similar to: help

Does anyone know if load balancing and DNAT work well together? I know that load balancing and NAT do not, but what about a simple port forward? I can''t apply Julian Anastasov''s patches, because they don''t work with PPTP patches. :/ Anyhow, a simple: iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -i eth0 -p tcp --dport xxx -j DNAT --to yyy:xxx iptables -I FORWARD -i eth0 -d yyy -p

The LARTC howto correctly describes load balancing and split access for traffic from a machine with multiple ISP connections (http://www.lartc.org/lartc.html#LARTC.RPDB.MULTIPLE-LINKS) -- *provided* the traffic originates from the machine itself (i.e. traffic regularly handled by the INPUT and OUTPUT chains of iptables). When forwarding traffic from an attached local network, the following

Hi, I have configured samba to authenticate against a windows 2003 AD. There is no error joining to the domain .. If I try to access any share using smbclient using an existing user account from the AD, it returns an error "NT_STATUS_LOGON_FAILURE". On adding the same user to local machine (/etc/passwd), the smbclient logs in and displays all information properly. Is this the usual

I have tried using iptraf for my NAT firewall to analyse the IP traffic. Basically I am faced with this difficulty of related the source IP to the outgoing interface to the internet, so I am wondering if anyone has a suggestion for a different ways to do it, or a suggestion for a better tool. Details :- Supposed : eth0 - LAN eth1 - WAN1 eth2 - WAN2 And then

Hello, A client of mine has this ancient software called VideoPrinter (working on Win98) and an ancient hardware that connects to the PC through both LAN cable and serial (COM) cable. I decided to give this software a try with wine 0.9.60 running on Slackware 12, kernel 2.6.23.4. The software installs without problems and after adding the appropriate registry keys the COM is recognized. But the

I am running Samba 2.2.8a on solaris 5.7 machines. I have had 2 subnet working just fine for years. I'm trying to add a 3rd subnet. I am having a problem with my XP machines on a third subnet. I have changed the registry so: requiresignorseal = 0 and requiresecurechannel = 0 and rebooted. and Enable NetBIOS over TCPIP is set. I have two XP machines one with NETBEUI install and one without

Hello all, There is still a use for netbeui (non-routed protocol) in the network. If you are using a VPN client that does not allow split tunneling, you can still access printers on another local system with netbeui. I would like to remove the windows system and have my print shares on my Linux system with Samba. Is all consideration of netbeui within the Linux/Samba environment gone?

Thanks to those who wrote and suggested I remove NetBEUI from my Win95 machines. Here's the next chapter in the story: First, based on another suggestion, I tried "netstat -a" on the Win95 machine "secretary". It didn't show any kind of traffic on ports 137-139 (even though files WERE being shared at the time). Next, I tried removing NetBEUI from

This problem is driving nuts, so I am seeking help here. Your help will be deeply appreciated. I have made myself a Linux bridge with eth1 and eth0 to form br0. Then I run a script to configure tc with htb on it. But I can never match non-icmp traffic ( such as tcp and udp ) with TOS or DSCP values such as 0x68. The full story as follows :- 1. On the source testing machine, I do this to set

HI all ! I've read in a doc, that Samba is talking only with the clients where Netbios over TCP/IP is running ! I guess it is true, but are there any solution maybe to connect with a client where only the NETBEUI is the only one installed protocol ? It would be from DOS, I have a DOS boot disk which is waking up the Netbeui, and it would be difficult to prepare it to wake up the TCP/IP !

Hi, I've been building a gtkmm project on ubuntu and things run smoothly. Now i have to move the project to CentOS 5.4. I set up rpm forge and installed gtkmm. Turns out that the package on rpmforge is too old that my project doesn't compile. I wonder if there is other way to get newer version of gtkmm and all its dependencies instead of manually install them? -best, Ming-ching

Hi, I replaced my old Windows NT box runnig as PDC with a Cobolt Qube 3 and Samba-2.2.2-C1. Cobalt Linux version is 2.2.16C33_III+VPN. With the WinNT as PDC, all windows client's in the network had only TCP/IP protocol installed and they were able to browse the network and see each other. With Samba running as PDC, TCP/IP only is not enough to browse the network. I had to install NETBIOS

Hello: Is it possible to run SAMBA over IPX/NetBeui? (I will thank any suggestion) I hava an small LAN of 3 computers, connected to the Internet through a Cable-modem with DHCP (the cablemodem and the computers are all connected to a hub). The CableModem assigns every computer a random public IP adress, but usually from diferent range (ie: 212.78.x.x, 62.57.x.x, etc), so I cannot get SAMBA or

Subject almost says it all, I wonder if there is a way for me to use iptables matches like l7 and/or ipp2p match in a bridge ( one ethernet in and one ethernet out ) ? Regards.

Normally when we talk about traffic control, we are talking about doing traffic control (tc) using a router, ie packets into an interface and based on routing, they goes out to somewhere else. However I have a box with two interfaces, eth0 and eth1 added to a bridge br0 and I would like to perform traffic control via the two interfaces. Is that supposed to work the same as the router

Samba is working perfect on our main subnet, but it won't for any additional subnets on this domain. We use NT authentication and my system is an RS/6000. I just found out that our routers for these additional subnets have netbeui/netbios turned off. Network Admin. said it's because they're set not to allow broadcasting (and they're not going to start), and turning

Can SAMBA be used on Solaris9/SUN OS 5.8 to emulate a MicroSoft NetBeui client and thereby print to a print server. I have a printer(ps) that is netbeui only and want to print to it from a Sparc station. lp and lpr are not available by TCP/IP. Please respond off the board(direct-mail) as I'm sure this is too basic for most users and I did not subscribe to list. I did search the archives and

I think this has been addressed a few times, but without quite satisfactory results. I have a private subnet behind an NAT proxy server (IPMASQ), and a public subnet on the other side with the NT PDC on the public. (Using both NetBEUI & TCP/IP). The PDC will change later, but currently I'm trying to find out how this all works before I do that. I'm trying to make a client machine on

Hello, Recently, I am coding a program about read and write control. And there are some questions confusing me. 1. In info libext2fs: Function: errcode_t ext2fs_get_blocks (ext2_filsys FS, ext2_ino_t INO, blk_t *BLOCKS) Returns an array of blocks corresponding to the direct, indirect, doubly indirect, and triply indirect blocks as stored in the inode structure. So I wrote some codes like

On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 10:50 AM, Renato Golin <rengolin at systemcall.org> wrote: > On 10 March 2010 16:57, 琬菁楊 <ching1119.cs96 at g2.nctu.edu.tw> wrote: >> I think the main issue is that EFI C dialect is not ANSI-C compliant: the >> size of pointer is determined at the run-time and therefore the layout of >> the structure is not static. Does LLVM support this