIRTUAL> mtu 8232 index 1 inet 127.0.0.1 netmask ff000000 vnic0: flags=1000843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST,IPv4> mtu 1500 index 2 inet 10.9.59.56 netmask ffffffe0 broadcast 10.9.59.63 ether 2:8:20:7f:a9:16 lo0:

So, just to play with vnics with 106, I have... e1000g2 plumb''d with 192.168.85.10 vnic0 is created on top of e1000g2 with 192.168.85.22 I snoop on e1000g2 to see the traffic. I ping 192.168.85.22 and it works. I stop the snoop on e1000g2. I ping 192.168.85.22 and it doesn''t work. I start the snoop on e1000g2. I ping 192.168.85.22 and ping works. Is this a new feature with

Author: okie Repository: /hg/zfs-crypto/gate Revision: 3539e54c4963ce8c33e3ff7b30d7310dec4602cc Log message: 6328950 snoop/Makefile has a snoop_igmp.c typo (should be .o) Files: update: usr/src/cmd/cmd-inet/usr.sbin/snoop/Makefile

I''m rate limiting and prioritizing traffic upstream of a slow wan link using htb, classic wonder shaper type stuff. I''m using the following command for traffic that does not match any of my defined filters: tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: htb default 50 It appears that local, non-routable traffic like arps and igmp are being snared by this and end-up queued in the lowest

The BBC are currently trialling multicasting the Olympics. This requires multicast and IGMP to be available. As far as I can make out, in 2.0.8 at least, all multicast addresses are filtered out and, to my naive eyes, can''t be re-enabled. Please prove me wrong :-) Dirk -- Please Note: Some Quantum Physics Theories Suggest That When the Consumer Is Not Directly Observing This Message,

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- ******************************************************************** The contents of this email are intended exclusively for the addressee. If you are not the addressee you must not read use or disclose the email contents ; you should notify us immediately [ by clicking "Reply" ] and delete this email. Nationwide monitors e-mails to ensure its systems

These functions will be helpful for other testsuites as well. Extract them to a common place. Signed-off-by: Petr Machata <petrm at nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch at nvidia.com> --- .../selftests/net/forwarding/bridge_mdb.sh | 49 ------------------- tools/testing/selftests/net/forwarding/lib.sh | 49 +++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 49

I tried to close everything I had open and filter as best as I could.. but left random lines in just in case it helps. 172.16.5.230 is my local machine and *.33.235 is the server. This is a slow save.. 13:48:39.852340 (60) 001F5B35DB28 Broadcast UDP - Other Ports 172.16.5.93 172.16.5.255 00:04:53.922946 293.922946 13:48:39.852605 (60) 001F5B35DB28 USC-IANA

Author: jpk Repository: /hg/zfs-crypto/gate Revision: e7e07b2f4fcfbe725493f4074f9e9f0d8bfd8e1c Log message: PSARC/2002/762 Layered Trusted Solaris PSARC/2005/060 TSNET: Trusted Networking with Security Labels PSARC/2005/259 Layered Trusted Solaris Label Interfaces PSARC/2005/573 Solaris Trusted Extensions for Printing PSARC/2005/691 Trusted Extensions for Device Allocation PSARC/2005/723 Solaris

Dear dtrace Experts, I have seen some dtrace utilities like opensnoop and execsnoop etc. My interest is to write a simple script that can snoop the files which uses the 3 syscalls like open,create,unlink. I have gone through dtrace oneliners that can do the same : dtrace -n ''syscall::open*:entry { printf("%s %s",execname,copyinstr(arg0));}'' dtrace -n

Almost all DID providers refer to XO and L3. Are they the only sources for DIDs in USA and everybody has to go to them? Could someone explain how exactly it works? Thanks -- Zeeshan A Zakaria -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20070531/170b14cb/attachment.htm

Hi , I have posted DTrace script to snoop tcp traffic and also provided a wrapper script for it to filter out unwanted traffic. http://blogs.sun.com/roller/comments/raviswam/Weblog/tcp_snoop_using_dtrace Please let me know if you have any feedback/comments on this. Thanks Ravi

Hello; Anyone used PoE L2 network switches other than cisco and recommend this for us? We need it to be stable and costly effective. Regards Bilal -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20130714/54feca5a/attachment.htm>

Hello, I have improved quality for -l3,-l4,-l5 settings.I have diminished residual coding and I have raised again quantization.These settings are now better. Update at: http://nhwcodec.blogspot.com/ The NHW Project with this version starts to be competitive at high compression with x265. Any feedback welcome! Cheers, Raphael -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was